Oral Argument: Martin v. United States | Case No. 24-362 | Date Argued: 4/29/25 episode artwork

EPISODE · Apr 29, 2025 · 52 MIN

Oral Argument: Martin v. United States | Case No. 24-362 | Date Argued: 4/29/25

from The High Court Report

Case Info: Martin v. United States | Case No. 24-362 | Date Argued: 4/29/25Link to Docket: Here.Background:Petitioners are the innocent victims of a wrong-house raid conducted by an FBI SWAT team in Atlanta, Georgia. Seeking a remedy for torts committed against them, Petitioners brought a cause of action against the United States under the Federal Tort Claims Act. In its opinion below, the Eleventh Circuit held that all of Petitioners' FTCA claims are barred by sovereign immunity supplied either through the Constitution's Supremacy Clause or the FTCA's discretionary-function exception. In one or more ways, the opinion below conflicts with decisions from every other circuit. Questions Presented: Whether the Constitution's Supremacy Clause bars claims under the FTCA-a federal statute enacted by Congress-when the negligent or wrongful acts of federal employees have some nexus with furthering federal policy and can reasonably be characterized as complying with the full range of federal law. Whether the FTCA's discretionary-function exception bars claims for torts arising from wrong-house raids and similar negligent or wrongful acts by federal employees.Oral Advocates:For Petitioners: Patrick M. JaicomoFor Respondents: Frederick Liu, Assistant to the Solicitor GeneralFor Court-Appointed Amicus Curiae in Support of Judgment Below on Question 1: Christopher E. MillsWebsite Link to Opinion Summary: Here.Apple Podcast Link to Opinion Summary: Here.Timestamps:00:00 Introduction00:05 Petitioner Opening Statement Begins02:11 Petitioner Free for All Questions Begin21:58 Petitioner Sequential Questions Begin22:06 Petitioner Questions End, Respondent Opening Statement Begins23:53 Respondent Free for All Questions Begin37:10 Respondent Sequential Questions Begin39:31 Respondent Questions End, Court Appointed Amicus Curiae Opening Statement Begins40:33 Court Appointed Amicus Curiae Free for All Questions Begin46:45 Court Appointed Amicus Curiae Sequential Questions Begin46:51 Petitioner Rebuttal Begins

Episode metadata supplied by the publisher feed · Published Apr 29, 2025

Embed this episode

NOW PLAYING

Oral Argument: Martin v. United States | Case No. 24-362 | Date Argued: 4/29/25

0:00 52:23

No transcript for this episode yet

We transcribe on demand. Request one and we'll notify you when it's ready — usually under 10 minutes.

No similar episodes found.

No similar podcasts found.

Frequently Asked Questions

How long is this episode of The High Court Report?

This episode is 52 minutes long.

When was this The High Court Report episode published?

This episode was published on April 29, 2025.

Can I download this The High Court Report episode?

Yes. Use the download control on the episode player to save the publisher-provided media file.
URL copied to clipboard!