Jury Trials vs. Administrative Power—Did the Third Circuit Misread Jarkesy? episode artwork

EPISODE · Jul 24, 2025 · 22 MIN

Jury Trials vs. Administrative Power—Did the Third Circuit Misread Jarkesy?

from Unwritten Law

In this episode of Unwritten Law, NCLA’s Mark Chenoweth and John Vecchione break down the recent Third Circuit decision in Axalta Coating Systems v. Federal Aviation Administration.The case tests how lower courts apply the Supreme Court’s landmark Jarkesy ruling, which emphasized the importance of jury trials and Article III courts for administrative adjudications. Mark and John explore why the panel sided with agency adjudication despite the Supreme Court’s warnings, discuss Judge Bibas’s powerful concurrence highlighting ongoing constitutional concerns, and analyze the troubling reliance on the expansive "public rights" doctrine. Will this decision prompt the Supreme Court to finally clarify—and potentially curb—the administrative state's adjudicative power?Key topics: Jarkesy v. SEC, administrative adjudication, jury trial rights, Article III courts, public rights doctrine, nondelegation doctrine, Axalta v. FAA, and separation of powers.

Episode metadata supplied by the publisher feed · Published Jul 24, 2025

Embed this episode

NOW PLAYING

Jury Trials vs. Administrative Power—Did the Third Circuit Misread Jarkesy?

0:00 22:33

No transcript for this episode yet

We transcribe on demand. Request one and we'll notify you when it's ready — usually under 10 minutes.

No similar episodes found.

Frequently Asked Questions

How long is this episode of Unwritten Law?

This episode is 22 minutes long.

When was this Unwritten Law episode published?

This episode was published on July 24, 2025.

Can I download this Unwritten Law episode?

Yes. Use the download control on the episode player to save the publisher-provided media file.
URL copied to clipboard!