Kohberger vs. Idaho: Will a Possible Post-Hunter Appeal be the Route to Transparency? (Opinion) episode artwork

EPISODE · Mar 5, 2026 · 10 MIN

Kohberger vs. Idaho: Will a Possible Post-Hunter Appeal be the Route to Transparency? (Opinion)

from Kathy's InDieZoNe · host Kathy DiTondo

Here we provide pure opinions, comments, and speculation per the First Amendment quoting and citing to it while discussing the lack of transparency in the long-closed criminal case of Idaho v. Kohberger and ask the rhetorical question of whether a possible future appeal might be the route to learning exactly what happened behind the scenes in the h ighly-sealed case? Also addressed in the Supreme Court's pending ruling in Hunter vs. United States dealing with appellate waivers.The rhetorical question is also discussed raising pure opinions, comments and speculation as to whether this might change the legal climate should Mr. Kohberger the defendant in Idaho v. Kohberger seek at some point in future to challenge his appeal waiver set forth within his plea agreement. Note: There is no indication Mr. Kohberger has sought/will seek to challenge his plea deal as of the time of the recording of this presentation. LINK to SCOTUS Oral Argument Page: https://www.supremecourt.gov/oral_arguments/oral_arguments.aspxLINK to Hunter vs. United States SCOTUS case file: https://www.supremecourt.gov/docket/docketfiles/html/public/24-1063.htmlLink to our YT community page: https://www.youtube.com/@KathysIndieZoNe/postsEverything here represents the pure opinion, commentary, speculation and rhetorical questions per the First Amendment to the United States Constitution which states:Amendment ICongress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the government for a redress of grievances.It is codified within Section 107 of the U.S. Copyright Act, which provides that fair use of a work “for purposes such as criticism, comment, news reporting, teaching (including multiple copies for classroom use, scholarship, or research)” is not an infringement of copyright. ⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠

Episode metadata supplied by the publisher feed · Published Mar 5, 2026

Embed this episode

NOW PLAYING

Kohberger vs. Idaho: Will a Possible Post-Hunter Appeal be the Route to Transparency? (Opinion)

0:00 10:12

No transcript for this episode yet

We transcribe on demand. Request one and we'll notify you when it's ready — usually under 10 minutes.

No similar episodes found.

No similar podcasts found.

Frequently Asked Questions

How long is this episode of Kathy's InDieZoNe?

This episode is 10 minutes long.

When was this Kathy's InDieZoNe episode published?

This episode was published on March 5, 2026.

Can I download this Kathy's InDieZoNe episode?

Yes. Use the download control on the episode player to save the publisher-provided media file.
URL copied to clipboard!