Why does swallowed anger come back as a storm — and what it cost my marriage? episode artwork

EPISODE · Jul 14, 2026 · 11 MIN

Why does swallowed anger come back as a storm — and what it cost my marriage?

from Divorced me Podcast · host Missy Rönsch

[From my diary]December, 29th 2019Today, we went cross-country skiing on the Sněžka plateau. Up there, the view is stunningly beautiful: the dark emerald green of the pine trees, covered in snow, white but with blue undertones and tiny sun reflections, light yellow and flickering. The more stunning is the fact that I exploded again, just out of nothing. Or maybe skiing triggered it, as any sport—as I am bad at any sport, which always upsets me—triggers my self-pitifulness. It is the second time I explode like this. The first time happened on a random evening at home, after we had gone to bed. But it followed the same pattern: I had no idea where it came from, but it felt like a tornado of rage that twisted and turned me and made me scream. This time, we were passing through a beautiful winter forest, as I felt an urge to let it all out. The only similarity is that both times it was about his family.Anger that erupts “out of nowhere” is usually anger that accumulated from small grievances left unspoken, compressed over time until they exceed what you can hold. It surfaces in the unguarded moments — in bed on a cozy evening, on a beautiful trail — not because those moments trigger it, but because ease is when the effort of suppressing it finally slips.And then the emotions feel like a tornado — mixed, sudden, strong — because the actual trigger was never acknowledged.Rage has solid roots …The relationship researcher John Gottman has argued that most of a couple’s conflicts are not solvable problems but perpetual ones — recurring tensions rooted in difference, the same fault line surfacing again and again. The clinician Daniel Wile put it more bluntly: choosing a partner means choosing a particular set of unsolvable problems.Rage never comes from nothing; it comes from things that went unspoken long enough to compress. The psychologist James Gross has spent decades studying what he calls expressive suppression — the strategy of holding a feeling in, keeping it off the face and out of the room. His central finding is that suppression does not make the feeling go away. The emotion continues underneath, often at full strength, while the work of holding it down accumulates its own cost.… but bad timingSuppression is not a drain that empties. It is a lid that can get blown away one day. Interestingly, the blow is not triggered by any violent blast; the lid gives in when the pressure drops. That’s what makes it feel so contraintuitive.Which is why the timing in the entry is not random, even though it looks that way. Both eruptions came in moments of safety and ease — after we had gone to bed, or on a stunningly beautiful trail through a winter forest. Those are exactly the moments when the lid slips, because holding a feeling down takes continuous effort, and ease is when the effort lapses. There was no task to perform, no face to keep. Very probably, those unguarded, loving moments were the only times I felt safe enough to let any of my rage out at all.Illustration provided by Supportive StrangerThus, the storm did not arrive despite the beauty and the closeness. It arrived because of them — because they were the only conditions under which it was permitted.Unspoken conflicts and boundariesIn-laws are among the most common causes of tensions in a couple. But it’s not so simple as it seems. Funnily, the “direction” of the relationship between the spouse and the in-laws plays a crucial role.Terri Orbuch, following 373 couples across twenty-six years, found that when a husband felt close to his wife’s family, the couple’s divorce risk dropped by about twenty percent — but when a wife felt close to her husband’s family, the risk rose by roughly the same amount. Her explanation was about boundaries: a wife who is close to her husband’s parents often finds it harder to set limits with them, and over time can come to experience that closeness as interference — as meddling in the very role, wife, that she is still trying to define.A tornado with no nameA tornado is formless, total, and external; it happens to you. That is what an emotion looks like when it has never been given a name; when you never confess to yourself that you do have negative feelings, but stack them into some hidden place in your soul, where they feed off each other, until their synergy makes them strong enough to come out.Emotions that did not receive enough recognition from you will push you back. You need to learn to talk one emotion from another: not the abstract emotions, but the ones that you feel.The psychologist Lisa Feldman Barrett calls this capability emotional granularity — the capacity to tell one’s feelings apart with precision, to distinguish disappointed from dismissed from resented from afraid. People low in emotional granularity tend to experience strong feeling as an undifferentiated mass, a general “bad,” rather than a specific emotion pointing at a specific cause. And precision really helps here: research on affect labeling, much of it by Matthew Lieberman, finds that putting a feeling into words — especially exact words — measurably lowers its intensity.Feel the difference: I am furious that his family did this, and that he did not take my side is a sentence with edges; it can be answered. A tornado of rage from nowhere is weather. The grievance had never been named precisely enough to become anything but a storm, and in a storm you easily get lost.Good girls don’t screamSadly, on top of all the confusion, what I did with my anger was to route it, instantly, into self-criticism. The rage becomes my self-pitifulness; the trigger becomes my being bad at any sport. A feeling that was, by my own account, about his family is converted into evidence of my own defectiveness. That conversion is itself the finding.The clinician Harriet Lerner has written for decades about exactly this move — that women are widely taught to fear their own anger and to turn it inward, recasting a legitimate grievance as a personal flaw, because the flaw feels safer to hold than the grievance. Anger, in her account, is not noise to be ashamed of. It is information: a signal that something is being violated, that a boundary or a sense of fairness is under strain. When a person reliably translates he, or his family, did something that hurt me into something is wrong with me, it usually means that saying the first version aloud has felt unsafe, or pointless, or has gone badly before.Illustration provided by Supportive StrangerSo the work the entry points to is NOT learning to suppress the tornado more skillfully. It is letting the anger keep its original trigger — the unknown thing about his family — long enough to find out what it was actually trying to say. I could not do that at the time. I could only explode, and then hand the blame to the one person in the story least responsible for the fault line: myself.What it doesn’t meanIt does not mean his family were villains, either: the anger marks where I felt the line crossed, not that anyone set out to cross it. Even now, I cannot say for sure what the issue was. The honest possibilities are mostly ordinary ones — divided loyalties, unspoken expectations, two sides reading each other wrong across a language I was not raised in and a set of family codes that were never quite mine. The research makes the point in passing: closeness can be experienced as meddling whether or not any meddling was meant. It is entirely possible that there were no villains here at all — only a fault line, and a misunderstanding that no one managed to name in time.What it sadly means is that the spouse witnessing such “tornado” during peaceful moments, may feel bad—in different ways—and withdraw emotionally in the future as they start to “fear” that a short sunlight is always followed by a miserably strong rain.I write these reflections while building Supportive Stranger, a small iOS app for journaling through the moments when a feeling arrives unannounced and faster than you can handle it.Thanks for reading Divorced me! Subscribe for free to receive new posts. This is a public episode. If you would like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit divorcedme.substack.com

Episode metadata supplied by the publisher feed · Published Jul 14, 2026

Embed this episode

Ready to play

Why does swallowed anger come back as a storm — and what it cost my marriage?

0:00 11:06

No transcript for this episode yet

We transcribe on demand. Request one and we'll notify you when it's ready — usually under 10 minutes.

No similar episodes found.

No similar podcasts found.

Frequently Asked Questions

How long is this episode of Divorced me Podcast?

This episode is 11 minutes long.

When was this Divorced me Podcast episode published?

This episode was published on July 14, 2026.

Can I download this Divorced me Podcast episode?

Yes. Use the download control on the episode player to save the publisher-provided media file.
URL copied to clipboard!