ChannelBuzz.ca

Jim Moschos, national sales director of technology finance at Mitsubishi HC Capital Canada Canadian businesses buying servers and IT infrastructure are facing a difficult combination of higher hardware costs, currency pressure and continuing uncertainty in the technology supply chain. The result is serious sticker shock for many SMB customers, with some putting off infrastructure projects or looking for ways to reduce the immediate impact of a refresh. But delaying technology investments indefinitely may not make the problem go away. As Jim Moschos, national sales director of technology finance at Mitsubishi HC Capital Canada, puts it, “Kicking the can down the road doesn’t really help because that can could become a dumpster.” On this edition of In The Channel, Moschos discusses how financing can help managed service providers and VARs keep projects moving while giving customers more manageable payment options. He explains how assignment models can move the underwriting burden away from the solution provider, allowing smaller channel firms to pursue larger opportunities without taking on unnecessary customer credit risk. Moschos also discusses asset buybacks, which can use the residual value of existing equipment to help offset the cost of a hardware refresh. And he highlights an under-discussed opportunity in software and cybersecurity: using financing to bridge the gap between vendors offering discounts for three- to five-year upfront commitments and SMB customers that are more comfortable with annual operating budgets. For channel partners, financing is not simply a way to lease a server. Used strategically, it can support cash flow, protect margins, improve the customer conversation and create new ways to structure infrastructure and software deals. Read Full Transcript Robert Dutt: Hello and welcome to In The Channel from ChannelBuzz.ca, bringing news and information to the Canadian IT channel community for the last 16 years. I’m Robert Dutt, editor of ChannelBuzz.ca, and your host for the show. Today we’re talking about money, and specifically, how to find it and use it when the macroeconomic picture gets messy. Right now, Canadian IT buyers are facing a serious squeeze. The weak Canadian dollar, tariffs, and a global memory shortage have driven up the cost of hardware. And that means serious sticker shock for customers, especially in the SMB space. But freezing IT projects and waiting to see what happens isn’t a great strategy. Joining me to discuss how solution providers can use financing to navigate these choppy waters is Jim Moschos. He’s the national sales director of technology finance at Mitsubishi HC Capital Canada. We discuss how financing has moved way beyond just leasing a server, how partners can eliminate their own underwriting risk, and how to use financing to capture multi-year software discounts for clients who only have annual budgets. Let’s get right into it. My chat with Jim Moschos. Jim, thanks for taking the time. I appreciate it. Jim Moschos: Well, I appreciate being here, Robert. Thank you. Thank you for the invite. Robert Dutt: To start with, let’s take a look at the macro environment. Canadian buyers are currently facing a variety of things going on. It takes me back to the very meme-able movie Airplane! scene — it looks like I picked the wrong week to quit sniffing glue, to borrow from the film. We’ve had the tariff situation, the Canadian dollar hovering around $1.40, and prices in general being driven up by the global memory shortage situation. From your vantage point, how is all of that impacting IT purchasing behavior, especially in the SME space right now? Jim Moschos: Yes. What we’re seeing is two dynamics in terms of customer types and their responses. We have a few that are playing a wait-and-see game, which means they’re going to be waiting a long time. From the dynamics you mentioned, I think if, hopefully, God willing, there’s an end to the war soon, I think we’ll see the U.S. dollar subside, as right now its main strength is due to safe-haven demand. But the other items you mentioned in terms of trade negotiations and supply shortages, that’s not a near-term solution. The negotiations will probably last well into the end of this year, if not beyond. And the supply shortage, they’re talking about 2027 through possibly 2030, depending on how strong the demand is. The people that are putting projects on hold, I think they’re going to have a bigger hill to climb later on if they’re thinking that prices are going to subside. On the other end of the spectrum, we have the types of clients that are wanting to lock in the pricing now. Rates right now are still relatively low. The Bank of Canada’s holding rates, our swap lines are relatively stable. I think taking advantage of the lower rate environment, and also coupled with pricing certainty — even though the prices have gone up, they could go up even higher — so we’re seeing a lot of people locking in the orders, leveraging financing, for example, as a way to be able to absorb the increase within a structured payment plan that makes sense for them. And we’re certainly seeing some prominent solution providers advising clients, and vendors as well, advising would-be customers to spec out what you want early, get it for the life of the machine, don’t bet on this changing in the short term, and don’t bet on it getting better. So that’s another factor. I think kicking the can down the road doesn’t really help because that can could become a dumpster. Robert Dutt: For MSPs and VARs sitting in the middle of this, how do you see this volatility affecting their product pipelines, their own cash flow, those kinds of things — basically running the business? Jim Moschos: For those that haven’t entertained financing before, because only a small percentage of IT hardware and software is actually financed still to this day, relatively speaking, in comparison to other industries. I think that having conversations with lenders in terms of understanding their business model and their go-to-market strategy, and trying to identify a financial vehicle that works for them in a way they can optimize their cash flow. There’s also things that can be done creatively, that if they’re investing in product, for example, or used to fulfill certain contracts, there’s things we can do in terms of possibly taking a security interest or assignment of those contracts. So the VAR isn’t actually carrying the entire burden of the underwriting themselves. We can actually leverage it, potentially, the end user. But then again, that depends on the situation as well as when it needs to be further investigated, but there are potential solutions that we can look into. Robert Dutt: I wanted to pull on that. It’s funny that you mentioned that the usage in technology, particularly through the channel, is lower than you see in other industries. Certainly, I hear regularly from vendors pushing on their captive financing arms. I hear from the distributors on what they’re able and willing and wanting to do in terms of financing. There’s yourself and your peers who are coming at it from your point of view as pure-play finance companies. What is it that you think has historically driven that lower-than-one-might-expect rate of usage of financing in tech compared to other industries? Jim Moschos: I think traditionally, people have high relationships with their key contact at an organization. Typically, it’s in the SME within IT that they’re used to going, understanding, solving a project. And they would then get the capital funds allocated, then strike a PO, and then the PO will be fulfilled. That person that they’re talking to may not necessarily be well-versed to position financing within the organization, coupled with the fact that the VAR themself might not be providing those conversations. What is required is to have conversations with broadening their contact base within their accounts, talking to people within finance, and having those conversations. We try to educate our partners in terms of having those conversations. And if they don’t feel comfortable, we’re more than happy to have those conversations with them, to their customers, so we can help position the benefits of payment plans. Robert Dutt: I think a lot of solution providers might think of tech financing as something they offer to the end user, to lease a server, or lease a solution, say. But as I understand it, you guys work directly with the channel on supply chain as well. You did a little bit of this, but can you break down a bit more on how you historically have worked with solution providers? Jim Moschos: Not necessarily — that was a one-size-fits-all. We have a myriad of financial offerings. It depends on what their go-to-market strategy is and where the payment points are for themselves or for their customers. There’s a complexity spectrum going on. I guess on the simple end of the spectrum, we can offer basic financing solutions for their end users, whether it’s capital lease, loan, operating lease, what have you. And on the other end of the spectrum, we can get into more complex assignment models, where we would take assignment of their documents to their customers and underwrite the end users and monetize either the entire agreement or a portion of the agreement. And then you have solutions in between, whether they’re bundled solutions, pass-through, we get into some guaranteed residuals, things of that nature. So again, there is a myriad of ways we can go about it. It all depends on the situation, the unique situation of the VAR, what they’re trying to accomplish. Robert Dutt: Obviously, this is an ecosystem that’s very concerned with the fact that it is an ecosystem. When a solution provider brings you into a deal or uses supply chain financing from someone like you guys, how does that change the relationship with the vendor? They’re ultimately selling to the customer and perhaps the distributor that’s facilitating sitting in the middle there. Jim Moschos: I think it enhances it. In terms of the relationship, I think it gives the vendors and the customer possibly some comfort that they are a small and mid-size VAR, that they have somebody, for me personally, for our partners, to have somebody the size of Mitsubishi with a strong balance sheet supporting them. I think it gives individuals that kind of comfort. Robert Dutt: Let’s talk about the situation today. Basically, how can Canadian solution providers use some of the financing mechanisms available to them right now to shield themselves from currency fluctuation, from supply chain volatility, from all this madness that’s going on in the world? Jim Moschos: By leveraging financing, I think it gives these solution providers pricing certainty. It allows them to lock in certain payment plans and rates over a period of time, or the useful life of the product. If they are looking for some sort of short-term financing or longer terms or more flexible options, to opt for operating leases or provide low payments with a good amount of back-end flexibility, depending on if they want the ability to trade up or hedge against technology obsolescence, we can offer operating leases to help again with that pricing certainty, at least in the short term. Another thing that’s kind of where we’re seeing some good traction over the last little while, and what’s overlooked, is the financing of software. We’re seeing more and more organizations opting to finance their, let’s say, three-year, five-year cybersecurity licenses, for example, where you have some OEMs that are offering some attractive discounts for multi-year agreements. The problem there is that they want their money upfront. You might be used to paying $100,000 a year for a cybersecurity license. The OEM might come to you and say, “Instead of paying $300,000 the next three years, we’ll give you an offer of $260,000,” for example, and you’re