Defense Appears To Have Missed Court Ordered Deadline RE: Idaho v Kohberger Documents

Here we provide pure opinions, comments, and speculation concerning events occurring in the Idaho4 Defamation case, a 2 count federal lawsuit alleging defamation of character by a University of Idaho (Moscow) History Professor against an on-line personality/content creator and psychic in the case styled as Rebecca Scofield v. Ashley Guillard. Per the federal docket, it appears Defense missed an important court-ordered deadline to respond to documents filed by Plaintiff from the Idaho v. Kohberger criminal case. The court-ordered response was to a Plaintiff filing on February 18, 2026 has resulted in the court setting a schedule for a response and a reply thereto on "the courthouse steps" just before the federal jury trial set to commence on Tuesday, February 24, 2026. LINK to our prior podcast on Federal Diversity of Citizenship Jurisdiction in the Idaho4 Defamation Case:https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3NcoGyUvx-c&t=107sEverything here represents the pure opinion, commentary, speculation and rhetorical questions per the First Amendment to the United States Constitution which states at Amendment I:Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the government for a redress of grievances.It is codified within Section 107 of the U.S. Copyright Act, which provides that fair use of a work “for purposes such as criticism, comment, news reporting, teaching (including multiple copies for classroom use, scholarship, or research)” is not an infringement of copyright. #RebeccaScofield#AshleyGuillard#Idaho4#Defamation#BryanKohberger