Temporal Stability and Convergent Validity of Risk Preference Measures (Bagaïni et al., 2025) episode artwork

EPISODE · Feb 16, 2025 · 17 MIN

Temporal Stability and Convergent Validity of Risk Preference Measures (Bagaïni et al., 2025)

from Revise and Resubmit - The Mayukh Show · host Mayukh Mukhopadhyay

Welcome toRevise and Resubmit, the podcast where research meets curiosity, and every paper is an open question waiting for deeper exploration.Today, we’re diving into a fascinating puzzle at the heart of decision-making:Is risk preference a stable trait, or does it shift over time like sand beneath our feet?Risk is everywhere—investments, career moves, even that extra drink at the bar. But how do we actually measure it? And more importantly, do those measurements hold up over time? In their paper,A Systematic Review and Meta-Analyses of the Temporal Stability and Convergent Validity of Risk Preference Measures, published inNature Human Behaviour, authors Alexandra Bagaïni, Yunrui Liu, Madlaina Kapoor, Gayoung Son, Paul-Christian Bürkner, Loreen Tisdall, and Rui Mata take on this question by analyzing a staggering579,114 respondents across358 different measures of risk preference.Their findings? Some measures appear stable, others waver unpredictably, and—most surprisingly—many don’t even agree with each other. What does this mean for how we understand risk-taking behavior? And if we can’t trust our measurements, how do we truly know what it means to be "risk-averse" or "risk-seeking"?We’ll unpack all of this today. But first—are you someone who sticks to safe bets, or do you embrace uncertainty? And is that really a part of who youare... or just who you areright now?A huge thank you to the authors andSpringer Nature for this thought-provoking research. If you enjoyed this episode, don’t forget to subscribe toRevise and Resubmit onSpotify, and check out our YouTube channel,Weekend Researcher. We’re also available onAmazon Prime andApple Podcasts—so wherever you get your research deep dives, we’re there.Now, let’s get into it.ReferenceBagaïni, A., Liu, Y., Kapoor, M. et al. A systematic review and meta-analyses of the temporal stability and convergent validity of risk preference measures. Nat Hum Behav (2025). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41562-024-02085-2Youtube Channel⁠https://www.youtube.com/@weekendresearcher⁠Support us on Patreonhttps://patreon.com/weekendresearcher

Welcome toRevise and Resubmit, the podcast where research meets curiosity, and every paper is an open question waiting for deeper exploration.Today, we’re diving into a fascinating puzzle at the heart of decision-making:Is risk preference a stable trait, or does it shift over time like sand beneath our feet?Risk is everywhere—investments, career moves, even that extra drink at the bar. But how do we actually measure it? And more importantly, do those measurements hold up over time? In their paper,A Systematic Review and Meta-Analyses of the Temporal Stability and Convergent Validity of Risk Preference Measures, published inNature Human Behaviour, authors Alexandra Bagaïni, Yunrui Liu, Madlaina Kapoor, Gayoung Son, Paul-Christian Bürkner, Loreen Tisdall, and Rui Mata take on this question by analyzing a staggering579,114 respondents across358 different measures of risk preference.Their findings? Some measures appear stable, others waver unpredictably, and—most surprisingly—many don’t even agree with each other. What does this mean for how we understand risk-taking behavior? And if we can’t trust our measurements, how do we truly know what it means to be "risk-averse" or "risk-seeking"?We’ll unpack all of this today. But first—are you someone who sticks to safe bets, or do you embrace uncertainty? And is that really a part of who youare... or just who you areright now?A huge thank you to the authors andSpringer Nature for this thought-provoking research. If you enjoyed this episode, don’t forget to subscribe toRevise and Resubmit onSpotify, and check out our YouTube channel,Weekend Researcher. We’re also available onAmazon Prime andApple Podcasts—so wherever you get your research deep dives, we’re there.Now, let’s get into it.ReferenceBagaïni, A., Liu, Y., Kapoor, M. et al. A systematic review and meta-analyses of the temporal stability and convergent validity of risk preference measures. Nat Hum Behav (2025). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41562-024-02085-2Youtube Channel⁠https://www.youtube.com/@weekendresearcher⁠Support us on Patreonhttps://patreon.com/weekendresearcher

NOW PLAYING

Temporal Stability and Convergent Validity of Risk Preference Measures (Bagaïni et al., 2025)

0:00 17:35

No transcript for this episode yet

We transcribe on demand. Request one and we'll notify you when it's ready — usually under 10 minutes.

Frequently Asked Questions

How long is this episode of Revise and Resubmit - The Mayukh Show?

This episode is 17 minutes long.

When was this Revise and Resubmit - The Mayukh Show episode published?

This episode was published on February 16, 2025.

What is this episode about?

Welcome toRevise and Resubmit, the podcast where research meets curiosity, and every paper is an open question waiting for deeper exploration.Today, we’re diving into a fascinating puzzle at the heart of decision-making:Is risk preference a stable...

Can I download this Revise and Resubmit - The Mayukh Show episode?

Yes, you can download this episode by clicking the download button on the episode player, or subscribe to the podcast in your preferred podcast app for automatic downloads.
URL copied to clipboard!