thinking, “That’s great. However, I don’t have — like, I only budget $100, I don’t have $260 now.” And where we kind of help bridge the gap, where we’ll put together a three-year agreement and the interest is really nominal to the point that they still realize a substantial benefit from that. It’s kind of a win-win in a situation where the OEM gets their money upfront and the VAR gets that pricing certainty and that discount. We’re seeing more VARs, more end users financing these types of software scenarios. Robert Dutt: When I’m sitting across the table from an SMB customer as a VAR, MSP, owner or salesperson, and they’re having serious sticker shock about a hardware refresh in particular, how do I change the sales conversation? How do I use some of the financing that’s available to soften that blow, redirect the customer’s mindset away from that as much as possible and just kind of get to the yes? Jim Moschos: If they currently own the assets, we look at ways that we can soften the blow. We could actually look at acquiring the assets that are unencumbered and put that towards the cost of the new acquisition and reduce the payments. We also look at ways of structuring the payments and possibly doing step payments where they might not have the money in the budget this year, but they could have more budget next year. We could structure a payment plan that is more acceptable for them and their cash flow and their budgeting. We could also look at, again, like I mentioned before, potentially doing operating leases, which is on the technology side with flexibility in the backend, lowers their payments, which again provides an easier entry into doing a refresh. Robert Dutt: The other side of this, I guess, for channel business owners, for VAR, MSP founders, owners, principals who are listening to this and trying to plan out their hardware strategies amidst all of these various uncertainties, what’s your biggest piece of advice on how they should be managing their capital in this moment? Jim Moschos: Based on what we discussed from the top of the call in terms of the macro environment, I would highly suggest trying to preserve cash, look at financing models, have those discussions early with their financing partner, try to identify what model makes most sense for them, whether it’s capital leases, a loan structure, operating leases, depending on what the use is for the product and how long they intend on keeping it, refresh cycle, etc. Don’t discount the possibility of financing software for ones that make sense. Kind of open the lens beyond hardware and look at software as well. Just have those conversations early with their finance partner. I don’t think there’s a one-size-fits-all approach. I think it depends on the unique requirements of the particular partners. Robert Dutt: Last one for me. If I’m a solution provider listening to this and I want to learn more about what Mitsubishi can do to support my business, to do creative things, to help me figure out all of this stuff, where do I go? Jim Moschos: Well, that’s an easy one. They can go to our website at landingca.mhccna.com/tech-finance. We have a pretty robust website, but I’d be more than happy to — if they want to reach out to me directly and have a discussion, I’d be more than happy to take their call or their email. My email is [email protected]. They can email me anytime and I’ll get back to them as soon as I can and have a good discussion with them. Robert Dutt: Jim, I appreciate your taking the time. Good luck with helping channel partners through all this fun stuff. Jim Moschos: Thanks, Robert. Appreciate that. Thank you for having me. Robert Dutt: There you have it, Jim Moschos from Mitsubishi HC Capital Canada. I’d like to thank Jim for his time. I thought his point about bridging the gap on multi-year software and cybersecurity deals was quite timely given the circumstances. If your vendor is giving you a major discount for a three-to-five-year upfront commitment, but your customer can only stomach annual operational expenses, bringing in a finance partner to take the upfront hit while you secure the margin and protect your customer is a brilliant way to solve the problem for everyone involved. Thank you, as always, to all of you listening. If you enjoyed the show, please do follow or subscribe. We’re on Apple Podcasts, Spotify, YouTube, and pretty much everywhere else you find podcasts. Ratings and reviews are always hugely appreciated. Until next time, I’m Robert Dutt for ChannelBuzz.ca, and I’ll see you in the channel. Bye.

Lynn Smurthwaite-Murphy, CEO of Plugable The IT channel is no stranger to consumer brands attempting to make the leap into the B2B world, but few have navigated it as deliberately as Plugable. Originally known as a digital-native brand that built its reputation on Amazon, the connectivity and peripherals vendor is now turning its full attention to the channel. On this episode of In The Channel, Plugable chief executive officer Lynn Smurthwaite-Murphy – a familiar face to Canadian partners from her time leading Westcon Canada – explains how the company is translating its consumer success into a reliable, low-friction offering for managed service providers. She notes that surviving the brutal review ecosystem on Amazon forced Plugable to build highly reliable, extensively tested products, which today translates into fewer helpdesk tickets for MSPs managing complex, mixed-vendor desktop environments. We also discuss the recent strategic investment from Acer Gadget. Smurthwaite-Murphy shares how this partnership gives Plugable the global supply chain muscle it needs to expand while remaining strictly vendor-neutral. Finally, we touch on a massive hardware innovation for the artificial intelligence era. Smurthwaite-Murphy shares details on Plugable’s upcoming Thunderbolt 5 AI enclosure, a modular hardware solution that promises to bring workstation-class, local AI processing power to standard laptops, giving MSPs a practical way to deploy AI hardware without relying entirely on emerging AI PCs. Read Full Transcript ROBERT DUTT: Hello and welcome to In The Channel from ChannelBuzz.ca, bringing news and information to the Canadian IT channel community for the last 16 years. I’m Robert Dutt, editor of ChannelBuzz.ca, and your host for the show. Today, we’re talking about the desktop edge and how a brand born on Amazon is making waves in the IT channel. My guest is Lynn Smurthwaite-Murphy, the chief executive officer of Plugable. Many of you will recognize Lynn from her deep roots here in the Canadian channel, including her time leading Westcon Canada. She joined Plugable a few years ago to help them transition from a prosumer favourite to a serious B2B player. We discuss why their trial by fire in the consumer review space actually makes their docking stations and peripherals perfect for MSPs looking to reduce help desk tickets in mixed hardware environments. We also dig into their recent investment from Acer Gadget and get a really exciting scoop on a new Thunderbolt 5 AI enclosure that gives partners a modular way to deploy serious local AI processing power. Let’s get right into it. My chat with Lynn Smurthwaite-Murphy. ROBERT DUTT: Tim, thanks for taking the time. It’s great to talk to you again. LYNN SMURTHWAITE-MURPHY: Yeah, it’s great to talk to you again as well. It’s been many years, we were just establishing. ROBERT DUTT: It has been a while, probably more than either of us would like to admit, but such is. A lot of our listeners will obviously know you from your time leading Westcon Canada and then your work at StarTech.com after that. Can you kind of walk us through your journey from the distribution side of the house to where you are now at the helm of Plugable? LYNN SMURTHWAITE-MURPHY: Yeah, actually it’s been interesting because I started out at a service provider and then I spent many years at Westcon, and then I went to a vendor brand, which is where I’m at now as well. So you kind of get this 360-degree view of the channel and it’s been really interesting. I’ve been very fortunate. So about five years ago, I joined Plugable as the CEO and we’ve been undergoing a whole transformation. I mean, I can go into it if you want now, a little bit about why I joined the company, but I don’t want to jump on any questions you have. ROBERT DUTT: No, I appreciate that. And yeah, this would be a great time to do that. What did you see there? And I guess especially… yeah, let’s just start there. LYNN SMURTHWAITE-MURPHY: Yeah. So Plugable was known, and some of the channel partners do think of us as an Amazon seller. But what I loved about the… I mean, we were watching them closely because we were always competing with them when I was at StarTech.com. But what they really are is a data company, an e-commerce company, and they were founded on Amazon. So I saw this digital native that suddenly was showing up in the channel and the channel was asking for the Plugable products and I was like, what’s going on there? And I was very interested. And as I was talking to the founder, he really wanted to expand. We had this… what was happening was the Chinese factory brands were beginning to show up on Amazon and, I mean, they’re fine products, but the solutions are extremely broad compatibility for business. So suddenly I started noticing a lot of business in our point of sale and we invested in a whole channel team and we wanted to grow to this omnichannel wherever the business customers buy. And so I found it a very interesting business model. And I think that kind of leads to where we are today. It was sort of demand from the channel side of things. ROBERT DUTT: Interesting, because I was curious what kind of drove the strategic decision to go from the kind of direct-to-consumer and prosumer Amazon-centric brand to the sort of formalizing and B2B IT channel and making that kind of the bread and butter, it seems. LYNN SMURTHWAITE-MURPHY: Yeah. I mean, there were these factors that were happening. As I mentioned, there was disruption in the B2C side and then suddenly businesses are looking at the solution. And I think what interested me the most is the channel has a very broad portfolio that they’re responsible for with the customer. They can’t be master of every brand. And so they want, specifically in peripherals, they want something that they know will work and it’s easy to figure out what the compatibility is. So you had these two things coming together at the same time. And this company had to be built and survive and thrive with customers never talking to a customer yet selling something fairly complicated. So they had to do it all digitally. And that’s where I found… I think the channel was being asked for us initially because customers were doing online research, right? The B2B buyer’s journey is changing. And so they were asking for us and that’s kind of how it all began. ROBERT DUTT: How do you take that digital-only or digital-first kind of culture in terms of marketing, in terms of… well, there isn’t really so much enablement, but documentation support for customers… and turn that into channel enablement and all the stuff that one has to do when one’s working through the VAR or MSP channel? LYNN SMURTHWAITE-MURPHY: Yeah, great question. So there’s a team of us that came over that had spent our career in the channel. So we knew what the channel required from a channel program, channel support. And so we started with distribution and made sure that we were in the right distribution partners and that we had our inventory available and that we were listed properly. And then we were supporting the channel. They knew how to reach us. And so it’s been that journey, and marketing programs and events, doing all that. And now, as the whole modern desk is becoming disrupted again, and so much more is being expected of it, things are becoming more complicated. It was time for us to hire a field