Hunter not Garza RE: Any Kohberger Appeal

Here we provide pure opinions, comments, and speculation per the First Amendment quoting and citing to it while discussing the lack of transparency in the long-closed criminal case of Idaho v. Kohberger and ask the rhetorical question of if Mr. Kohberger decides to appeal his convictions, the legal standard will be set forth in Hunter v. US not Garza v Idaho, the latter of which was addressed by Judge Steven J. Hippler in open court last year. Hunter v. US is a case concerning appellate waivers which is before the US Supreme Court at the present time. LINK to SCOTUS Oral Argument Page: https://www.supremecourt.gov/oral_arg...LINK to Hunter vs. United States SCOTUS case file: https://www.supremecourt.gov/docket/d...Everything here represents the pure opinion, commentary, speculation and rhetorical questions per the First Amendment to the United States Constitution which states:Amendment ICongress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the government for a redress of grievances.It is codified within Section 107 of the U.S. Copyright Act, which provides that fair use of a work “for purposes such as criticism, comment, news reporting, teaching (including multiple copies for classroom use, scholarship, or research)” is not an infringement of copyright. ⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