Consumer Responses to LGBTQ-Themed Advertising: What 20,000 YouTube Comments Reveal episode artwork

EPISODE · Jul 16, 2026 · 16 MIN

Consumer Responses to LGBTQ-Themed Advertising: What 20,000 YouTube Comments Reveal

from JAR Inside the Research Podcast · host Journal of Advertising Research

In this episode, guest interviewer Dr. Steven Park (Queen Mary University of London) speaks with Jia Heng Li and Professor Tae Hyun Baek (both Sungkyunkwan University) to discuss their article, "Consumer Responses to LGBTQ-Themed Advertising: A Computational Analysis of YouTube Comments," coauthored with Minseong Kim (Louisiana State University Shreveport), just published in the June 2026 issue of JAR.Jia Heng explains how the study moves beyond the surveys and experiments that dominate research on LGBTQ-themed advertising by analyzing what consumers naturally say online. Using computational text mining of more than 20,000 YouTube comments on LGBTQ-themed ads, the authors identify six key topics of conversation, from LGBTQ celebrations and family values to drag culture, brand activism, and gender roles. The headline finding is that overall sentiment is more positive than many might expect, with themes of pride, inclusion, and family associated with emotions like joy and trust. But responses are far from uniform: drag culture and brand activism generate polarized reactions, driven by discomfort with nontraditional gender expressions and skepticism about corporate authenticity. Crucially, consumers aren't just reacting to the ad itself. They're evaluating the brand behind it, questioning whether its support reflects genuine values or "rainbow-washing."The practical takeaways for advertisers are threefold: treat inclusion as a long-term commitment rather than a one-off campaign, recognize that different forms of LGBTQ representation call for different communication strategies, and mine the comment section, which often reveals more than views and engagement metrics ever could. The discussion also digs into the challenge of interpreting sarcasm and irony in online comments, why the authors paired computational analysis with extensive manual validation, and where this research should go next, from cross-platform comparisons to cross-cultural work.Read the full paper here: https://doi.org/10.1080/00218499.2025.2554437To keep up to date on the latest JAR news sign up for our newsletter: https://lp.constantcontactpages.com/su/mtD04QNAnd follow us on LinkedIn: https://www.linkedin.com/company/82528291/admin/

Episode metadata supplied by the publisher feed · Published Jul 16, 2026

Embed this episode

In this episode, guest interviewer Dr. Steven Park (Queen Mary University of London) speaks with Jia Heng Li and Professor Tae Hyun Baek (both Sungkyunkwan University) to discuss their article, "Consumer Responses to LGBTQ-Themed Advertising: A Computational Analysis of YouTube Comments," coauthored with Minseong Kim (Louisiana State University Shreveport), just published in the June 2026 issue of JAR. Jia Heng explains how the study moves beyond the surveys and experiments that dominate res...

Distinct summary based on available episode metadata or transcript content.

NOW PLAYING

Consumer Responses to LGBTQ-Themed Advertising: What 20,000 YouTube Comments Reveal

0:00 16:22

No transcript for this episode yet

We transcribe on demand. Request one and we'll notify you when it's ready — usually under 10 minutes.

No similar episodes found.

No similar podcasts found.

Frequently Asked Questions

How long is this episode of JAR Inside the Research Podcast?

This episode is 16 minutes long.

When was this JAR Inside the Research Podcast episode published?

This episode was published on July 16, 2026.

Can I download this JAR Inside the Research Podcast episode?

Yes. Use the download control on the episode player to save the publisher-provided media file.
URL copied to clipboard!