EPISODE · Jun 5, 2026
United States v. Milaro
from DIFTCL: Federal Narrative Summaries · host Do It For The Caselaw
Background Michael Milaro appealed a judgment from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas. The Federal Public Defender appointed to represent him filed a motion to withdraw and submitted a brief in accordance with Anders v. California and United States v. Flores. The court’s reasoning The court reviewed the counsel’s brief and the relevant portions of the record. The judges concurred with counsel’s assessment that the appeal presents no nonfrivolous issue for appellate review. What it means going forward The appeal is dismissed, and the appointed counsel is excused from further responsibilities in the case.
Embed this episode
NOW PLAYING
United States v. Milaro
No transcript for this episode yet
Similar Episodes
No similar episodes found.
Similar Podcasts
No similar podcasts found.