Case Explained: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. SARAH LYNN BERRY episode artwork

EPISODE · Jul 28, 2026 · 0 MIN

Case Explained: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. SARAH LYNN BERRY

from DIFTCL: Federal Narrative Summaries · host amf-wp

Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit Filed: 2026-07-28 The fourth-circuit affirmed the district court’s orders denying Sarah Lynn Berry’s Federal Rule of Criminal Procedure 36 motion to correct a clerical error in her criminal judgment and denying her subsequent motion for reconsideration. The court reviewed the record and found no reversible error. The practical consequence is that the district court’s denial of the motions stands, and oral argument was dispensed with because the facts and legal contentions were adequately presented in the written materials. Do It For The Case Law is a news reporting service. Nothing in this episode constitutes legal advice.

Episode metadata supplied by the publisher feed · Published Jul 28, 2026

Embed this episode

NOW PLAYING

Case Explained: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. SARAH LYNN BERRY

0:00 0:46

No transcript for this episode yet

We transcribe on demand. Request one and we'll notify you when it's ready — usually under 10 minutes.

No similar episodes found.

No similar podcasts found.

Frequently Asked Questions

How long is this episode of DIFTCL: Federal Narrative Summaries?

This episode is 0 minutes long.

When was this DIFTCL: Federal Narrative Summaries episode published?

This episode was published on July 28, 2026.

Can I download this DIFTCL: Federal Narrative Summaries episode?

Yes. Use the download control on the episode player to save the publisher-provided media file.
URL copied to clipboard!