COVID-19 Mandates and Constitutional Limits—The Stewart v. Walz Case episode artwork

EPISODE · Apr 29, 2025 · 13 MIN

COVID-19 Mandates and Constitutional Limits—The Stewart v. Walz Case

from Unwritten Law

In this episode of Unwritten Law, NCLA President Mark Chenoweth and Senior Litigation Counsel John Vecchione are joined by NCLA attorney Jenin Younes to discuss her latest case challenging Minnesota’s COVID-era vaccine mandate. The case, Stewart v. Walz, centers on a public college professor who was fired for refusing the vaccine and later punished for emailing his students about it. Jenin explains how the case challenges the misuse of emergency power, the misreading of the 1905 Jacobson precedent, and the violation of First Amendment rights. With courts beginning to reevaluate the legality of pandemic-era mandates, NCLA is giving the judiciary a new opportunity to get it right.

Episode metadata supplied by the publisher feed · Published Apr 29, 2025

Embed this episode

NOW PLAYING

COVID-19 Mandates and Constitutional Limits—The Stewart v. Walz Case

0:00 13:54

No transcript for this episode yet

We transcribe on demand. Request one and we'll notify you when it's ready — usually under 10 minutes.

No similar episodes found.

Frequently Asked Questions

How long is this episode of Unwritten Law?

This episode is 13 minutes long.

When was this Unwritten Law episode published?

This episode was published on April 29, 2025.

Can I download this Unwritten Law episode?

Yes. Use the download control on the episode player to save the publisher-provided media file.
URL copied to clipboard!