EPISODE · Jan 18, 2024 · 52 MIN
Courthouse Steps Oral Argument: Sheetz v. County of El Dorado, CA
from FedSoc Forums · host The Federalist Society
On January 9, 2024, the U.S. Supreme Court will hear oral argument in Sheetz v. County of El Dorado, CA. This case is a property-rights challenge by a California landowner to nearly $24,000 in development fees levied by the county as a condition for receiving a permit to build a manufactured home. The court will determine whether a monetary exaction imposed by a local government as a condition for a building permit is exempt from the “essential nexus” and “rough proportionality” requirements established in Nollan v. Cal. Coastal Comm’n and Dolan v. City of Tigard, simply because the exaction is authorized by local legislation. Please join us as we break down and analyze how oral argument went before the Court. Featuring: David P. Lanferman, Partner, Rutan & Tucker LLP Nancie G. Marzulla, Partner, Marzullla Law
What this episode covers
On January 9, 2024, the U.S. Supreme Court will hear oral argument in Sheetz v. County of El Dorado, CA. This case is a property-rights challenge by a California landowner to nearly $24,000 in development fees levied by the county as a condition for receiving a permit to build a manufactured home. The court will determine whether a monetary exaction imposed by a local government as a condition for a building permit is exempt from the “essential nexus” and “rough proportionality” requirements established in Nollan v. Cal. Coastal Comm’n and Dolan v. City of Tigard, simply because the exaction is authorized by local legislation. Please join us as we break down and analyze how oral argument went before the Court. Featuring: David P. Lanferman, Partner, Rutan & Tucker LLP Nancie G. Marzulla, Partner, Marzullla Law
NOW PLAYING
Courthouse Steps Oral Argument: Sheetz v. County of El Dorado, CA
No transcript for this episode yet
Similar Episodes
Jun 23, 2026 ·54m
Jun 23, 2026 ·47m
Jun 22, 2026 ·54m
Jun 21, 2026 ·71m
Jun 18, 2026 ·58m