Demise of the Nuclear Family According to the Liberated Female and Male Genders

Definition of nuclear family: Known as the traditional family unit, which includes a mother figure who acts, first and foremost, as caretaker of the family, a father figure whose primary role involves provisioning and protecting the children and wife. Avoiding the decision to abort a fetus by being happily married till death do us part. Also, the term is associated with the  cause of abortion and divorce. We've learned over the past 25 years that children living in single parent homes, the odds of living in poverty are great.  The current rate of children born out of wed lock is staggering.  The increase in divorces (2.4 million per year) add to this problem of lost, insecure, misguided and abused children that no one but God can decide it be sin or a circumstance. Abortions in America on average 900,000 per year due to rapes, sexual abuse and incest that occur 463,000 times and rapes alone are 126,000, 250,000 kids are homeless. There are 30,000 gangs, a million members  and 2.5 million immigrants in fatherless homes. All looking for a replacement for the nuclear home.  Be it a commune, a gang, Jones Island, a hoodie or being on the streets as a homeless, legalized orphan.  Compounded by society requiring a living wage and a safe place to live to just survive.  Facts sow that every 5 seconds, children under 15 are victims of poverty, starvation, abuse, trafficking until they die. 15 million in total face a life of danger and lack of security of a two parent nuclear family. Since 1970s in America out of wedlock birth rates soared.  In 1965 24% of black infants and 3.1% of white infante were born to single mothers.  By 1990 the rates had risen to 64% for black infants and 18% for white infants Every year about one million more children are born in fatherless families.  Each couple  facehd with the instant decision to conceive or not conceive.  That decision, it seems, is never in contemplation of having a family, loving and raising a dependent child.  It's either facing an abortion, taking a life or a marriage taking a wife.  I repeat; here the mother is to take the pill, the father use protection and the child is being victimized by society's rejection of a legalized orphan. The supreme court was asked to judge for society, what's best for the zygote (a single cell) or the union gametes (a fetus) conceived by the coconspirator father and a judgmental mother to make the right decision or live forever with the consequences of their decision to abort a life or take a wife.  The jury, the child being left to wonder what decision should have been made ... abort or resort to being another out of wedlock delinquent orphan. Tainted by society's judgmental peers of his or her own self worth.  Those human consequences must be made by the conceivers for their own values and conscience. The "right to lifers" say a new life begins at conception.  The "free to choosers" say it is after 15 weeks that life begins.  It's a surprise, if not planned parenthood, its take a life or take a wife.  The question is also, can that life be freed to live a fruitful life or suffer from the lack of Monogamy meaning out of wedlock.  Where the mother is the judge, the father the coconspirator and the child the jury being victimized by society's rejection as a legalized orphan. Where the parents have many rational and rationalized reasons for taking a life not a wife. Why then is the nuclear family being destroyed by divorce, when America is founded on that being the security it takes to live a fruitful life.  During the 60"s women were truly liberated and gender became less important, leaving offspring in the middle. Ironically, divorce is never for the children's benefit.  Even the politics says we are free to choose our fate or faith.  The problem is us not the Supreme Court.