United States v. Ortiz episode artwork

EPISODE · Jun 5, 2026

United States v. Ortiz

from DIFTCL: Federal Narrative Summaries · host Do It For The Caselaw

Background Mauro Cortez Ortiz appealed a judgment from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas. The Federal Public Defender appointed to represent him moved for leave to withdraw and filed a brief in accordance with Anders v. California and United States v. Flores. The court’s reasoning The court reviewed counsel’s brief and the relevant portions of the record. The court concurred with counsel’s assessment that the appeal presents no nonfrivolous issue for appellate review. What it means going forward The appeal is dismissed, and the appointed counsel is excused from further responsibilities in the case.

Episode metadata supplied by the publisher feed · Published Jun 5, 2026

Embed this episode

NOW PLAYING

United States v. Ortiz

0:00 0:00

No transcript for this episode yet

We transcribe on demand. Request one and we'll notify you when it's ready — usually under 10 minutes.

No similar episodes found.

No similar podcasts found.

Frequently Asked Questions

When was this DIFTCL: Federal Narrative Summaries episode published?

This episode was published on June 5, 2026.

Can I download this DIFTCL: Federal Narrative Summaries episode?

Yes. Use the download control on the episode player to save the publisher-provided media file.
URL copied to clipboard!