Reification, mental illness, and the N.D.I.S.: what do the roles mean?

I provide my content free of charge. If you enjoy it and want to show your appreciation, please consider making a small donation — it means the world to me! Donate at the link shown below.https://www.paypal.com/donate/?hosted_button_id=3LY8DB82U3EMSIs the way that psychology conceptualises mental health always accurate? Could the way we reify be limiting our understanding? In this episode, I continue the discussion from the last episode, but this time exploring whether different mental health roles really do (or should) have different goals, using the Australian National Disability Insurance Scheme (N.D.I.S.) as an example.Note: no part of this content should be accepted as giving advice of any kind. For advice, please seek professional guidance.ReferencesAustralian Health Ministers’ Advisory Council (2013). “A national framework for recovery-oriented mental health services”. https://www.health.gov.au/sites/default/files/documents/2021/04/a-national-framework-for-recovery-oriented-mental-health-services-guide-for-practitioners-and-providers.pdfCambridge University Press & Assessment (2024). “Recovery”. https://dictionary.cambridge.org/dictionary/english/recoveryNational Disability Insurance Scheme (2021). “Psychosocial Disability Recovery‑Oriented Framework”. https://www.ndis.gov.au/media/3957/download?attachmentN.D.I.S. Quality and Safeguards Commission (2019). “Positive behaviour support capability framework: For NDIS providers and behaviour support practitioners”. Penrith, Australia. https://www.ndiscommission.gov.au/pbscapabilityframework