RE: Hunter v. United States & a National Policy on Appellate Waivers episode artwork

EPISODE · Mar 4, 2026 · 5 MIN

RE: Hunter v. United States & a National Policy on Appellate Waivers

from Kathy's InDieZoNe · host Kathy DiTondo

Here we provide pure opinions, comments, speculations and rhetorical questions addressing the Supreme Court case of Hunter v. United States, a Petition for Writ of Certiorari where a man who pled guilty sought to challenge his waiver of appeal rights. Hunter has been joined by a number of groups who have filed amicus briefs in the Supreme Court including one group's brief referenced by Justice Alito and defense counsel. On March 3, 2026 SCOTUS entertained Hunter v. US, the first criminal appellate waiver proceeding heard by SCOTUS since 2019's Garza v. Idaho. The case seeks to expand the grounds to appeal when appellate rights are waived in guilty pleas to include on due process grounds citing to the Fifth Amend. U.S. Constitution which is made applicable to state proceedings such as that of Idaho v. Kohberger through the 14th Amendment's Due Process Clause.LINK to March 3, 2026 Oral Argument: https://www.supremecourt.gov/oral_arguments/argument_transcript/2025LINK to court file in Hunter v. United States:https://www.supremecourt.gov/docket/docketfiles/html/public/24-1063.htmlLink to our playlist/presentations on certain filings in Hunter v. United States:https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=eCPeb8GDCjQ&list=PLbLUtgSDXdFMfRIZfgBw6syRpeqd5V8vUA ruling from SCOTUS is expected on or before the end of June 2026. Everything here represents the pure opinion, commentary, speculation and rhetorical questions per the First Amendment to the United States Constitution which states:Amendment Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the government for a redress of grievances.It is codified within Section 107 of the U.S. Copyright Act, which provides that fair use of a work “for purposes such as criticism, comment, news reporting, teaching (including multiple copies for classroom use, scholarship, or research)” is not an infringement of copyright. All parties who are charged with crimes are considered innocent under the eyes of the law until or unless they (1) are adjudicated guilty in a court of law or (2) agree to plead guilty.LINK: Replay of SCOTUS Oral Argument, Hunter v. United States: https://www.supremecourt.gov/oral_arguments/argument_transcript/2025

Episode metadata supplied by the publisher feed · Published Mar 4, 2026

Embed this episode

NOW PLAYING

RE: Hunter v. United States & a National Policy on Appellate Waivers

0:00 5:11

No transcript for this episode yet

We transcribe on demand. Request one and we'll notify you when it's ready — usually under 10 minutes.

No similar episodes found.

No similar podcasts found.

Frequently Asked Questions

How long is this episode of Kathy's InDieZoNe?

This episode is 5 minutes long.

When was this Kathy's InDieZoNe episode published?

This episode was published on March 4, 2026.

Can I download this Kathy's InDieZoNe episode?

Yes. Use the download control on the episode player to save the publisher-provided media file.
URL copied to clipboard!