Litigation Update: State Legislatures, State Courts, and Federal Elections episode artwork

EPISODE · Jul 28, 2022 · 1H 2M

Litigation Update: State Legislatures, State Courts, and Federal Elections

from FedSoc Forums · host The Federalist Society

Who decides the rules for federal elections? The Constitution generally assigns that power to the “Legislature” of each state, but state courts are playing an increasing role. Recent elections have witnessed an increase in decisions applying broad provisions of state constitutions to override election laws and congressional maps adopted by legislators. That is what happened in Moore v. Harper, which the Supreme Court will hear in its upcoming term. Recently North Carolina gained a House seat, and its legislature adopted a new district map. The state’s supreme court deemed that map a partisan gerrymander and substituted in its place the court’s own map. That result, it concluded, was required by four separate parts of the state constitution, including clauses protecting the “freedom of speech” and guaranteeing “free” elections. Although the Supreme Court denied an emergency request to block that ruling for the 2022 election, it agreed to take the case to answer the broader question of state-court authority over the laws governing federal elections. Supporters of legislature primacy—often called the “independent state legislature” doctrine—say that a decision enforcing the doctrine will cut back on election-litigation gamesmanship, end the disruption of last-minute rule changes, and put primary responsibility back in the hands of democratically accountable legislators. Opponents, however, say that a decision for the state would threaten voting rights and democracy itself. Their Exhibit A: the Trump campaign’s failed strategy to convince state legislatures to overrule voters in the 2020 presidential election. This webinar will provide an overview of the legal debate, background on the Moore case, and discussion of the key issues and controversies that the Court will confront. Featuring: Andrew M. Grossman, partner at Baker & Hostetler LLP, co-leader of the firm’s Appellate and Major Motions practice, and Adjunct Scholar at the Cato Institute --- To register, click the link above

Who decides the rules for federal elections? The Constitution generally assigns that power to the “Legislature” of each state, but state courts are playing an increasing role. Recent elections have witnessed an increase in decisions applying broad provisions of state constitutions to override election laws and congressional maps adopted by legislators. That is what happened in Moore v. Harper, which the Supreme Court will hear in its upcoming term. Recently North Carolina gained a House seat, and its legislature adopted a new district map. The state’s supreme court deemed that map a partisan gerrymander and substituted in its place the court’s own map. That result, it concluded, was required by four separate parts of the state constitution, including clauses protecting the “freedom of speech” and guaranteeing “free” elections. Although the Supreme Court denied an emergency request to block that ruling for the 2022 election, it agreed to take the case to answer the broader question of state-court authority over the laws governing federal elections. Supporters of legislature primacy—often called the “independent state legislature” doctrine—say that a decision enforcing the doctrine will cut back on election-litigation gamesmanship, end the disruption of last-minute rule changes, and put primary responsibility back in the hands of democratically accountable legislators. Opponents, however, say that a decision for the state would threaten voting rights and democracy itself. Their Exhibit A: the Trump campaign’s failed strategy to convince state legislatures to overrule voters in the 2020 presidential election. This webinar will provide an overview of the legal debate, background on the Moore case, and discussion of the key issues and controversies that the Court will confront. Featuring: Andrew M. Grossman, partner at Baker & Hostetler LLP, co-leader of the firm’s Appellate and Major Motions practice, and Adjunct Scholar at the Cato Institute --- To register, click the link above

NOW PLAYING

Litigation Update: State Legislatures, State Courts, and Federal Elections

0:00 1:02:11

No transcript for this episode yet

We transcribe on demand. Request one and we'll notify you when it's ready — usually under 10 minutes.

REFRA REFRA www.refra.frCommunauté Francophone des Utilisateurs de RenoiseNous vous proposons : Le guide de démarrage rapide, traduit en français, et agrémenté de vidéos Le manuel de référence, traduit en français, 99% fidèle à l'original Des forums d'entraide, avec des trucs & astuces, et des tutoriels divers... (Formants filters, Wobble, Vocoder...) Une webradio diffusant des musiques faites avec Renoise Addressing Alaskans - Alaska Public Media Alaska Public Media Addressing Alaskans features local lectures, debates and forums recorded at live events taking place in and around Anchorage, Alaska. A variety of local organizations host speakers with topics that matter to the community. Sasquatch Chronicles Sasquatch Chronicles - Bigfoot Encounters People are seeing something in the woods and there are too many reports for this to be ignored. Join us every Sunday night as we discuss recent Sasquatch sightings, encounters and talk to Bigfoot eye witnesses. Listen as we speak with researchers, witnesses and investigators to unravel the mystery of Bigfoot. Every week we will also bring you the latest Bigfoot news and information.Additional episodes and exclusive content can be found on our website www.sasquatchchronicles.com. Become a Member today and receive access to additional exclusive shows posted weekly, our full back catalog of episodes, the ability to comment on Episodes and Blog entries, and access to our Forums. For the latest news, please visit our Blog. We can also be found on Facebook, Twitter, Instagram, Pinterest, and YouTube. BC Global Podcast Francis Limbe This Podcast is dedicated to the BC Global community and its listeners.BC Global is a nonprofit organization. its purpose is to serve as a platform to promote culture, education, economic, as well as peace and conflict resolution. We are a holistic community of thoughtful young leaders, entrepreneurs, human rights activists, who proactively share our skills, education knowledge interconnecting through our ecosystem of color, class, age, gender, religion, and beyond. To elevate ideas to solve socio-economic problems that cannot be solved or sustained without the diversity of thoughts, experiences, and expertise.We offer diverse music, discussion forums, peace-building, civic education, health, women, and children programs. All who desire to be a part of this work are welcome, regardless of religious preference or background. Founded: Oct. 8th, 2019Director : Francis LimbePhone # (909) 618-8336Email: [email protected]

Frequently Asked Questions

How long is this episode of FedSoc Forums?

This episode is 1 hour and 2 minutes long.

When was this FedSoc Forums episode published?

This episode was published on July 28, 2022.

What is this episode about?

Who decides the rules for federal elections? The Constitution generally assigns that power to the “Legislature” of each state, but state courts are playing an increasing role. Recent elections have witnessed an increase in decisions...

Can I download this FedSoc Forums episode?

Yes, you can download this episode by clicking the download button on the episode player, or subscribe to the podcast in your preferred podcast app for automatic downloads.
URL copied to clipboard!