EPISODE · Aug 3, 2026 · 0 MIN
Case Explained: USA V. FLORES
from DIFTCL: Federal Narrative Summaries · host amf-wp
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit Filed: 2026-08-03 Docket: 8:23-cr-00063-DOC-1 The ninth-circuit affirmed the district court’s judgment and sentence as to issues covered by the defendant’s appeal waiver, following an independent review of the record that disclosed no basis for challenge. The court dismissed the remainder of the appeal regarding the enforceability of the appeal waiver because counsel filed a brief under *Anders v. California* identifying no non-frivolous arguments, and the defendant did not file a pro se supplemental brief. Consequently, the court granted counsel’s motion to withdraw. Do It For The Case Law is a news reporting service. Nothing in this episode constitutes legal advice.
Embed this episode
NOW PLAYING
Case Explained: USA V. FLORES
No transcript for this episode yet
Similar Episodes
No similar episodes found.
Similar Podcasts
No similar podcasts found.