Episode 494: Motion in Limine # 4 (Prohibiting "name calling")

In Episode 494, we discuss the Defense's second motion in limine (following in limine motion #3) addressing the use of language the Defense asserts is prejudicial and violative of Mr. Kohberger's constitutional privileges. Here, Defense refers to the use of two terms as "name calling" and an improper "diagnosis" and which is supported by the Affidavit of a Dr. John Edens. To view this motion and other documents from the Idaho v. Kohberger case file, go here: ⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠https://coi.isc.idaho.gov/⁠⁠⁠Everything stated herein is not legal advice, but represents only the creator's pure opinions based on the court filings and proffered pursuant to the First Amendment of the United States Constitution (Freedom of Speech and of the Press) and is offered for educational purposes only. Mr. Kohberger is presumed innocent of the five first degree felonies he has been charged with until or unless he (1) pleads guilty or (2) is adjudicated guilty in a court of law.⁠⁠⁠#Idaho4⁠⁠⁠ ⁠⁠⁠#IdahovKohberger⁠⁠⁠ ⁠⁠⁠#TrueCrime⁠⁠⁠ ⁠⁠⁠#BryanKohberger⁠⁠⁠ ⁠⁠⁠#FirstAmendment⁠