EPISODE · Jun 5, 2026
United States v. Ortiz
from DIFTCL: Federal Narrative Summaries · host Do It For The Caselaw
Background Mauro Cortez Ortiz appealed a judgment from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas. The Federal Public Defender appointed to represent him moved for leave to withdraw and filed a brief in accordance with Anders v. California and United States v. Flores. The court’s reasoning The court reviewed counsel’s brief and the relevant portions of the record. The court concurred with counsel’s assessment that the appeal presents no nonfrivolous issue for appellate review. What it means going forward The appeal is dismissed, and the appointed counsel is excused from further responsibilities in the case.
Embed this episode
NOW PLAYING
United States v. Ortiz
No transcript for this episode yet
Similar Episodes
No similar episodes found.
Similar Podcasts
No similar podcasts found.