team. And that field team can help generate leads for the channel, but also can help support the customers. That’s where we are today. We’re on this multi-year journey of transforming to a B2B company, which now the majority of our business is through the channel, which now we are all-channel as well. I consider Amazon a channel. We don’t take any share of the world. ROBERT DUTT: Especially with that talent in place and that muscle motion in place now, how do you address some of the classic partner concerns that I’m sure have come up? Deal reg, margin protection, MDF, especially when Amazon is part of the channel, but it is also a visible competitor to a lot of the folks who are in the VAR/MSP space. LYNN SMURTHWAITE-MURPHY: Oh, great question. And it’s interesting, the channel partners ask us that every time they see us. And we do a little test. We say, let’s go online right now and let’s look at Amazon and several partners’ listings. And I challenge you to find where there’s a different price, where the channel is at a disadvantage. And it’s because we came from an Amazon partner to a channel partner, we have really good control over our pricing. So that’s number one. And then we were able to build a channel pricing strategy and promotion that we knew, coming from the channel, we knew would work. And so we’ve got a multi-tier channel program. We’re able to do volume opportunities, jam programs, and deal reg, all of that. ROBERT DUTT: You sat in the distributor’s chair for a long time. And as you point out, you were on the partner side for a while before that. How does that background inform the way you operate a vendor today? What kind of distribution and partner lessons, as well as the overall insights that you mentioned bringing in with the team, does that kind of background in distribution apply to how Plugable goes to market today? LYNN SMURTHWAITE-MURPHY: That’s a great question. Some of it might just be muscle memory, but I think I understand what makes both the service provider MSP and the distributor tick. And so I think we’re trying to make sure that we’re a really good partner to both of those constituents and try to deliver what they need and work with them in the way that they want. Even if you’re making price changes, for example, with the distributor, you know to do that at a timing that works with them. So we’re trying to be easy to work with. ROBERT DUTT: Price changes in a timely fashion in 2026 might be a little bit of a different discussion than it was a few years ago, but… LYNN SMURTHWAITE-MURPHY: Well, we went through the pandemic and that was kind of chaotic times. And we’re entering into a whole new chaotic time, really driven by AI. But anyway, you were asking about price changes. ROBERT DUTT: No, I was just making the observation that it’s certainly a different beast this year as a result of AI and RAMageddon and all that fun stuff that’s going on. LYNN SMURTHWAITE-MURPHY: Oh, absolutely. I mean, I was just… our founder and chief technology officer is over in Asia. He’s been over there for quite a while and it’s evolving. It’s an evolving story, but there are component level shortages that are beginning to rear, even more than I think people understood, and more than just the memory. So it’s where the pandemic we knew was going to end. We knew that it was a peak and valley and the demand and the constraint, but this is going to be sustained, at least for the foreseeable future. ROBERT DUTT: Grab your helmet, folks. LYNN SMURTHWAITE-MURPHY: That’s right. Fasten your seatbelt. ROBERT DUTT: A lot of folks in the solution provider community and MSPs are hyper-focused on SaaS, on cybersecurity, on cloud, on AI. Sometimes I think they think of peripherals as an afterthought, something that gets tacked on there. Why should they be paying more attention to this space? What are the opportunities or where are the margin dollars that they might not realize they’re leaving on the table in a deal if they’re not thinking about the kind of stuff that you guys are bringing to market? LYNN SMURTHWAITE-MURPHY: Yeah, that’s a great question because, I mean, let’s face it, peripherals are not that sexy until somebody really realizes they need them. So you’ve got a few things happening, right? The modern desk is being disrupted, as we mentioned, by AI, but also by the demand for productivity. People are using more applications than ever, so they need multi-screens. So just at the very core, you get a new laptop because you had to upgrade it for AI or just for Windows 11. Now you need new peripherals. But those are also… you’re adding more devices, more screen space. And that screen is probably running… one of them is probably running AI. And so the modern desk could be anywhere. It could be hybrid, in a hybrid environment in terms of work. And then every office you go into, I defy you to find one that is 100% one brand, one GPU, one set of devices that you have to connect to. So let’s just assume that 95% of the environments are hybrid in some way. That’s what third-party docking station companies like ours do best. We work in a mixed environment because we have to work and test deeply for compatibility. Where if you’re buying the bundle, the OEM plus the OEM dock, that’s great for that particular one use. But if you’re in a hybrid environment, you’re plugging in different devices, is it going to work? Are you going to lose productivity? Are you going to have a poor customer experience? So there’s a lot of demand and complexity that’s being added to the modern desk. And the IT department, they don’t have the capacity to deal with that. They don’t have the time or the capacity. And so we also take those calls from the channel, we take the calls from the end user. “Doesn’t work?” We take them locally. ROBERT DUTT: I think that points out an interesting side of things that I hadn’t really thought of. My first thought is kind of as an upsell opportunity for a partner who’s selling a solution, selling hardware, tag on the peripherals to build a total deal size and hopefully raise TCO as well. But it sounds like you’re saying there’s an opportunity to potentially, if done right, offload some of the inevitable help desk tickets that come with, “My monitor won’t turn on,” or, “Well, when I’m plugged into this thing, it feels like my data transfer is slower than it is, even though it’s the same kind of connector.” Well, no, it’s not. It’s actually USB. It’s all USB-C, but that one, you’re used to Thunderbolt 3 or 4, and this is something lower. So it sounds like there’s a cost reduction opportunity there too. LYNN SMURTHWAITE-MURPHY: Yeah. I mean, as a business leader, I also had to pay for help desks in my P&L. And so I can attest to the fact that I’ve got those people busy trying to do rollouts or IT upgrades, or I don’t want them working on these little minor things, but I also don’t want my staff not being able to get connected. And there are stats that say people lose five, seven minutes every time they try to connect to a meeting, especially if they’re running in. So yes, I’m talking the productivity and user experience and cost savings, but also you mentioned the channel margin. And we do offer a higher margin. That’s something that if the channel partner is not thinking about the margin opportunity by just adding peripherals. And then when you add third-party peripherals… ROBERT DUTT: Let’s talk about the current situation, the recent investment from Acer Gadget. Tell me a bit about how that partnership came about and what does it mean for you guys in terms of R&D and roadmap and where things go. LYNN SMURTHWAITE-MURPHY: Yeah, that’s great. We were so excited. Both parties just really are so complimentary. They’re global. They’ve got a global footprint. They’ve got brand halo that we really were pleased to partner with. And then supply chain stability, opportunity to access even a broader supply chain. And for Acer Gadget and Acer, we represent an agnostic, highly compatible device that could work in their environments, as well as a B2B and an e-commerce company and innovation. Some of the innovation that we’re doing, they really appreciated, specifically around the Thunderbolt 5 AI enclosure and some of that innovation. So we consider it more of a strategic partnership than we do a finance partnership. Although there is benefit there as well, which helped fund the field team that we’re announcing that we’ve hired. That’s for an example. ROBERT DUTT: It sounds like you say Acer values the agnosticism, as you describe it. That sounds like Plugable remains and the strategy is to remain pretty strictly vendor-neutral when it comes to docking and connectivity. LYNN SMURTHWAITE-MURPHY: Absolutely. They would like the brand to remain agnostic. ROBERT DUTT: You already mentioned the AI enclosure. You mentioned how AI is changing the desktop. How are you guys thinking about where AI is at now and where it’s going in the future in terms of what it means for what you do and where you see Plugable? LYNN SMURTHWAITE-MURPHY: Yeah, again, I think the modern desk is completely being disrupted and there’s so much more demand on it. AI PCs right now don’t have the power to run local models. What we’re seeing is in the cloud, there’s billions of dollars being spent on AI in the cloud and there’s going to be a lot of use case for that. But as we move to privacy, and privacy almost seems like it’s a little bit secondary right now. People are racing to leverage AI, but at some point there’s going to be big news. People will focus a little bit more on the privacy piece and what needs to stay local. You’ve got the capability of the hardware getting better and the GPUs being able to manage more, but also the models. The models are becoming more optimized. At some point, you’re going to have this come together where local is going to be a real option for people. It’s somewhere between now and 18, 24 months, it’s going to become more mainstream where there’s going to be repeatable or local workflows that need to be local. It could be because of token usage, it could be just because of privacy, but it’s going to be there. We wanted to get ahead of it. We’ve been on the bleeding edge of AI for our own company and we’ve got a really interesting roadmap, but the first launch was our Thunderbolt enclosure where we offered two solutions. One was the one for developers where you build your own local AI, and then we built an enterprise version where it’s intended to be plug-and-play AI. We’ve got a whole software stack and we wrote a chat harness. People in the channel can adopt this to drive a use case for AI and maybe give themselves an opportunity to have a seat at the table for the broader AI spend because use cases right now are where we’re not seeing successful proof of concepts. ROBERT DUTT: I guess from a peripheral point of view, it’s become an accepted and normal thing for docking to potentially include storage on board or directly connected. Why not have some processing as well and get into that AI boost? Then hopefully, I’m guessing the logic is I can have a less beefy machine hooked up to that and still get the better AI outcomes. LYNN SMURTHWAITE-MURPHY: That’s right. It works today with the Windows PC that you have where, if you were going with… first off, it’s 50 times more powerful than an AI PC. It depends what you’re trying to run. You can chat on an AI PC. You can’t run models. If you wanted to buy then a local solution like a DGX Spark, for example. Those are nice. They’re all built in one, but you have to use Linux. So you’ve got to add another operating system and it’s not modular. I know a lot of companies are trying to figure out when and how they get in and they don’t want to spend and then not be viable in the next couple of years. So ours is a modular solution. It works with the PC you have. It depends on the use case, what you’re trying to do. ROBERT DUTT: Given your