Skip to content
Zeroing in on what makes adversarial examples possible episode artwork

EPISODE · Jan 20, 2020 · 22 MIN

Zeroing in on what makes adversarial examples possible

from Linear Digressions · host Katie Malone

Adversarial examples are really, really weird: pictures of penguins that get classified with high certainty by machine learning algorithms as drumsets, or random noise labeled as pandas, or any one of an infinite number of mistakes in labeling data that humans would never make but computers make with joyous abandon. What gives? A compelling new argument makes the case that it’s not the algorithms so much as the features in the datasets that holds the clue. This week’s episode goes through several papers pushing our collective understanding of adversarial examples, and giving us clues to what makes these counterintuitive cases possible. Relevant links: https://arxiv.org/pdf/1905.02175.pdf https://arxiv.org/pdf/1805.12152.pdf https://distill.pub/2019/advex-bugs-discussion/ https://arxiv.org/pdf/1911.02508.pdf

Episode metadata supplied by the publisher feed · Published Jan 20, 2020

Embed this episode

Ready to play

Zeroing in on what makes adversarial examples possible

0:00 22:51

No transcript for this episode yet

We transcribe on demand. Request one and we'll notify you when it's ready — usually under 10 minutes.

No similar episodes found.

Frequently Asked Questions

How long is this episode of Linear Digressions?

This episode is 22 minutes long.

When was this Linear Digressions episode published?

This episode was published on January 20, 2020.

Can I download this Linear Digressions episode?

Yes. Use the download control on the episode player to save the publisher-provided media file.
URL copied to clipboard!