EPISODE · Jun 24, 2026 · 0 MIN
Case Explained: USA V. ESQUIVEL-BOLANOS
from DIFTCL: Federal Narrative Summaries · host amf-wp
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit Filed: 2026-06-24 Docket: 2:23-cr-00047-TOR-2 The Ninth Circuit affirmed the judgment of conviction and sentence for conspiracy to distribute controlled substances, distribution of methamphetamine, possession with intent to distribute, and possession of a firearm in furtherance of a drug trafficking crime following an independent review of the record under *Penson v. Ohio*. The court found no non-frivolous arguments for appeal after counsel filed a brief under *Anders v. California* stating that no such arguments existed, and the appellant failed to file a pro se supplemental brief. Consequently, the court denied the defendant’s pro se requests to appoint new counsel and granted counsel’s motion to withdraw. Do It For The Case Law is a news reporting service. Nothing in this episode constitutes legal advice.
NOW PLAYING
Case Explained: USA V. ESQUIVEL-BOLANOS
No transcript for this episode yet
Similar Episodes
May 9, 2026 ·49m
May 2, 2026 ·49m
Apr 25, 2026 ·49m
Apr 21, 2026 ·13m
Apr 19, 2026 ·16m
Apr 18, 2026 ·49m