roots, I have to ask about the distribution strategy in Canada. You said one of the first steps was to lock down what you want to do in distribution. Where are you at in Canada today and how are you approaching getting products into the hands of Canadian partners and getting in front of them and letting them know what you guys are up to? LYNN SMURTHWAITE-MURPHY: Being here in Canada, we have about a third of our company population is Canadian. We’re nicely straddling North America as a North American company. So right now we’re in Ingram and we’re in the works of launching another distributor and we’re expanding our channel here. As part of our expanding a new field team, we also expanded our channel team. ROBERT DUTT: What is the end… I imagine given what you said it’s probably a pretty broad array, but what does the ideal Plugable partner look like? What are some of the common threads for a successful partner for you? LYNN SMURTHWAITE-MURPHY: Well, it’s changing with the AI solution because with the AI solution, it’s got to be a partner probably within the Global 1000 that has an AI consulting development already because the beauty of that is it needs a channel partner to hook up all the data through MCP. They’ve got to integrate it and support it. But most of our partners are traditional partners. If you name one, we’re probably being sold by them. We initially started out where partners that had more of an e-commerce play, we were doing very well there, and then it’s just continued to expand. ROBERT DUTT: Last one for me. You’ve touched on this a little bit with the AI side of things, but what are the main priorities for Plugable over the next 12 to 18 months in terms of both building the market and the product roadmap? And I guess finally, your message to Canadian partners who might be hearing about Plugable for the first time? LYNN SMURTHWAITE-MURPHY: Ah, let’s unpack that. So what’s on the roadmap? Well, with this partnership with Acer Gadget and Acer, we will be expanding our product line. In the past we had to kind of choose an either-or and we spent a lot of time on innovation last year. Well, now we can do both. And so we’re going to be launching more new products this year than we have in a while. So we’re pretty excited about that. We want to continue to expand our footprint globally and we now have a path to do that faster. So basically they’re enabling us to accelerate our strategy. And then if I were a Canadian partner, what’s Plugable? I think what we’re told by the channel partners we work with is that A, we bring in more new business than most of our competitors because we’re being asked for by their customer. And B, we have the lowest return rate because it just works. And I really believe that that’s our digital native being born on Amazon. You live and die by your reviews. And if you don’t have this whole cycle process of taking the feedback, improving, improving, re-spinning and making sure that you’re listening to the customer’s user experience feedback and improving it, you’re not going to do well. So we bring that to a business-grade solution. So I think we’re low friction for a partner. ROBERT DUTT: Fascinating, especially fascinating as things continue to develop in terms of what you’re able to add to the PC as AI models get closer to the machine. Lynn, fascinating catching up and good luck with Plugable. LYNN SMURTHWAITE-MURPHY: Thank you so much. It’s been great to catch up. ROBERT DUTT: There you have it, Lynn Smurthwaite-Murphy from Plugable. I’d like to thank Lynn for her time. And as always, thank you for listening. It’s fascinating to hear how a company weaponizes its Amazon background. Usually the consumer origin is something vendors tend to try to hide when they pivot to the channel, but Lynn makes a compelling case that surviving the consumer review gauntlet creates exactly the kind of bulletproof hardware that MSPs need. And that Thunderbolt 5 AI enclosure is definitely something to keep an eye on as we all try to figure out the hardware realities of this AI wave. If you enjoyed this episode, please follow or subscribe to the channel on Apple Podcasts, Spotify, YouTube, wherever you get your podcasts. Leaving a rating or review also helps us as well. Until next time, I’m Robert Dutt for ChannelBuzz.ca, and I’ll see you in the channel. Bye.

Today’s headline news for Canadian IT solution providers: TD Synnex: TD Synnex says it has expanded its PartnerFirst platform with Microsoft and Cisco deal data, adding new connectors for Salesforce and QuickBooks Online that allow deal information to flow directly into partner CRM and accounting systems. The AI assistant is now available in Slack and Webex alongside Microsoft Teams, and a streamlined quoting tool is meant to reduce the time partners spend jumping between systems. TD Synnex also announced the updates last week. Barracuda: Barracuda says it has merged its MSP and reseller tracks into a single Partner Success Program, adding through-channel marketing automation, co-marketing resources, account mapping, customer propensity data, and a soon-to-launch Partner Locator. Channel chief Michelle Hodges noted that the company cannot dictate how customers consume technology, and that many partners now operate as hybrid MSPs and resellers. AWS: AWS is telling partners to move toward outcome-based billing models for AI services as enterprise buyers demand more value from technology investments. The cloud giant pointed to Zendesk as an example, pricing its AI tools per ticket solved rather than per seat or user, and launched its Business Value Realization program in June with $50,000 in MDF for eligible partners that demonstrate measurable outcomes. In Brief: Blumira and DNSFilter: Blumira and DNSFilter say their new two-way integration lets MSPs correlate DNS activity with Microsoft 365 logs and other telemetry sources in a single pane of glass, reducing the time needed to spot and investigate threats. OpenAI and Hugging Face: OpenAI says roughly 1,200 AI agents went rogue in July and coordinated an unprecedented attack on Hugging Face, communicating through an unsanctioned message board despite isolation controls and sharing exposed credentials to gain code execution on several servers. The company called the incident a “warning shot” for the AI community. TD SYNNEX Canada: INSPIRE 2026 is scheduled for October 28-30 at the Toronto Congress Centre, giving Canadian partners a look at upcoming vendor programs and distributor roadmaps. TCSP: The Technology Channel Sales Professionals is drafting a certification program and code of ethics for technology advisors ahead of possible FCC regulation, reflecting broader channel self-regulation efforts. CBRE: CBRE says data center vacancy rates fell to a record low 1.4% in the first half of 2026 even as construction surged 25%, driven by AI demand and power constraints in major North American markets. Read Full Transcript Welcome to The Buzz from ChannelBuzz.ca, I’m Robert Dutt, today is Wednesday, September 2, 2026, and here’s what’s happening in the channel today. TD Synnex says it has expanded its PartnerFirst platform with Microsoft and Cisco deal data, adding new connectors for Salesforce and QuickBooks Online that allow deal information to flow directly into partner CRM and accounting systems. According to the distributor, the AI assistant that was previously only in Microsoft Teams is now also available in Slack and Webex, giving partners more flexibility in how they interact with the system. A new streamlined quoting tool is meant to reduce the time partners spend jumping between systems to build proposals. TD Synnex told Channel Dive that the goal is to normalize the experience for reseller partners and take on the integration heavy lifting itself rather than forcing partners to stitch together their own workflows. The company cited Futurum Group research showing that 85% of channel partners route deals through distributor platforms. TD Synnex is also positioning itself as the fastest growing top-tier distributor, according to Omdia and Channel Dive. The expansion is significant for the Canadian market because TD SYNNEX operates a major Canadian division under president Chris Fabes, and the new connectors could reduce the administrative load for local VARs and MSPs that rely on the distributor for fulfillment and quoting. Barracuda says it has merged its MSP and reseller tracks into a single Partner Success Program. The security vendor announced the consolidation last week, adding through-channel marketing automation, co-marketing resources, account mapping, customer propensity data, and a soon-to-launch Partner Locator that will help end customers find qualified partners. In a statement, Barracuda channel chief Michelle Hodges noted that the company cannot dictate how customers consume technology, and that many partners now operate as hybrid MSPs and resellers. Historically, Barracuda had only focused on sell-through revenue for hybrid partners, leaving MSP revenue on a separate track with different support and incentives. Now, a single team is serving both routes. The restructuring reflects a broader channel trend where the line between MSP and traditional reseller is blurring as customers demand both transactional and managed services from the same provider. Canadian partners that straddle both models may find the simplified program reduces the friction of maintaining dual relationships with the vendor while giving them access to marketing and sales intelligence tools that were previously siloed by business model. AWS is telling partners to rethink their pricing models for the AI era. According to Channel Dive, the cloud giant is pushing toward outcome-based billing as enterprise buyers demand more value from AI investments and resist paying for tools that do not deliver measurable results. Allison Johnson, director of the AWS Americas Technology Partners Team, told the publication that 80% of customers are shifting to outcome-based models, according to an AWS market study. The company pointed to Zendesk as an example, pricing its AI tools per ticket solved rather than per seat or user. AWS launched its Business Value Realization program in June, offering $50,000 in market development funds to eligible partners that can demonstrate measurable customer outcomes through case studies and business value assessments. Systems integrators are being asked to move away from time-plus-materials billing toward models where they share risk and reward with the customer. For Canadian solution providers building AI practices, the shift means aligning fees with customer results rather than hours worked, a model that could change how MSPs scope and price AI projects. In Brief – Blumira and DNSFilter say their new two-way integration lets MSPs correlate DNS activity with Microsoft 365 logs and other telemetry sources in a single pane of glass. OpenAI says roughly 1,200 AI agents went rogue and coordinated an attack on Hugging Face in July, communicating through an unsanctioned message board despite isolation controls. TD SYNNEX Canada INSPIRE 2026 is scheduled for October 28-30 at the Toronto Congress Centre. The Technology Channel Sales Professionals is drafting a certification program and code of ethics for technology advisors ahead of possible FCC regulation. CBRE says data center vacancy rates fell to a record low 1.4% in the first half of 2026 even as construction surged 25%. And if you haven’t heard it yet, yesterday on In The Channel, Frank Balonis from Kiteworks explained why Canadian partners need to start CPCSC prep now and what CMMC taught us. Later today on In The Channel, Lynn Smurthwaite-Murphy from Plugable joins me to talk about bringing Amazon-tested peripherals to the IT channel and the company’s new modular AI hardware. That’s how we’re seeing the headlines today. I’m Robert Dutt for ChannelBuzz.ca, thanks for listening. Have a great day.

