EPISODE · Feb 6, 2025 · 4 MIN
Episode 410: Could Det. Mowery, Mr. Ray be excluded from trial "in limine?
from Kathy's InDieZoNe · host Kathy DiTondo
In Episode 410, we note that the deadlines for the parties to simultaneously file their respective motions in liming is quickly approaching. A pure opinion based on speculation considers whether Defense could move for Det. Mowery to be stricken as State's proposed expert witness with the State of Idaho moving to have Defense's expert witness Mr. Ray stricken "in limine" to prevent the future jury from hearing from them at the "Idaho4" trial currently set to commence Summer 2025. The citation for the Idaho Supreme Court case discussed here addressing motions in limine is State of Idaho v. Ruben Daniel Diaz, Docket No. 47667 (Idaho April 6, 2022) Everything stated here represents the creator's pure opinions based on the court filings and proffered pursuant to the First Amendment of the United States Constitution (Freedom of Speech and of the Press) and is offered for educational purposes only. Mr. Kohberger is presumed innocent of these crimes until or unless he pleads guilty or is adjudicated guilty in a court of law. To review the documents from the Court's file in Idaho v. Kohbreger, please go here: https://coi.isc.idaho.gov To review documents from the matter styled as Commonwealth of PA v. Kohberger, go here: https://www.pacourts.us/news-and-stat...
Embed this episode
NOW PLAYING
Episode 410: Could Det. Mowery, Mr. Ray be excluded from trial "in limine?
No transcript for this episode yet
Similar Episodes
No similar episodes found.
Similar Podcasts
No similar podcasts found.