Research Review: Anecdote vs. Statistical Information episode artwork

EPISODE · Feb 17, 2022 · 9 MIN

Research Review: Anecdote vs. Statistical Information

from Clinically Pressed Podcast · host Clinically Pressed

Trying to convince someone that a certain technique, item or program is the most effective can be a daunting task. There are many ways in which to communicate the information but which way is most effective? Telling stories and testimonials? Or getting them the hard facts and statistics about why something works? In this research review we looks at that very question and provides some insight on when and where to use different types of information to help make your case. Reference: Freling, T. H., Yang, Z., Itani, O. S., & Abualsamh, R. B. (2020). When poignant stories outweigh cold hard facts: A meta-analysis of the anecdotal bias. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 160. (51-67) www.clinicallypressed.com #complicatedsimple #resultsthatgiveback #progressive #openminded #EBP #noagenda #performance #training #nutrition #health #wellness #athlete #athletictraining #science #chiropractic #rehab #prevention #clinicallypressed #leadership #concussion #stats #facts #anecdotes #information

Episode metadata supplied by the publisher feed · Published Feb 17, 2022

Embed this episode

NOW PLAYING

Research Review: Anecdote vs. Statistical Information

0:00 9:47

No transcript for this episode yet

We transcribe on demand. Request one and we'll notify you when it's ready — usually under 10 minutes.

No similar episodes found.

No similar podcasts found.

Frequently Asked Questions

How long is this episode of Clinically Pressed Podcast?

This episode is 9 minutes long.

When was this Clinically Pressed Podcast episode published?

This episode was published on February 17, 2022.

Can I download this Clinically Pressed Podcast episode?

Yes. Use the download control on the episode player to save the publisher-provided media file.
URL copied to clipboard!