Duration vs Distance for Running Training
from Fix My Running Hosted by Matthew Boyd
If you’re an injured runner we can help you get back to running pain-free. Click the link to book a free call with us https://matthewboydphysio.com/booking/ Running Fundamentals Course https://matthewboydphysio.com/running-fundamentals-course/ Instagram https://www.instagram.com/matthewboydphysio/ Summary In this episode, Matthew Boyd discusses the merits of using duration over distance in running training, particularly for injury recovery. He explains how duration allows for better quantification of mechanical stress on the body, which is crucial for rehabilitation. Boyd emphasizes the importance of tailoring training programs to individual needs and balancing recovery with performance optimization. He also highlights the significance of understanding mechanical stress and its impact on recovery, advocating for a systematic approach to running training that prioritizes resilience and injury prevention. Takeaways Using duration can be more beneficial for injury recovery. Mechanical stress must be carefully monitored during training. Tailoring training to individual runners is essential. Duration allows for easier quantification of stress. Injury is a primary constraint for many runners. Running is a form of rehabilitation for injuries. Progression of training should be based on individual response. Distance is more appropriate for performance-focused training. Understanding the adaptive zone is crucial for recovery. Consistent training leads to improved performance and fewer injuries.
Embed this episode
No transcript yet.