Michael Jackson Was Found Not Guilty — His Behavior Was Still Indefensible

Michael Jackson Was Found Not Guilty — His Behavior Was Still IndefensibleNetflix just dropped Michael Jackson: The Verdict — but the most damning parts of this story didn't make the cut. Behavioral analyst Matt Phifer breaks down everything the documentary left out, and what Michael Jackson's admitted behavior tells us regardless of what a jury decided.Get 15% off your first month of therapy with BetterHelp:👉 http://betterhelp.com/mattphifer🔔 New episodes every day — Subscribe so you never miss a case breakdown:👉 https://www.youtube.com/@CriminalMotives📝 Get exclusive case updates, & bonus analysis — join my free Substack:👉 https://substack.com/@criminalmotivesNetflix's Michael Jackson: The Verdict covers the charges, the trial, and the shocking not guilty verdict — but conveniently skips over Wade Robson's recanted testimony, the $20 million settlement, and the post-trial allegations that continued to surface for years. In this episode, behavioral analyst Matt Phifer reviews everything the doc missed and sits down with former federal prosecutor Nema Romani to break down why the prosecution lost despite having multiple witnesses. Matt also gives his behavioral analyst perspective on why Michael Jackson's admitted behavior — sharing a bed with children — was a boundary violation regardless of what happened in that courtroom.In This Episode:The critical evidence Netflix chose to leave out of Michael Jackson: The VerdictWhy the prosecution lost despite multiple victims and witnesses testifyingWade Robson testified in Michael's defense under oath — then reversed course entirely in 2013The $20 million settlement and what it signals from a behavioral standpointWhy a not guilty verdict is not the same as innocent — and why the behavior matters either way