MIT Prof. Ted Postol: Iranian Missiles vs Israeli Air Defense: Who Would Actually Win? episode artwork

EPISODE · Mar 11, 2026 · 1H 2M

MIT Prof. Ted Postol: Iranian Missiles vs Israeli Air Defense: Who Would Actually Win?

from Dialogue Works

Analysis of Middle East missile warfare examines claims that Iranian strikes have degraded US/Israeli air defenses by targeting critical early warning radars in the Persian Gulf. Technical breakdown explains how systems like THAAD, Patriot, and Aegis rely on large surveillance radars for target cueing—losses that reduce intercept capability and cut civilian warning times from ~10 minutes to under 2. Discussion covers the gap between missile defense marketing and operational reality, political vs. technical drivers in procurement, geopolitical ripple effects on US alliances in Asia and the Gulf, and Iran's decades-long preparation for conflict. Also addresses satellite early warning limitations and the resilience of Iran's military-technical infrastructure amid leadership losses. Hosted on Acast. See acast.com/privacy for more information.

Episode metadata supplied by the publisher feed · Published Mar 11, 2026

Embed this episode

NOW PLAYING

MIT Prof. Ted Postol: Iranian Missiles vs Israeli Air Defense: Who Would Actually Win?

0:00 1:02:16

No transcript for this episode yet

We transcribe on demand. Request one and we'll notify you when it's ready — usually under 10 minutes.

No similar episodes found.

Frequently Asked Questions

How long is this episode of Dialogue Works?

This episode is 1 hour and 2 minutes long.

When was this Dialogue Works episode published?

This episode was published on March 11, 2026.

Can I download this Dialogue Works episode?

Yes. Use the download control on the episode player to save the publisher-provided media file.
URL copied to clipboard!