PubReading [127] - Insufficient Evidence for ‘‘Autism-Specific’’ Genes - S. Myers, D. Ledbetter episode artwork

EPISODE · May 18, 2022 · 42 MIN

PubReading [127] - Insufficient Evidence for ‘‘Autism-Specific’’ Genes - S. Myers, D. Ledbetter

from PubReading

Despite evidence that deleterious variants in the same genes are implicated across multiple neurodevelopmental and neuropsychiatric disorders, there has been considerable interest in identifying genes that, when mutated, confer risk that is largely specific for autism spectrum disorder (ASD). Here, we review the findings and limitations of recent efforts to identify relatively ‘‘autism-specific’’ genes, efforts which focus on rare variants of large effect size that are thought to account for the observed phenotypes. We present a divergent interpretation of published evidence; discuss practical and theoretical issues related to studying the relationships between rare, large-effect deleterious variants and neurodevelopmental phenotypes; and describe potential future directions of this research. We argue that there is currently insufficient evidence to establish meaningful ASD specificity of any genes based on large-effect rare-variant data. - doi.org/10.1016/j.ajhg.2020.04.004 - 2020

Episode metadata supplied by the publisher feed · Published May 18, 2022

Embed this episode

NOW PLAYING

PubReading [127] - Insufficient Evidence for ‘‘Autism-Specific’’ Genes - S. Myers, D. Ledbetter

0:00 42:12

No transcript for this episode yet

We transcribe on demand. Request one and we'll notify you when it's ready — usually under 10 minutes.

No similar episodes found.

No similar podcasts found.

Frequently Asked Questions

How long is this episode of PubReading?

This episode is 42 minutes long.

When was this PubReading episode published?

This episode was published on May 18, 2022.

Can I download this PubReading episode?

Yes. Use the download control on the episode player to save the publisher-provided media file.
URL copied to clipboard!