Prostate Cancer: Laparoscopic v. Open Procedures episode artwork

EPISODE · Aug 8, 2008 · 12 MIN

Prostate Cancer: Laparoscopic v. Open Procedures

from Clinician's Roundtable

Host: Mark Nolan Hill, MD Guest: Jim Hu, MD, MPH Research indicates that demand for minimally invasive prostatectomy is growing, from 12 percent to more than 30 percent of our candidate patients over a recent two-year span. But research also tells us that there are still drawbacks to a laparoscopic approach to prostate cancer. What are the immediate and enduring pitfalls to laparoscopy, and are these concerns outweighed by the perceived benefits? Dr. Jim Hu, assistant professor of surgery at Harvard Medical School, and director of minimally invasive urologic oncology at Brigham and Women's Hospital and the Dana Farber Cancer Institute in Boston, explains why some surgeons may stick with the open procedure, even as others move ahead with the laparoscopic approach. Dr. Mark Nolan Hill hosts.

Episode metadata supplied by the publisher feed · Published Aug 8, 2008

Embed this episode

NOW PLAYING

Prostate Cancer: Laparoscopic v. Open Procedures

0:00 12:59

No transcript for this episode yet

We transcribe on demand. Request one and we'll notify you when it's ready — usually under 10 minutes.

No similar episodes found.

No similar podcasts found.

Frequently Asked Questions

How long is this episode of Clinician's Roundtable?

This episode is 12 minutes long.

When was this Clinician's Roundtable episode published?

This episode was published on August 8, 2008.

Can I download this Clinician's Roundtable episode?

Yes. Use the download control on the episode player to save the publisher-provided media file.
URL copied to clipboard!