Loper Bright and the End of Chevron Deference episode artwork

EPISODE · Jan 13, 2026 · 22 MIN

Loper Bright and the End of Chevron Deference

from Administrative Remedies

In this episode, Gwen and Marc examine Loper Bright v. Raimondo, the Supreme Court decision that formally overruled Chevron deference after forty years. They begin with an analogy about inconsistent babysitters to explain the core concern motivating the Court: agency interpretations that change across administrations, creating instability and unpredictability.They then turn to the facts of the case itself, involving a federal rule requiring herring fishing companies to pay for onboard observers. Under Chevron, the agency’s interpretation likely would have survived as reasonable. Instead, the Court used the case to eliminate Chevron entirely, holding that courts must exercise “independent judgment” when interpreting statutes—even when Congress has left ambiguity.From there, Gwen and Marc organize the critique of Loper Bright around three themes. First, they argue that the Court rewrote history by treating Chevron as a modern aberration, despite centuries of judicial deference to agency expertise. Second, they explain how the decision misunderstands modern governance, where Congress necessarily relies on agencies to interpret flexible statutory language. Third, they show how the practical consequences are already unfolding in the lower courts, producing circuit fragmentation rather than stability.Using concrete examples—from food labeling to labor law to environmental regulation—they illustrate how replacing agency expertise with judicial interpretation affects everyday life. The episode closes by exploring the democratic implications of shifting interpretive power from politically accountable agencies to life-tenured judges.What They Cover in This EpisodeThe facts behind Loper BrightHow Chevron worked and why it matteredThe Court’s reading of the APA“Independent judgment” and the “single best reading”Pre-Chevron history of judicial deferenceJudges as generalists versus agency expertsCircuit fragmentation after Chevron’s demiseDemocratic accountability and judicial power

NOW PLAYING

Loper Bright and the End of Chevron Deference

0:00 22:37

No transcript for this episode yet

We transcribe on demand. Request one and we'll notify you when it's ready — usually under 10 minutes.

No similar episodes found.

No similar podcasts found.

Frequently Asked Questions

How long is this episode of Administrative Remedies?

This episode is 22 minutes long.

When was this Administrative Remedies episode published?

This episode was published on January 13, 2026.

What is this episode about?

In this episode, Gwen and Marc examine Loper Bright v. Raimondo, the Supreme Court decision that formally overruled Chevron deference after forty years. They begin with an analogy about inconsistent babysitters to explain the core concern motivating...

Is there a transcript available for this episode?

Yes, a full transcript is available for this episode. You can read the complete transcript on the episode page.

Can I download this Administrative Remedies episode?

Yes, you can download this episode by clicking the download button on the episode player, or subscribe to the podcast in your preferred podcast app for automatic downloads.
URL copied to clipboard!