Frank Balonis, chief information security officer at Kiteworks The Canadian Program for Cyber Security Certification (CPCSC) officially launched Level 1 in mid-April, and for Canadian partners serving the defense supply chain, the clock is already ticking. In this episode of In The Channel, Kiteworks chief information security officer Frank Balonis joins us  to break down what the framework covers, where it differs from its U.S. counterpart, and what lessons from the CMMC rollout mean for Canadian MSPs and MSSPs. Balonis explains that while CPCSC is closely modeled on CMMC and shares the same NIST 800-171 foundation, the two frameworks diverge on one critical point: data sovereignty. Canadian defense data must remain in Canada, and partners who understand that requirement – along with the encryption and key-control implications that come with it – have a real advantage. The bigger opportunity, Balonis argues, lies in the cross-border play. Canadian partners who have already advised clients through CMMC preparation have built the muscle memory to tackle CPCSC. Those same partners can help Canadian defense suppliers meet Level 1 self-assessment requirements now, identify the “skeletons in the closet” before third-party audits arrive, and position themselves for the Level 2 requirements expected in 2027. Unlike CMMC, which paused and relaunched as 2.0, CPCSC is already live with a shorter runway. Balonis notes that CMMC has driven roughly half of Kiteworks’ deal flow over the last 18 months, and Canadian partners who start now can avoid the scramble that caught many U.S. contractors flat-footed. His core advice for partners: start with governance, not dashboards. Understanding where client data lives, how it is protected, and being able to demonstrate that control is the real work that will differentiate advisory relationships from product pitches. Read Full Transcript Robert Dutt: Hello and welcome to In The Channel from ChannelBuzz.ca, bringing news and information to the Canadian IT channel community for the last 16 years. I’m Robert Dutt, editor of ChannelBuzz.ca, and your host for the show. In mid-April, the Canadian government officially launched Level 1 of the Canadian Program for Cyber Security Certification, CPCSC, a new mandatory framework for defence contractors and their supply chain partners that’s widely seen as Canada’s answer to the U.S. CMMC program. For Canadian MSPs and MSSPs, it represents a significant and time-sensitive services opportunity, but one that comes with a shorter runway and a critical data sovereignty twist that its U.S. counterpart never had to address. To understand what the framework actually covers, how it differs from CMMC, and what lessons Canadian partners can borrow from the U.S. rollout, I sat down with Frank Balonis. He’s the chief information security officer at Kiteworks, where he’s spent years working with partners and defence contractors through CMMC preparations, and now he’s turning that experience toward the Canadian market. Let’s get right into it. My chat with Frank Balonis. Frank, thanks for taking the time. I appreciate it. Frank Balonis: Glad I could be here. Robert Dutt: Before we get into the policy stuff, let’s orient the audience a little bit. Kiteworks has been around for a long time and started under a different name, Accellion, which folks may remember. But can you kind of give me the nickel tour of where you’re at and what you do as a company today? Frank Balonis: Today, Kiteworks is positioned to protect and govern data in all channels in and out of an environment, provide governance to understand who, what, and where at all times for any data leaving your environment or coming in, to ensure sensitivity requirements and things of that nature across the board. Robert Dutt: Interesting place to be in right now because with AI and regulations around it and so many other things, governance is becoming a really big word. Frank Balonis: Yes, it is. And there’s so many aspects when you take into account AI and agents and chatbots, also possibly interacting with all that data coming in and out. It’s a bigger and bigger field out there. Robert Dutt: And tell me a little about your role. It’s kind of unusual to have a CISO as a guest voice on the show. A lot of folks tend to send channel chiefs, marketing folks, product type folks. Just given the nature of this conversation, why does it make sense to have the CISO be the person driving the conversation with partners? Frank Balonis: Well, mainly because of all the frameworks and requirements around that. And my unique position here at the company has grown throughout the years as I’ve been here for over 20 years, working through the company from the very beginning. So most of my experience is working with customers and the channel, all of our partners, and ensuring a successful deployment of the product and making sure it’s doing what it needs for them and their own end users. Robert Dutt: Okay. Let’s set the table for the audience in terms of the Canadian Program for Cyber Security Certification, CPCSC, which I am going to botch so many times trying to say that out loud, but I’ll just get that out of the way upfront. Officially launched Level 1 in mid-April. It’s an ongoing process. For a partner who hasn’t been following this space closely, can you give us kind of the rough definition on what exactly it’s covering and why does it matter right now? Frank Balonis: Well, what it’s covering is – actually the bigger thing to know is it’s very much a partner framework that’s based on the U.S. CMMC platform, which revolves around government defence contractors in protecting the sensitive data and working with the defence and the government, both in Canada and the U.S. It’s actually based on the same framework as CMMC. So it’s really important to know because they’ve been seeing from up north what the U.S. has been going through for the last 18 months, and hopefully they’ll be able to take some lessons learned from that entire process. Robert Dutt: I understand there are some technical differences between the two, including the fact that Canada is using a slightly newer version of the underlying NIST standards. How close is the Canadian standard that’s rolling out to the U.S.-based CMMC that is in fact in play right now, and where does that comparison kind of break down? Frank Balonis: The biggest and first breakdown of that is it compares quite a bit, actually. It’s very – like you said, it’s just a newer version of the original that it’s based on. So it’s extremely similar. The one divergent part is the data sovereignty for Canada that is put in place. The CMMC in the U.S. is more about protecting the data. It doesn’t matter where it’s at rest, as long as it’s properly protected and governed by the controls put in place. Whereas the Canadian – and I have an issue as well with the CPCSC framework – there’s data sovereignty, which means it must remain in Canadian land and maintain that sovereignty. Robert Dutt: Who are we talking about when we say folks who are involved as Canadian defence suppliers here? The first thing that pops to mind are the big defence companies, the Lockheed Martins of the world, but there’s also a pretty big SMB world here. I guess I want to get into what does the actual supply chain look like and how that’s relevant to the MSP and MSSP community that’s listening to us. Frank Balonis: Yeah, so it applies to everyone who is doing business and processing sensitive data between their own organization and the government defence agency. So it can be the big, large – the Boeings of the world, the General Dynamics – but it is also the small SMB, even a five-person company that is doing some special design work for software, hardware, whatever it might be. They’re all tied into the same framework. Now, there’s going to be various levels. As you mentioned, Level 1 is in play right now. Level 2 will be later and so on until Level 3, very much similar to CMMC. So it varies depending on what type of data and what industry they’re in, but it affects all of them. Robert Dutt: How do those levels ramp over time? What’s the dividing line between Level 1, Level 2, Level 3? Frank Balonis: Well, Level 1 starts out with a self-assessment where an organization will have to look at the framework, the controls, and self-assess and attest to meeting those requirements. As you move into Level 2, you will have to have a third party – a C3PAO – to perform these audits. And when Level 3 comes out as it’s finalized, it is only the defence organization that can do those audits. And that’s still, as you mentioned, in progress. Robert Dutt: Okay. So it’s sort of a measure of who keeps track of it and how rigorous that attestation is. Got it. You rightly point out the really big wrinkle on the Canadian side of things: data sovereignty. It means you can’t just take Protected B data in Canada and put it on a U.S.-hosted cloud environment, make sure everything’s as locked down as it needs to be, and call it done. How big a deal is that in practice compared to what you saw with CMMC in the States? And what does it mean for partners to have to include that in their calculus and their thinking? Frank Balonis: Well, the good news is that from what I’ve seen in all the customers and partners we’ve been working with, although it’s not a hard requirement with CMMC, most of them are trying to – it makes it easier to answer that question if you know that it’s where it’s at in the U.S. and safe. So the bigger issue in Canada would be more reliant on: there are cloud services, colocation facilities, things of that nature. You can also do a hybrid as long as the data remains in Canada within your own area or within a hosted facility. Of course, there are also concerns of the CLOUD Act and issues in that manner. And that’s why you would need to ensure that you are specifically – these can be addressed with other technologies such as encryption at rest and things of that nature that would protect you from having to worry about that. Robert Dutt: That’s kind of a generally overhanging concern though. It’s not necessarily specific to this particular regulation. It’s an industry-wide thing if I’m not mistaken. Frank Balonis: 100%. I deal with this globally all the time and we work together to provide the right tooling and controls to ensure that you can meet the data sovereignty and you do not have to be concerned about the CLOUD Act. Robert Dutt: That must be a super fun challenge given the array of countries that have various regulations that are going in various directions at various times and the propensity of those to change. Frank Balonis: Yes. That’s why the important part that we always work with our customers and partners on is understanding that – making sure that the customer, the end user itself, that organization has full control of their data by controlling the keys, maintaining awareness and control of where the data is, how it’s stored. It allows them to address any framework or global requirements. Robert Dutt: So let’s take away some of the lessons if we can from CMMC and that experience. You guys have been living with CMMC since the early days of the rollout, working with defence contractors, partners through the whole experience. Looking back, what actually happened in the U.S. market when it landed and became law of the land? Did the partner community step up and help solve the problem? Was it chaos? What did we experience? Frank Balonis: Actually, a little bit of all of the above really. There was a lot of chaos. There’s still a lot of chaos, honestly. As you understand the scope and the breadth of all of the companies that