EPISODE · Jun 6, 2026 · 13 MIN
Rutherford v. United States (Compassionate Relief)
from Supreme Court Decision Syllabus (SCOTUS Podcast) · host Attorney RJ Dieken, Loki Esq Law, Montana
Send us Fan MailHeld: When Congress declines to make a sentencing amendment retroactive—as with the change to §924(c)—the resulting sentencing disparity cannot serve as an “extraordinary and compelling” reason that warrants a sentence reduction under 18 U. S. C. §3582(c)(1)(A)(i). Pp. 8–17.Support the show
What this episode covers
Send us Fan Mail Held: When Congress declines to make a sentencing amendment retroactive—as with the change to §924(c)—the resulting sentencing disparity cannot serve as an “extraordinary and compelling” reason that warrants a sentence reduction under 18 U. S. C. §3582(c)(1)(A)(i). Pp. 8–17. Support the show
NOW PLAYING
Rutherford v. United States (Compassionate Relief)
No transcript for this episode yet
Similar Episodes
Mar 26, 2026 ·1m
Jan 2, 2026 ·47m
Dec 21, 2025 ·46m