Week 18 — PI Discipline, Procedural Fairness, & the Limits of Flexibility episode artwork

EPISODE · May 4, 2026 · 48 MIN

Week 18 — PI Discipline, Procedural Fairness, & the Limits of Flexibility

from Willem Hoyng's UPC Unfiltered (AI) Podcast · host HOYNG ROKH MONEGIER

This week, our AI hosts break down Prof. Willem Hoyng’s expert commentary on a wide range of new decisions from the Unified Patent Court, with a clear focus on procedural discipline, case management, and the practical realities of UPC litigation.In this episode, we cover:⚖️ PI Proceedings & Claim Interpretation: A detailed look at Stratasys v Bambulab, where the Hague Local Division refused a PI based on a narrow interpretation rooted in prosecution history and enforced strict procedural discipline.📄 Suspensive Effect & Evidence Production: The Court of Appeal in Polytechnik v Dall confirms that suspensive effect is exceptional and reinforces the importance of early confidentiality planning in disclosure orders.🧩 Auxiliary Requests & Revocation Strategy: Teleflex v Speedcare raises important questions about the limits of auxiliary request practice at the UPC and the risks of importing EPO-style approaches into litigation.⏱️ Deadlines, Mistakes & Procedural Fairness: In Optopol v Topcon, the Court of Appeal confirms that genuine procedural errors can be corrected, but also underlines the importance of diligence and proportionality.🛠️ Judge-Rapporteur & Case Management: Dai Nippon v Zapp and Cup&Cino v Alpina illustrate the central role of the Judge-Rapporteur in maintaining procedural order - and what happens when parties fail to follow the Rules.💰 Security for Costs & Litigation Reality: In Suinno v Microsoft and Adobe v Keeex, the Court of Appeal clarifies both the purpose of security for costs and the strict approach to appeal admissibility and deadlines.🔍 Equivalence & Substantive Patent Law: AIM Sport v TGI provides insight into the UPC’s evolving approach to equivalence, highlighting ongoing uncertainty and debate around the appropriate legal test.📖 Read the full written analysis here: https://www.hoyngrokhmonegier.com/news-insights/detail/upc-unfiltered-by-willem-hoyng-upc-decisions-week-18-2026🔍 Explore the case law and Unfiltered Commentary on our UPC Intelligence Platform: https://upcintelligence.hoyngrokhmonegier.com/ Disclaimer: This post and the podcast are AI-generated. The commentary reflects Prof. Willem Hoyng’s personal views.

Episode metadata supplied by the publisher feed · Published May 4, 2026

Embed this episode

NOW PLAYING

Week 18 — PI Discipline, Procedural Fairness, & the Limits of Flexibility

0:00 48:57

No transcript for this episode yet

We transcribe on demand. Request one and we'll notify you when it's ready — usually under 10 minutes.

No similar episodes found.

No similar podcasts found.

Frequently Asked Questions

How long is this episode of Willem Hoyng's UPC Unfiltered (AI) Podcast?

This episode is 48 minutes long.

When was this Willem Hoyng's UPC Unfiltered (AI) Podcast episode published?

This episode was published on May 4, 2026.

Can I download this Willem Hoyng's UPC Unfiltered (AI) Podcast episode?

Yes. Use the download control on the episode player to save the publisher-provided media file.
URL copied to clipboard!