Case Explained: USA V. FLORES episode artwork

EPISODE · Aug 3, 2026 · 0 MIN

Case Explained: USA V. FLORES

from DIFTCL: Federal Narrative Summaries · host amf-wp

Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit Filed: 2026-08-03 Docket: 8:23-cr-00063-DOC-1 The ninth-circuit affirmed the district court’s judgment and sentence as to issues covered by the defendant’s appeal waiver, following an independent review of the record that disclosed no basis for challenge. The court dismissed the remainder of the appeal regarding the enforceability of the appeal waiver because counsel filed a brief under *Anders v. California* identifying no non-frivolous arguments, and the defendant did not file a pro se supplemental brief. Consequently, the court granted counsel’s motion to withdraw. Do It For The Case Law is a news reporting service. Nothing in this episode constitutes legal advice.

Episode metadata supplied by the publisher feed · Published Aug 3, 2026

Embed this episode

NOW PLAYING

Case Explained: USA V. FLORES

0:00 0:53

No transcript for this episode yet

We transcribe on demand. Request one and we'll notify you when it's ready — usually under 10 minutes.

No similar episodes found.

No similar podcasts found.

Frequently Asked Questions

How long is this episode of DIFTCL: Federal Narrative Summaries?

This episode is 0 minutes long.

When was this DIFTCL: Federal Narrative Summaries episode published?

This episode was published on August 3, 2026.

Can I download this DIFTCL: Federal Narrative Summaries episode?

Yes. Use the download control on the episode player to save the publisher-provided media file.
URL copied to clipboard!