How Should Democratic South Africa judge Tricameral Party collaborators? episode artwork

EPISODE · Dec 8, 2015 · 26 MIN

How Should Democratic South Africa judge Tricameral Party collaborators?

from Afternoon Talk · host SAfm

Tricameral ParliamentThe government introduced a new constitution, master-minded by P.W. Botha, in 1984. Coloureds and Indians (but not Africans) were to participate with the whites in the central governmental process. Separate, racially segregated houses were created: a House of Representatives for Coloureds and a House of Delegates for Indians. The fact that Africans were excluded caused a howl of disapproval and exacerbated the township unrest. Furthermore the new proposals were not widely accepted by either Coloureds or Indians, many of whom boycotted the elections and rejected the subordinate status afforded to them in the new system. Its obvious failure was one of the reasons why F.W. de Klerk decided to initiate negotiations with the ANC* and other anti-apartheid groups. The tricameral parliament was disbanded in 1993 once it had approved the introduction of the new interim constitution. After the 1994 election it was superseded by the Government of National Unity.

Episode metadata supplied by the publisher feed · Published Dec 8, 2015

Embed this episode

NOW PLAYING

How Should Democratic South Africa judge Tricameral Party collaborators?

0:00 26:08

No transcript for this episode yet

We transcribe on demand. Request one and we'll notify you when it's ready — usually under 10 minutes.

No similar episodes found.

No similar podcasts found.

Frequently Asked Questions

How long is this episode of Afternoon Talk?

This episode is 26 minutes long.

When was this Afternoon Talk episode published?

This episode was published on December 8, 2015.

Can I download this Afternoon Talk episode?

Yes. Use the download control on the episode player to save the publisher-provided media file.
URL copied to clipboard!