Silencing Scholarship—How Institutional Review Boards Chill Free Speech episode artwork

EPISODE · Jun 19, 2025 · 19 MIN

Silencing Scholarship—How Institutional Review Boards Chill Free Speech

from Unwritten Law

In this episode of Unwritten Law, NCLA’s Mark Chenoweth and John Vecchione are joined by NCLA’s Margot Cleveland to discuss a groundbreaking lawsuit against the University of Tennessee’s Institutional Review Board (IRB).The case centers on Idil Issak, a cultural anthropology PhD student barred from conducting dissertation research on domestic worker abuse in the UAE—research purely involving interviews and speech.Margot explains how IRBs, created to prevent unethical medical experiments, have morphed into unconstitutional gatekeepers for academic speech. They dive into why this case matters beyond Tennessee, highlighting the chilling effects these boards have nationwide on scholars who dare to investigate sensitive topics without official approval.

Episode metadata supplied by the publisher feed · Published Jun 19, 2025

Embed this episode

NOW PLAYING

Silencing Scholarship—How Institutional Review Boards Chill Free Speech

0:00 19:48

No transcript for this episode yet

We transcribe on demand. Request one and we'll notify you when it's ready — usually under 10 minutes.

No similar episodes found.

Frequently Asked Questions

How long is this episode of Unwritten Law?

This episode is 19 minutes long.

When was this Unwritten Law episode published?

This episode was published on June 19, 2025.

Can I download this Unwritten Law episode?

Yes. Use the download control on the episode player to save the publisher-provided media file.
URL copied to clipboard!