First Amendment Looms Large in Candace Owens' Motion to Dismiss Defamation Lawsuit

Here we provide pure opinions, comments, and speculation concerning the current status of the 2024 civil defamation case styled as Macron v. Owens, where the President and First Lady of France have sued podcaster Candace Owens alleging the defendant defamed Ms. Macron by claiming she was born a man. In follow-up to our presentation on the Amended Complaint, we discuss the fact that Ms. Owens Motion to Dismiss the lawsuit or strike parts of the Amended Complaint we note the First Amendment as the very first reason for granting Ms. Owens the relief she seeks. Link to YT Content referenced herein: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LLD0qvE_QNE&t=169s Everything here represents the pure opinion, commentary, speculation and rhetorical questions per the First Amendment to the United States Constitution which states:Amendment ICongress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the government for a redress of grievances.It is codified within Section 107 of the U.S. Copyright Act, which provides that fair use of a work “for purposes such as criticism, comment, news reporting, teaching (including multiple copies for classroom use, scholarship, or research)” is not an infringement of copyright. ⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠#CandaceOwens#Emmanuel Macron#BrigitteMacron