Idaho4 Defamation Case: Plaintiff Opposes Trial "Delay" - Scofield v Guillard

Here we provide pure opinions, comments, and speculation concerning events occurring in the Idaho4 Defamation case, a 2 count federal lawsuit alleging defamation of character by a University of Idaho (Moscow) History Professor against an on-line personality/content creator and psychic in the case styled as Rebecca Scofield v. Ashley Guillard. Here we provide pure opinions, comments and speculation concerning the Plaintiff's response opposing the Defense's Motion to Continue the February 24, 2026 jury trial which was set in the summer of 2025 referring to said motion as a "delay" tactic and urging the court to allow the trial to proceed as set. Everything here represents the pure opinion, commentary, speculation and rhetorical questions per the First Amendment to the United States Constitution which states at Amendment I:Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the government for a redress of grievances.It is codified within Section 107 of the U.S. Copyright Act, which provides that fair use of a work “for purposes such as criticism, comment, news reporting, teaching (including multiple copies for classroom use, scholarship, or research)” is not an infringement of copyright. #RebeccaScofield#AshleyGuillard#Idaho4#Defamation#BryanKohberger