are going to be in focus for both of these frameworks, there’s still a lot to be learned. But there are a number of partners and MSPs that have understood really where to lock in on what these requirements are. At the end of the day, in the U.S., for instance, the CMMC was actually just another enforcement of something that was already required of the contractors with the NIST SP 800-171. They were already required to meet those. CMMC was just a more rigid framework that has to be completed, whether it’s your own self-attestation or third party. So there’s the aspect of that. Once you understand these requirements have already existed and that the main point of this is governance and evidence to prove that you are following these controls – where the organizations focused on that, as opposed to just trying to cover everything, they succeeded in making this a successful program for a number of our customers. And I’ve seen it in how they work with other companies and vendors to do the same thing. So focusing on the governance part is where it needs to happen. Robert Dutt: Any other common threads that you saw among partners who built successful practices around CMMC, or around customers who are subject to CMMC? What did those partners do differently – technical services, different service models, a go-to-market thing, a combination of any of that? Frank Balonis: There was a lot of go-to-market. We see not only with just us as a vendor, but other partner vendors that we have working with our partners to build an entire framework to help meet the needs of CMMC. Technologies like Kiteworks and other security platforms, they can meet a majority of the controls, but there are some areas that it doesn’t make sense or it just doesn’t fit, that they can meet all the controls. So bringing all of those together and understanding the controls and staying focused on those was what drove the success that we’ve seen in putting together an entire ecosystem to properly provide the evidence and the governance over the platform and your environment. Robert Dutt: Okay. Your own data for the CMMC experience shows some pretty sobering numbers – less than half of contractors feel prepared for Level 2 and more than half still haven‘t done a gap analysis. I’m curious if you think Canada is tracking along a similar way. Are there any signs that we’re better prepared because folks have been able to sit back and watch the experience in the U.S. and kind of seeing where the mines are in the minefield? Frank Balonis: Yes, I think they’re going to be in a better place as long as you learn from history and are able to move forward. As we see in the close proximity of the two countries, the fact that those two frameworks were actually purposely built off the same framework for that commonality – I’m already working with partners and customers from Canada that need to meet the CMMC requirements. So those organizations already have a leg up because they already have all of these things in place. Now they may have to make adjustments because of the sovereignty rule that we talked about earlier, but it allows them to quickly address these needs. So as long as they’ve been paying attention to the neighbours down south and enacting these things, they’ll have a leg up on where the U.S. was a few years ago with CMMC. The downside is they have a shorter runway to do it because CMMC launched and then they paused and then they launched again with CMMC 2.0 and they built through all of that. Whereas CPCSC is already live and continuing to move forward, and you have to meet requirements as soon as this summer and sooner than later you’re going to have Level 2 requirement and a Level 3 requirement, depending of course where you are and what data you’re working with. So it’s something one has to be on top of fairly quickly if one is affected or working with organizations that are. Robert Dutt: Absolutely. And a lot of the partners – one of us actually earlier working with a partner that is out of Canada to provide services for CMMC – we have these partners that understand exactly how you need to move forward in addressing these things. So as long as the partners have a very good future of being able to help their customers, as long as they’ve been paying attention, they’ll be able to help these organizations that don’t have a compliance person, they’re too small of an organization, they don’t have all of these things in place, and they are going to have to rely on these partners to help them out. I wanted to expand a little bit on what you were talking about with the kind of cross-border opportunity. You flagged it with partners who are in Canada, who today have some experience working with CMMC, they’ve built up some of the muscle memory to deal with CPCSC as it comes online. I imagine somewhere down the road in the not too distant future, by the sounds of it, we’re going to have Canadian partners who are CPCSC certified, who are therefore partially down the road to understanding and being able to solve for CMMC. How much of that – how real is that cross-border bidding opportunity and how should a partner be thinking about positioning that? Frank Balonis: I think there’s a real opportunity there because the partners up north might not have been able to be the third-party auditors for CMMC, but they could be the advisors. As long as they’re working through all of that, they could take their experience from being advisors to their customers to prepare for CMMC and convert that into the ability to actually work with auditors for the CPCSC and help implement that. Where, again, a number of our customers utilize this – since there isn’t that sovereignty requirement with CMMC and there is that natural instinct of an organization that wants to stay completely in control, they already have their data up in Canada, which means they’ve already got a framework in place to meet the CMMC requirements for the U.S. and they can easily convert that to CPCSC very, very easily. So the best advice I could give to an organization is to properly vet and find a partner that has that experience and can quickly work with you to get you up to speed because, as we mentioned, they have a much shorter runway to get there. They can’t start at the beginning. They have to find someone that’s already been doing this for a while. Robert Dutt: If I’m a Canadian MSSP or a security-focused VAR listening to this right now, I’ve got a general security practice. Maybe I’ve been doing some compliance work in regulated industries. Where do I actually start with this? What’s the first conversation I should be having with my clients and what does engagement around CPCSC or CMMC look like in practice? Frank Balonis: It really starts with understanding whether they know where their data is and how that data is being protected. That is the biggest part of all of that. Working with the partner to understand what these requirements look like, where their data is, is the first place that I would really focus on because, again, the most important part is not a dashboard but the governance and the evidence of it and making sure that you control this. Robert Dutt: What’s kind of the best practice guideline, shall we say, for timelines? I imagine because of the nature of this, it’s not the kind of thing you want to be looking at that deadline and planning to slide in right at the deadline to reach compliance. You want to have some runway to make sure that all of your assumptions along the way have been correct, shall we say? Frank Balonis: If I was an organization up in Canada right now, I’d already be looking for a partner to help. Maybe not specifically setting any kind of deadlines other than the fact that you understand certain requirements are going to be in effect this summer. So the sooner you get on this, the faster, the better. So yesterday is the time to start on this, but if you can’t start yesterday, start today. That’s the best advice I could give because there’s always going to be those skeletons in the closet of, “Oh, I forgot about this,” or “Where is that?” As you start walking through the framework with your partners and understanding the controls, you are going to uncover things that you need to address as quickly as possible. Very similar to CMMC, you will have very little room to have any kind of out-of-control controls, so to speak, any findings or nonconformities depending on what framework you’re looking at and what type of audit. The area for margin is very small. Robert Dutt: Along that note, the last one for me: Level 1 is self-assessment, which is relatively accessible, I would think. But Level 2, you’re getting third-party assessments and that clock is ticking toward April 2027. Sort of along the same lines as the last question, but what’s basically your message to the Canadian partner community about the window of opportunity that exists right now? Frank Balonis: I would, for the folks that are going to be required for Level 2, I would do the Level 1 as soon as possible for you to understand where your gaps are. And you can attest to have your controls in place, because when Level 2 comes, the more information you already have by running through your own internal audit, which is effectively what a Level 1 is, the quicker you’ll be able to close those gaps and understand what you need to do before 2027 comes up on you. I personally, we’re working on consolidating a huge number of audits into a single one, and I’m already nervous that we’re three months away and still looking at a few things to complete all of them. We’ve done all of these individually, but we’re bringing them together, and that’s where you start seeing your gaps in between different organizations, different architectures. So the sooner you understand where you are, the sooner you can close those gaps and meet the requirements for Level 2. Robert Dutt: Sound advice. I appreciate it. Thanks for taking the time to walk us through the situation as it is and the opportunity out there for partners. Frank Balonis: My pleasure. I’m glad I could do this today. Robert Dutt: There you have it. Frank Balonis from Kiteworks. I’d like to thank Frank for his time. A couple of things from that conversation that I think are worth sitting with. First, the urgency. Balonis was clear that unlike CMMC, which paused, restarted, and gave the market time to catch its breath, CPCSC is already live and moving toward Level 2 third-party assessments. If you are a Canadian partner waiting for the phone to ring, you are already behind the partners who started this work six months ago. Second, the governance point. The line that stuck with me was that the important part is not a dashboard, but the governance and the evidence of it. In a market that loves to sell tools, the real compliance opportunity is advisory: helping clients understand where their data lives, how it is protected, and being able to demonstrate that control. That is a services play, not a product play. And third, the cross-border angle. Canadian partners who built CMMC advisory muscle with U.S. clients have a head start that is actually hard to replicate. The frameworks share the same foundation, and the sovereignty requirement is a wrinkle, not a wall. The firms that can bridge both sides of the border are going to be the ones that win the long-term compliance relationships. I’d like to thank you as always for listening to the show. Follow or subscribe wherever you get your podcasts – Apple Podcasts, Spotify, YouTube, most directories. Ratings and reviews are always appreciated and always help. Until next time, I’m Robert Dutt for ChannelBuzz.ca, and I’ll see you in the channel.

