Kouri Richins: After the Conviction — What a Potential Appeal Would Actually Argue

Kouri Richins has been convicted of aggravated murder. The legal fight doesn't end with a verdict. Tony Brueski, defense attorney Bob Motta, and retired FBI Behavioral Analysis Chief Robin Dreeke examine the appellate record built during this trial and what arguments have real traction.The video of investigators directing Carmen Lauber toward conviction — admitted at trial, seen by the jury, and now potentially central to a due process argument. The hearsay ruling that blocked testimony about Eric allegedly asking someone about obtaining fentanyl — and the complication that the defense walked away from it themselves. The denied spoliation instruction over the missing pill bottle. The Lauber informant instruction language. Bob Motta breaks down which arguments a higher court would take seriously and which ones sound stronger than they are. All individuals are presumed innocent until proven guilty in a court of law.Join Our SubStack For AD-FREE ADVANCE EPISODES & EXTRAS!: https://hiddenkillers.substack.com/Want to comment and watch this podcast as a video? Check out our YouTube Channel. https://www.youtube.com/channel/UC8-vxmbhTxxG10sO1izODJg?sub_confirmation=1Instagram https://www.instagram.com/hiddenkillerspod/Facebook https://www.facebook.com/hiddenkillerspod/Tik-Tok https://www.tiktok.com/@hiddenkillerspodX Twitter https://x.com/TrueCrimePodThis publication contains commentary and opinion based on publicly available information. All individuals are presumed innocent until proven guilty in a court of law. Nothing published here should be taken as a statement of fact, health or legal advice.#KouriRichins #KouriRichinsGuilty #EricRichins #TrueCrime #CriminalAppeal #MurderTrial #TrueCrimePodcast #HiddenKillers #DueProcess #UtahMurder