Will AI Replace HR While Bosses Keep Plans Vague on Purpose?

Jerremy Alexander Newsome and Dave Conley discuss how AI is reshaping hiring, arguing that blasting resumes into automated systems misses the human connection and that networking and informational interviews still matter. Kathryn, who works in HR ops, says much of her job (emails and core systems) could be replaced by AI, while many HR ops peers feel resilient because they’ll manage and direct AI; she adds company messaging about AI is vague and five-year plans are unclear, possibly intentionally. She cites legal risk from AI misuse, calls today’s interview process “tragic” with extreme multi-round demands even for junior roles, and says internal mobility is limited. Kathryn describes a murky career landscape, the difficulty of job-hopping or switching industries, and her boyfriend’s year-plus search that ended via family connections. She notes peers seeking housing and financial stability, often staying put, and daydreams about a land-and-coffee-shop life while weighing it against traditional career paths.Timestamps:(00:00) AI is already changing the hiring room – blasting resumes misses human connection that still decides offers(01:10) Large parts of HR ops emails and systems are replaceable by AI – peers think they’ll just manage the AI instead(03:42) Today’s interview process is tragic – extreme multi-round demands for even junior roles(05:36) The career social contract is being rewritten in real time – job-hopping and industry switches feel impossible(15:05) Many daydream about buying land and opening a coffee shop – stability and community now compete with traditional paths🌍 Connect with us: Instagram | YouTube | X