Today’s headline news for Canadian IT solution providers: KnowBe4 names Kurt Mills channel chief: KnowBe4 has appointed Kurt Mills as channel chief, according to an announcement scheduled for release this morning. The company says Mills will lead the evolution of its global partner programs, operations, and channel routes to market. Mills brings more than 25 years of cybersecurity channel experience from roles at Trellix, Check Point Software Technologies, Mimecast, FireMon, and Blue Coat Systems. In a statement, KnowBe4 CEO Bryan Palma said partner ecosystem growth is central to the company’s mission and that Mills’ deep channel expertise will be instrumental as KnowBe4 expands its market reach. CBTS launches Forge Agents: CBTS, the $1.3 billion technology services company, is launching Forge Agents today. The platform is designed to move mid-market and regulated organizations from AI pilots to custom agents running securely in production within days. CBTS says the platform includes 187 prebuilt artifacts and 34 cross-industry blueprints, with support for Anthropic, Google, AWS, Cisco, and on-premises environments. The company developed the platform using lessons from deploying AI internally across more than 2,300 employees and reports achieving full return on investment within three months. Sublime Security integrates with CrowdStrike Falcon Next-Gen SIEM: Sublime Security announced at Fal.Con 2026a new integration with CrowdStrike Falcon Next-Gen SIEM. The integration brings email security signals into the SIEM so analysts can correlate email-based threats with endpoint, identity, cloud, and threat intelligence data in one unified workflow. According to Sublime Security, AI-generated attack content is up roughly five times in the past year, and 90 percent of malicious emails are now customized to their target. The integration lets analysts trigger remediation and deploy organization-specific detection coverage directly from a Falcon investigation. DefensX expands browser security for MSPs: DefensX has expanded its secure web browser suite with new AI governance capabilities designed to help MSPs govern AI usage and protect customer data at the browser layer, according to eChannelNEWS. Mondoo launches endpoint inventory and governance tools: Mondoo has launched inventory and governance tools for endpoint security, giving security teams visibility and control over shadow AI tooling on company endpoints, as reported by eChannelNEWS. Canada imposes counter-tariffs on U.S. tech goods: Canada will impose 15 percent counter-tariffs on U.S.-origin electronics including smartphones, gaming consoles, and appliances effective September 8, though major enterprise IT infrastructure is largely exempt, according to the Department of Finance Canada. Prophet Security finds 46% of internal AI SOC builds deprecated: Prophet Security’s 2026 State of AI in Security Operations report found that 46 percent of organizations’ internal AI SOC builds were ultimately deprecated, replaced with commercial technology, or never reached production, suggesting a significant channel opportunity for MSSPs and integrators. Prophet Security Commvault and CrowdStrike extend AI automation: Commvault and CrowdStrike have extended their integration to automate cyber recovery actions within CrowdStrike’s Charlotte agentic SOAR workflows, available now to joint customers. PRNewswire Read Full Transcript Welcome to The Buzz from ChannelBuzz.ca, I’m Robert Dutt, today is Tuesday, September 1, 2026, and here’s what’s happening in the channel today. KnowBe4 has appointed Kurt Mills as channel chief, according to an announcement scheduled for release this morning. The company says Mills will lead the evolution of its global partner programs, operations, and channel routes to market. Mills brings more than 25 years of cybersecurity channel experience from roles at Trellix, Check Point Software Technologies, Mimecast, FireMon, and Blue Coat Systems. In a statement, KnowBe4 CEO Bryan Palma said partner ecosystem growth is central to the company’s mission and that Mills’ deep channel expertise and track record of building high-performing teams through IPOs, acquisitions, and rapid market expansion will be instrumental as KnowBe4 expands its market reach. The appointment builds on a series of recent channel leadership additions, including Neill Burton and John Noha as vice presidents of channel supporting global initiatives. Canadian MSPs building managed security services around human risk management may see expanded program resources and enablement as KnowBe4 deepens its channel investment in a market where security awareness is becoming a recurring revenue staple. CBTS, the $1.3 billion technology services company, is launching Forge Agents today. The platform is designed to move mid-market and regulated organizations from AI pilots to custom agents running securely in production within days. Users describe the work they want completed in plain language, and CBTS says it builds the agent using the models and infrastructure the organization already has in place. The platform includes 187 prebuilt artifacts and 34 cross-industry blueprints, with support for Anthropic, Google, AWS, Cisco, and on-premises environments. CBTS developed the platform using lessons from deploying AI internally across more than 2,300 employees, and the company reports achieving full return on investment within three months. Mid-market Canadian clients are struggling to move AI from pilot to production, and CBTS’s template-driven approach gives channel partners a services wrapper they can build around. Sublime Security announced yesterday at Fal.Con 2026 in Las Vegas a new integration with CrowdStrike Falcon Next-Gen SIEM. The integration brings email security signals into the SIEM so analysts can correlate email-based threats with endpoint, identity, cloud, and threat intelligence data in one unified workflow. According to Sublime, AI-generated attack content is up roughly five times in the past year, and 90 percent of malicious emails are now customized to their target, making static detection increasingly inadequate. The integration lets analysts trigger remediation and deploy organization-specific detection coverage directly from a Falcon investigation, rather than waiting for the next vendor update cycle. Sublime says the integration gives analysts full, editable visibility into detection logic with no black box or vendor ticket required. The tighter correlation between email and endpoint detection should help Canadian MSPs compress response time from days to hours for clients without in-house security operations centers. In Brief – DefensX has expanded its secure web browser suite with new AI governance capabilities designed to help MSPs govern AI usage and protect customer data at the browser layer. Mondoo has launched inventory and governance tools for endpoint security, giving security teams visibility and control over shadow AI tooling on company endpoints. Canada will impose 15 percent counter-tariffs on U.S.-origin electronics including smartphones, gaming consoles, and appliances effective September 8, though major IT infrastructure is largely exempt. Prophet Security’s 2026 State of AI in Security Operations report found that 46 percent of organizations’ internal AI SOC builds were ultimately deprecated, replaced, or never reached production. Commvault and CrowdStrike have extended their integration to automate cyber recovery actions within CrowdStrike’s Charlotte agentic SOAR workflows, available now to joint customers. Full details and links in the show notes or the blog post. Later today on In The Channel, Frank Balonis from Kiteworks joins me to break down what Canadian partners need to know about the Canadian Program for Cyber Security Certification, and why the window to get ahead of Level 2 requirements is already closing. And if you haven’t heard it yet, my conversation with Jason Wieser from Calero on why technology expense management might be the MSP practice you’ve been overlooking. That’s how we’re seeing the headlines today. I’m Robert Dutt for ChannelBuzz.ca, thanks for listening. Have a great day.

Jason Wieser, senior vice president of mid-market and channel sales at Calero If technology expense management isn’t on your radar as a practice area, Jason Wieser thinks that’s about to change. Wieser, senior vice president of mid-market and channel sales at Calero and a 2026 CRN Channel Chief, joins In The Channel to talk about why MSPs and VARs are leaving real recurring revenue on the table by not offering technology spend management services to their customers. The conversation covers a lot of practical ground. Wieser explains why SaaS visibility has become the entry point for most partner conversations – delivering value in hours rather than the months that traditional telecom expense management historically required. He walks through how successful partners use TEM as a pipeline creation tool, turning full visibility into a customer’s contract and renewal landscape into a 3-4 year forward roadmap. And he offers a simple three-question framework – visibility, control, or optimization – that partners can use to qualify where a customer actually needs help. Wieser also touches on the recently launched Calero ConnectIQ, an orchestration layer designed to automate the flow of intelligence across technology expense data, and on the shadow SaaS problem – Gartner estimates the average enterprise runs 145 applications, and Calero’s data suggests the real number is significantly higher. For partners curious about what getting started actually looks like, Calero’s partner program has no joining fees or revenue commitments at entry level. Read Full Transcript Robert Dutt: Hello and welcome to In The Channel from ChannelBuzz.ca, bringing news and information to the Canadian IT channel community for the last sixteen years. I’m Robert Dutt, editor of ChannelBuzz.ca and your host for the show. When we talk about practice areas for MSPs and VARs, we usually start with the big ones: cybersecurity, cloud migration, and managed infrastructure. One area that rarely makes the list, but probably should, is technology expense management, or TEM. It is an area that has historically been seen as a back-office auditing function. But in an era of massive SaaS sprawl and complex mobility footprints, it is becoming an advisory service for the new C-suite. My guest today is Jason Wieser, senior vice president of mid-market and channel sales at Calero. Jason was named a 2026 CRN Channel Chief, and he has spent the last few years building a partner program around the idea that TEM is actually a pipeline-creation engine for the channel. Let’s get right into it – my chat with Jason Wieser. Robert Dutt: Jason, thanks for taking the time. I appreciate it. Jason Wieser: Thank you for having me. I really appreciate it. Robert Dutt: You’ve been in tech sales for about twenty years. I’m curious: how did you land in technology expense management, and what made you want to stay and build a channel around it? Jason Wieser: I’ll be honest: when the TEM opportunity was first presented to me, I ran for the hills. I wasn’t willing to entertain the conversation. I’m sure my reasons were similar to those of many people when they think about TEM – that it is a legacy product set and not really on the cutting edge of technology. But from my perspective, as I heard the pitch, particularly around the SaaS expense management component, that was what got me excited. I felt there was a tremendous amount of opportunity. It was a wildly untapped market, and coming out of the COVID environment, I thought there was a good opportunity for channel partners to capitalize on the SaaS sprawl that we all experienced. That is what brought me into the TEM side of the business. When we were building out the channel, there weren’t many players in the TEM space with a channel focus. During the discussions we had as we were courting each other, one thing that came up was that Calero had no desire to be an agent. That was a big differentiator for me, and it was pivotal to my willingness to jump in and build out a channel, because none of the other TEM players could say that. It was a significant differentiator when you think about the value delivered back to the channel. When you combine those two things – the SaaS opportunity and Calero’s channel-first approach – it became a great opportunity. I’m really happy with the success we’ve had over the last four years building the channel at Calero. Robert Dutt: Most of my listeners are IT resellers and MSPs who probably haven’t thought much about TEM as a line of business they would offer. But you describe it as an untapped opportunity – words that always make my ears perk up. Can you make the case for that partner? Why should this be on their radar right now? Jason Wieser: I think the difference is in where TEM was and where it has gone. Historically, TEM stood for telecom expense management. Now, we think of it as technology expense management. I see this as a pipeline-creation tool for MSPs and resellers. Partners that lean in and work with a TEM provider that supports the channel can build a three-year pipeline roadmap. A reseller might ask, “How is that the case?” The way we go to market is that when we work with partners – whether they are resellers, referral partners, or MSPs – we make them part of the solution. They get full access to the Calero platform with their respective customer. That creates a building block. They can identify which contracts are coming up and position themselves as a trusted advisor to their customer. For example, if the customer’s Zoom licenses are coming up for renewal, the partner can see the usage rate. Or perhaps the customer’s Microsoft enterprise agreement is coming up for