Oral Argument: Perttu v. Richards | Case No. 23-1324 | Date Argued: 2/25/25 episode artwork

EPISODE · Feb 25, 2025 · 1H 16M

Oral Argument: Perttu v. Richards | Case No. 23-1324 | Date Argued: 2/25/25

from The High Court Report

Case Info: Perttu v. Richards | Case No. 23-1324 | Date Argued: 2/25/25Link to Docket: Here.Question Presented: In cases subject to the Prison Litigation Reform Act, do prisoners have a right to a jury trial concerning their exhaustion of administrative remedies where disputed facts regarding exhaustion are intertwined with the underlying merits of their claim?Oral Advocates:For petitioner: Ann M. Sherman, Solicitor General, Lansing, Mich. For respondent: Lori Alvino McGill, Charlottesville, Va.

Episode metadata supplied by the publisher feed · Published Feb 25, 2025

Embed this episode

NOW PLAYING

Oral Argument: Perttu v. Richards | Case No. 23-1324 | Date Argued: 2/25/25

0:00 1:16:16

No transcript for this episode yet

We transcribe on demand. Request one and we'll notify you when it's ready — usually under 10 minutes.

No similar episodes found.

No similar podcasts found.

Frequently Asked Questions

How long is this episode of The High Court Report?

This episode is 1 hour and 16 minutes long.

When was this The High Court Report episode published?

This episode was published on February 25, 2025.

Can I download this The High Court Report episode?

Yes. Use the download control on the episode player to save the publisher-provided media file.
URL copied to clipboard!