Oral Argument: Mahmoud v. Taylor | Case No. 24-297 | Date Argued: 4/22/25 episode artwork

EPISODE · Apr 22, 2025 · 2H 29M

Oral Argument: Mahmoud v. Taylor | Case No. 24-297 | Date Argued: 4/22/25

from The High Court Report

Case Info: Mahmoud v. Taylor | Case No. 24-297 | Date Argued: 4/22/25Link to Docket: Here. Background:Respondent Montgomery County Board of Education requires elementary school teachers to read their students storybooks celebrating gender transitions, Pride parades, and same-sex playground romance. The storybooks were chosen to disrupt "cisnormativity" and "either/or thinking" among students. The Board's own principals objected that the curriculum was "not appropriate for the intended age group," presented gender ideology as "fact," "sham[ed]" students with contrary opinions, and was "dismissive of religious beliefs." The Board initially allowed parents to opt their kids out- but then reversed course, saying that no opt-outs would be permitted and that parents would not even be notified when the storybooks were read. Petitioners filed suit, not challenging the curriculum, but arguing that compelling their elementary-age children to participate in instruction contrary to their parents' religious convictions violated the Free Exercise Clause. Construing Wisconsin v. Yoder, the Fourth Circuit found no free-exercise burden because no one was forced "to change their religious beliefs or conduct." Question Presented:Whether public schools burden parents' religious exercise when they compel elementary school children to participate in instruction on gender and sexuality against their parents' religious convictions and with-out notice or opportunity to opt out.Oral Advocates:For Petitioners: Eric S. Baxter, Washington, D.C.; and Sarah M. Harris, Principal Deputy Solicitor General, Department of Justice, Washington, D.C. (for United States, as amicus curiae.)For Respondents: Alan E. Schoenfeld, New York, N.Y.Timestamps:00:00 Introduction00:05 Petitioner Opening Statement02:06 Petitioner Free for All Questions Begin18:38 Petitioner Sequential Questions Begin53:39 Petitioner Questions End, Government Opening Statement54:43 Government Free for All Questions Begin 1:04:21 Government Sequential Questions Begin01:22:12 Government Questions End, Respondent Opening Statement01:24:02 Respondent Free for All Questions Begin01:52:42 Respondent Sequential Questions Begin2:25:55 Respondent Questions End, Petitioner Rebuttal Begins

Episode metadata supplied by the publisher feed · Published Apr 22, 2025

Embed this episode

NOW PLAYING

Oral Argument: Mahmoud v. Taylor | Case No. 24-297 | Date Argued: 4/22/25

0:00 2:29:20

No transcript for this episode yet

We transcribe on demand. Request one and we'll notify you when it's ready — usually under 10 minutes.

No similar episodes found.

No similar podcasts found.

Frequently Asked Questions

How long is this episode of The High Court Report?

This episode is 2 hours and 29 minutes long.

When was this The High Court Report episode published?

This episode was published on April 22, 2025.

Is there a transcript available for this episode?

Yes, a full transcript is available for this episode. You can read the complete transcript on the episode page.

Can I download this The High Court Report episode?

Yes. Use the download control on the episode player to save the publisher-provided media file.
URL copied to clipboard!