Oral Argument: Great Lakes Ins. SE v. Raiders Retreat Realty Co. | Case No. 22-500 | Date Argued: 10/10/23 | Date Decided: 2/21/24 episode artwork

EPISODE · Oct 10, 2023 · 1H 10M

Oral Argument: Great Lakes Ins. SE v. Raiders Retreat Realty Co. | Case No. 22-500 | Date Argued: 10/10/23 | Date Decided: 2/21/24

from The High Court Report

Case Info: Great Lakes Ins. SE v. Raiders Retreat Realty Co. | Case No. 22-500 | Date Argued: 10/10/23 | Date Decided: 2/21/24Question Presented: Under federal admiralty law, can a choice of law clause in a maritime contract be rendered unenforceable if enforcement is contrary to the "strong public policy" of the state whose law is displaced?Holding: Choice-of-law provisions in maritime contracts are presumptively enforceable under federal maritime law, with narrow exceptions not applicable in this case.Result: Reversed.Voting Breakdown: 9-0. Justice Kavanaugh delivered the opinion for a unanimous Court. Justice Thomas filed a concurring opinion.Link to Opinion: Here.Oral Advocates:For Petitioner: Jeffrey B. Wall, Washington, D.C. For Respondent: Howard J. Bashman, Fort Washington, Pa.

Episode metadata supplied by the publisher feed · Published Oct 10, 2023

Embed this episode

Ready to play

Oral Argument: Great Lakes Ins. SE v. Raiders Retreat Realty Co. | Case No. 22-500 | Date Argued: 10/10/23 | Date Decided: 2/21/24

0:00 1:10:53

No transcript for this episode yet

We transcribe on demand. Request one and we'll notify you when it's ready — usually under 10 minutes.

No similar episodes found.

No similar podcasts found.

Frequently Asked Questions

How long is this episode of The High Court Report?

This episode is 1 hour and 10 minutes long.

When was this The High Court Report episode published?

This episode was published on October 10, 2023.

Can I download this The High Court Report episode?

Yes. Use the download control on the episode player to save the publisher-provided media file.
URL copied to clipboard!