EPISODE · May 24, 2026 · 12 MIN
HAVANA DOCKS CORP. v. ROYAL CARIBBEAN CRUISES
from Supreme Court Decision Syllabus (SCOTUS Podcast) · host Attorney RJ Dieken, Loki Esq Law, Montana
Send us Fan Mail Held: The cruise lines’ use of the docks is sufficient to establish that they used “property which was confiscated by the Cuban Government”; Ha vana Docks is not required to establish that the cruise lines trafficked in Havana Dock’s property interest. Pp. 8–16. (a) Title III generally makes any person who “traffics in property which was confiscated by the Cuban Government . . . liable to any United States national who owns the claim to such property.” §6082(a)(1)(A). This dispute turns on whether the relevant “property which was confiscated” must be Havana Docks’ property interest in the docks (the concession), or whether it could instead be the docks them selves. Support the show
What this episode covers
Send us Fan Mail Held: The cruise lines’ use of the docks is sufficient to establish that they used “property which was confiscated by the Cuban Government”; Ha vana Docks is not required to establish that the cruise lines trafficked in Havana Dock’s property interest. Pp. 8–16. (a) Title III generally makes any person who “traffics in property which was confiscated by the Cuban Government . . . liable to any United States national who owns the claim to such property.” §6082(a)(1)(A). T...
NOW PLAYING
HAVANA DOCKS CORP. v. ROYAL CARIBBEAN CRUISES
No transcript for this episode yet
Similar Episodes
No similar episodes found.
Similar Podcasts
No similar podcasts found.