Oral Argument: Rico v. United States | Disappearing Defendant Dilemma episode artwork

EPISODE · Nov 3, 2025 · 55 MIN

Oral Argument: Rico v. United States | Disappearing Defendant Dilemma

from The High Court Report

Rico v. United States | Case No. 24-1234 | Oral Argument Date: 11/3/25 | Docket Link: HereOverviewToday, the Supreme Court hears oral arguments in Rico versus United States, the disappearing defendant dilemma examining when sentence clocks stop ticking. Isabel Rico went on the run during her 42-month release term. The government says her time on the run doesn't count toward her sentence.Question Presented: Whether the fugitive-tolling doctrine applies in the context of supervised release.Oral Advocates:For Petitioner: Adam G. Unikowsky, Washington, D.C.For Respondent: Joshua K. Handell, Assistant to the Solicitor General, Department of Justice, Washington, D.C.Timestamps:[00:00:00] Argument Overview[00:00:37] Argument Begins[00:00:45] Petitioner Opening Statement[00:02:30] Petitioner Free for All Questions[00:24:20] Petitioner Sequential Questions[00:24:35] Respondent Opening Statement[00:26:25] Respondent Free for All Questions[00:52:15] Respondent Sequential Questions[00:52:20] Petitioner Rebuttal

Episode metadata supplied by the publisher feed · Published Nov 3, 2025

Embed this episode

NOW PLAYING

Oral Argument: Rico v. United States | Disappearing Defendant Dilemma

0:00 55:11

No transcript for this episode yet

We transcribe on demand. Request one and we'll notify you when it's ready — usually under 10 minutes.

No similar episodes found.

No similar podcasts found.

Frequently Asked Questions

How long is this episode of The High Court Report?

This episode is 55 minutes long.

When was this The High Court Report episode published?

This episode was published on November 3, 2025.

Can I download this The High Court Report episode?

Yes. Use the download control on the episode player to save the publisher-provided media file.
URL copied to clipboard!