Might the SCOTUS Case of Hunter v. US Potentially Help Mr. Allen?

Here we provide pure comments, opinions and speculations based on the First Amendment as to the "DelphI Appeal" of Richard Allen v. State of Indiana and discuss the rhetorical question if Mr. Allen might potentially benefit from a favorable ruling in favor of the Petitioner in the SCOTUS case of Hunter v. United States.Link to our content regarding Hunter v. US discussed in this podcast episode:https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3-D9e-wfB8Uhttps://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mKIGQlIZz-MEverything here represents the pure opinion, commentary, speculation and rhetorical questions per the First Amendment to the United States Constitution which states:Amendment ICongress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the government for a redress of grievances.It is codified within Section 107 of the U.S. Copyright Act,which provides that fair use of a work “for purposes such as criticism, comment, news reporting, teaching (including multiple copies for classroom use, scholarship, or research)” is not an infringement of copyright. ⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠#RichardAllen (https://www.youtube.com/hashtag/richa...) #Delphi (https://www.youtube.com/hashtag/delphi) #DelphiAppeal (https://www.youtube.com/hashtag/delph...) First Amendment, US ConstitutionUnder the Constitution of the United States, all persons charged with a crime are considered not guilty until or unless they (1) plead guilty or are (2) adjudicated guilty in a court of law.