Case Explained: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. STEPHEN PILSON episode artwork

EPISODE · Jun 17, 2026 · 0 MIN

Case Explained: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. STEPHEN PILSON

from DIFTCL: Federal Narrative Summaries · host Do It For The Caselaw

Court: United States Court of Appeals for the First Circuit Filed: 2026-06-17 The first-circuit issued an errata sheet amending its opinion in *United States v. Pilson* to correct two clerical errors: changing the word “elocution” to “allocution” on page 10, line 7, and changing “free-reign” to “free-rein” on page 23, line 21. The court’s stated basis for this action is to ensure the accuracy of the official record by fixing typographical mistakes in the text of the opinion issued on June 1, 2026. No substantive legal holding or change to the disposition was made; the practical consequence is that the corrected opinion now stands as the authoritative version of the court’s decision. Do It For The Case Law is a news reporting service. Nothing in this episode constitutes legal advice.

Episode metadata supplied by the publisher feed · Published Jun 17, 2026

Embed this episode

NOW PLAYING

Case Explained: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. STEPHEN PILSON

0:00 0:37

No transcript for this episode yet

We transcribe on demand. Request one and we'll notify you when it's ready — usually under 10 minutes.

No similar episodes found.

No similar podcasts found.

Frequently Asked Questions

How long is this episode of DIFTCL: Federal Narrative Summaries?

This episode is 0 minutes long.

When was this DIFTCL: Federal Narrative Summaries episode published?

This episode was published on June 17, 2026.

Can I download this DIFTCL: Federal Narrative Summaries episode?

Yes. Use the download control on the episode player to save the publisher-provided media file.
URL copied to clipboard!