Lamps plus v Varela (forced class arbitration)

from Supreme Court Decision Syllabus (SCOTUS Podcast) · host RJ Dieken

Send us Fan MailCourts may not use ambiguous wording about consent to class arbitration to force class arbitration even over the idea of contra proferentem.Support the show

What this episode covers

Send us Fan Mail Courts may not use ambiguous wording about consent to class arbitration to force class arbitration even over the idea of contra proferentem. Support the show

NOW PLAYING

Lamps plus v Varela (forced class arbitration)

0:00 6:55

1×

No transcript for this episode yet

We transcribe on demand. Request one and we'll notify you when it's ready — usually under 10 minutes.

Share this episode

Similar Episodes

No similar episodes found.

Similar Podcasts

No similar podcasts found.

Frequently Asked Questions

How long is this episode of Supreme Court Decision Syllabus (SCOTUS Podcast)?

This episode is 6 minutes long.

When was this Supreme Court Decision Syllabus (SCOTUS Podcast) episode published?

This episode was published on April 24, 2019.

What is this episode about?