How Might 3rd Party Person/Entity RE WSU'S 1st Affirmative Defense Be Brought Into the Case?

Here we provide pure opinions, comments, and speculation concerning the current status of the matter styled as Goncalves et al v. Washington State University addressing the rhetorical question of third party practice given the language of defense's First Affirmative Defense referencing possibly third party persons or entities who might be liable to Plaintiffs. .⁠Everything here represents the pure opinion, commentary, speculation and rhetorical questions per the First Amendment to the United States Constitution which states:Amendment I: Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the government for a redress of grievances.It is codified within Section 107 of the U.S. Copyright Act, which provides that fair use of a work “for purposes such as criticism, comment, news reporting, teaching (including multiple copies for classroom use, scholarship, or research)” is not an infringement of copyright. All parties who are charged with crimes are considered innocent under the eyes of the law until or unless they (1) are adjudicated guilty in a court of law or (2) agree to plead guilty. #Idaho4#WashingtonStateUniversity#FederalCourt#FederalRulesofCivilProcedure