No Word from Judge Hippler...Yet

Here, we discuss and opine for criticism, commentary, news reporting and educational/research purposes the purpose of our independent reporting of the investigation into the crimes at 1122 King Rd. & the Idaho v Kohberger. A review of the docket and case summary page reveals no new orders, notices of hearings, or other similar evidence from Judge Steven J. Hippler in response to recent out-of-court events regarding the case. Amend. I, U.S. Const. is quoted and cited to within this presentation which is comprised of pure opinion, commentary and speculation per the First Amendment. Everything here represents the pure opinion, commentary, speculation and rhetorical questions per the First Amendment to the United States Constitution which states:Amendment ICongress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the government for a redress of grievances.It is codified within Section 107 of the U.S. Copyright Act, which provides that fair use of a work “for purposes such as criticism, comment, news reporting, teaching (including multiple copies for classroom use, scholarship, or research)” is not an infringement of copyright#Idaho4#BryanKohberger#JudgeHippler#IdahovKohberger