The Case For Not Letting Outrage Do Your Thinking
from The Case For... (with Matthew Campobasso) Hosted by matthew.r.campobasso
Outrage is everywhere right now—and it’s powerful. It mobilizes you fast. It also makes you sloppy. In this episode, Matt Campobasso pulls from his time as a prosecutor and litigator to make a simple case: the internet is basically one endless opening statement, and we keep doing what a courtroom would never allow—entering verdicts before the evidence is in. Headlines hit like grenades, quiet updates get ignored, and we walk around feeling certain… without actually knowing the whole story. Matt breaks down why outrage is so addictive (that hit of righteousness), why it clouds judgment, and how moral certainty can turn into a shortcut to punishment. You’ll get a practical framework—including the “mirror test” and the Righteousness Checklist—to slow the temperature down in real time and stay curious long enough to find the truth. The takeaway: care fast, judge slow. Treat headlines like opening statements. Wait for evidence. And the next time your thumb hovers over “share,” ask the one question every courtroom demands: Do I have any evidence?
Embed this episode
No transcript yet.