Oral Argument: Esteras v. United States | Case No. 23-7483 | Date Argued: 2/25/25 episode artwork

EPISODE · Feb 25, 2025 · 1H 15M

Oral Argument: Esteras v. United States | Case No. 23-7483 | Date Argued: 2/25/25

from The High Court Report

Case Info: Esteras v. United States | Case No. 23-7483 | Date Argued: 2/25/25Link to Docket: Here.Background:The supervised-release statute, 18 U.S.C. § 3583(e), lists factors from 18 U.S.C. § 3553(a) for a court to consider when sentencing a person for violating a supervised release condition. In that list, Congress omitted the factors set forth in section 3553(a)(2)(A)-the need for the sentence to reflect the seriousness of the offense, promote respect for the law, and provide just punishment for the offense. Question Presented: Even though Congress excluded section 3553(a)(2)(A) from section 3583(e)'s list of factors to consider when revoking supervised release, may a district court rely on the section 3553(a)(2)(A) factors when revoking supervised release?Oral Advocates:For Petitioners: Christian J. Grostic, Assistant Federal Public Defender, Cleveland, Ohio. For Respondent: Masha G. Hansford, Assistant to the Solicitor General, Department of Justice, Washington, D.C.

Episode metadata supplied by the publisher feed · Published Feb 25, 2025

Embed this episode

NOW PLAYING

Oral Argument: Esteras v. United States | Case No. 23-7483 | Date Argued: 2/25/25

0:00 1:15:29

No transcript for this episode yet

We transcribe on demand. Request one and we'll notify you when it's ready — usually under 10 minutes.

No similar episodes found.

No similar podcasts found.

Frequently Asked Questions

How long is this episode of The High Court Report?

This episode is 1 hour and 15 minutes long.

When was this The High Court Report episode published?

This episode was published on February 25, 2025.

Can I download this The High Court Report episode?

Yes. Use the download control on the episode player to save the publisher-provided media file.
URL copied to clipboard!