renewal. The partner can look at how the organization is using its E5 licenses and determine whether it really needs E5, or whether some users should be moved to E3 or F3 licenses. The partner gets to change the trajectory of the conversation and add a new source of value to the organization. At the end of the day, I see that as the biggest opportunity for a partner organization. From there, the partner can build on that process. They can look at circuits that are coming up for renewal, mobility, and other technology expenses. All of that helps them build out a pipeline over the next three, four, or five years. Robert Dutt: Is this something that a smaller reseller or MSP can realistically build, or does it require a certain level of scale to be a real opportunity? Jason Wieser: The good news is that we built this for MSPs and resellers. Historically, with technology expense management – or telecom expense management – you needed to have a large customer base. You might need a customer with a million dollars in annual telecom spend, otherwise it did not make sense. Now that we’ve moved into SaaS, particularly with a mid-market focus, you can go much further down-market. Our smallest customer has 250 employees. That gives a partner the opportunity to change the conversation and use this in a much smaller-capacity environment. On the telecom side, it used to take four, five, or six months to build out the infrastructure and gather all the data. On the SaaS side, it takes four, five, or six hours to bring information in. That is a significant differentiator. Partners can scale the opportunity, realize savings much more quickly, and begin addressing the control and optimization issues associated with technology spending. Robert Dutt: Legacy TEM is rooted in telecom, but given the speed at which you can prove value with SaaS, what is typically the entry point into the conversation with a customer? Does the conversation still begin with telecom bills that have gotten out of control? Do partners lead with SaaS sprawl? Is it mobile device management? What typically opens the door? Jason Wieser: From an MSP standpoint, what we are seeing work right now is starting with SaaS. It is the gateway because you have the opportunity to show immediate results. On the telecom and mobility sides, it is a longer process. You need letters of authorization, or LOAs. You need access to the data, and you need to bring all of that information into the system. That process can take four, five, or six months if the LOAs are not completed in a timely manner. With SaaS, you can get access to an endpoint and conduct a proof of value immediately with the partner. You can start showcasing the data sets, and the decision practically writes itself for the customer. For an MSP, I would focus on SaaS because of that speed. The ability to white-label the platform and make it look like your own – with your logo in the upper-left corner and “powered by Calero” underneath – helps cement you as a true partner to the business. Robert Dutt: The thesis seems to be about the merger of telecom, mobility, and SaaS into one management problem. But for many businesses, those are still three different budget lines, with three different people responsible for them. What makes managing them together increasingly important, and who on the customer side is feeling the pain most or leading the charge? Jason Wieser: That’s the million-dollar question, because they are very different business units. We view our platform as providing a single pane of glass to accommodate all of those expense categories. But the person making SaaS decisions is usually not the same person making mobility decisions, and neither is necessarily the person responsible for telecom. The way we frame it is to start on the SaaS side. We leverage the resources and data sets that we are able to uncover with the partner, and then we ask to go wider into the organization. SaaS provides the gateway. Once we have shown results – whether that is savings, improved security, better control, or the ability to bring in data that the customer did not previously have – we can ask who owns mobility and who owns telecom. We may also uncover an optimization opportunity while reviewing an enterprise agreement, or while a customer is considering a move from Zoom to RingCentral. The partner has proof points showing business value, and that makes the conversation much easier. The customer is more willing to provide an introduction to the people responsible for those other areas. If you approach this holistically, it is generally more of a CFO- or CTO-level discussion because it is tied to a broader business-transformation objective. But that usually has to come from the top down. If you are trying to create an all-encompassing program from the bottom up, we do not see that very frequently. It is much more common to get a foot in the door and then expand from there. Robert Dutt: What does the economics look like for a partner that builds this practice well? Are we talking about meaningful recurring revenue, or is this more of a retention and stickiness play? Jason Wieser: I would say it is both. When you look at the dollar size of the opportunity, there is definitely a compensation component that can be worthwhile, depending on the time of year and the programs available. From an MSP perspective, there is also a traditional markup that the partner can earn. Our plans and packages are designed to support those upsides for MSPs. From a stickiness standpoint, that is also a key element. We are only four years old in the channel, so we do not yet have the channel data to say precisely how sticky it is. But if you look at our customer base overall, it is a very sticky product. Our average customer has been with Calero for seven and a half years. That creates an opportunity for growth within the partner community. The partner can continue demonstrating value and having those conversations over time. Robert Dutt: You talk about partners moving from transactional selling to advisory relationships, particularly around practice-building. That is the right direction, but it is a real cultural shift for a lot of partner organizations. Where do you see partners getting stuck, and what separates the ones that make the transition from the ones that do not? Jason Wieser: We see partners getting stuck when they are not completely certain how to have the conversation. I would describe that primarily as an enablement issue, combined with a willingness to lean in. Telecom was never a particularly exciting topic. Most partners have not leaned into it over the last fifteen years unless they specifically built a telecom expense management practice. There are very few of those partners. Having the understanding required to conduct those baseline conversations takes some work at the outset. The partners we have seen succeed are the ones that have leaned in. They understand how to have those initial discussions and then tie them back to what matters to the business. There are three things we look at that drive success: Are you looking for visibility? Are you looking for control? Are you looking for optimization? It could be all three. The partners that can tie the proof point back to one or more of those outcomes, and have those conversations on the fly, are the ones that move beyond dipping their toes in the water and begin to see meaningful growth within their practice. I do not want to make it sound as if they need to build a large team. One of our largest partners is a billion-dollar organization, but it has ten practices run by one person. One person has leaned into the conversation, and that person is brought in when the opportunities arise. Robert Dutt: You launched Calero ConnectIQ just a couple of weeks ago. Can you give me the quick version of what that changes for partners and their customers? The bigger question is this: as more of the heavy lifting gets automated, does that make the practice easier to build, or does it simply raise customer expectations? Jason Wieser: The ConnectIQ launch is important because it allows us to streamline our connections to the external world. It gives us API hooks in a much quicker manner and allows us to access data in a more streamlined way. From the perspective of a partner recognizing and delivering value to its customers, that is a significant benefit. As for the AI component and what those dynamics will look like, that is still to be determined. We are only two to four weeks into the launch. We have use cases that we have developed to date, but the real-world application is still being fleshed out. We will continue working with the partner community to drive those successes across the global channel. Robert Dutt: I’m guessing that having those hooks, or making it easier to establish those hooks, is especially important as SaaS comes to the forefront. Telecom is a relatively small community in terms of the number of providers, while SaaS is not. Jason Wieser: The number of SaaS applications in enterprise organizations is absolutely staggering. Gartner has cited an average of 145 applications in an enterprise. We find the actual number to be significantly higher because of shadow SaaS. I’ll use myself as an example. I have applications that the business does not provide – applications that I pay for myself – and those applications are still accessing data. I probably should not say that on this podcast because now I am going to be audited by the business. Robert Dutt: I think you mean, hypothetically, that you could possibly have applications that are not approved by corporate. Jason Wieser: Absolutely. Good clarification. It just goes to show that you cannot control what you do not have visibility into. The number of applications touching the network is growing and continues to grow because there are so many specialized applications. A new person comes into an organization and prefers ChatGPT over Claude, or vice versa. They are going to use the tools they are familiar with. ConnectIQ is there to assist with that and provide the ability to get that data in a much more streamlined manner. Robert Dutt: I want to bring this home for my audience specifically – the Canadian IT reseller and MSP. Can you tell me a bit about where Calero is in Canada? Are you active with Canadian partners? Is there anything specific about the Canadian market, including the structure of the telecom industry or the profile of the businesses that need this, that makes this a particular moment of opportunity here? Jason Wieser: One thing we have done well as a company, particularly with our customer base, is operate as a global organization. That also presents unique challenges. If I think about Canada specifically, there are businesses for which data cannot leave Canadian borders. Our ability to put that infrastructure in place and ensure that data remains on the Canadian side of the fence is important. We also need to ensure that our partners have the ability to facilitate that for customers. This remains a focal point for us, and it is something we need to continue investing in as we build our Canadian partnerships and drive growth. Robert Dutt: Last one for me. Canadian solution providers are listening to this and thinking, “This could be an opportunity. This might be something I need to look at more seriously.” What are the best first steps? What should they do next as they think about how this fits into their business and potentially build a practice? Jason Wieser: We would love to have a baseline conversation. We are happy to learn more about their business and then reference similar businesses and partners where we have seen success. We can highlight what those partners have done and how the model has worked for them. We also have an enablement track that we run with partners to help them become comfortable with the opportunity. If a partner wants to lean in, we are more than happy to provide the resources to help build the practice. That way, the partner can begin generating sales from the technology expense management side while also building a strong pipeline over the next two, three, or four years. Robert Dutt: Brilliant. That’s something they can certainly act on. It is an interesting opportunity – one that I had not thought of in quite this way, as the conversation has shifted from a telecom-centric discussion to a broader technology expense management discussion. I appreciate you bringing some of this to light. Thank you very much. Jason Wieser: Thank you for your time. Robert Dutt: There you have it, Jason Wieser from Calero. I’d like to thank Jason for his time today. I think the big takeaway for me was the idea that SaaS is the front door. We often think of expense management as a months-long slog through old telecom invoices. But Jason’s point is that a partner can deliver visibility into a customer’s SaaS sprawl in a matter of hours and then use that insight to build a three- to five-year roadmap. That is a real shift in how to think about the opportunity. If you are looking for a way to move from transactional selling to the trusted-advisor status that we are always talking about, this seems like a practical path to get there. I’d also like to thank you for tuning in. If you are enjoying the show, please make sure to follow or subscribe to the podcast on Apple Podcasts, Spotify, YouTube, or wherever you usually get your podcasts. Ratings and reviews are always encouraged. Until next time, I’m Robert Dutt for ChannelBuzz.ca, and I’ll see you in the channel.

Kevin Kennedy, vice president of global partner ecosystem at Red Hat The channel has fundamentally changed – and for a long time, Red Hat‘s partner program hadn’t caught up. That’s the candid starting point for Kevin Kennedy, who joins In The Channel this week fresh off his appointment as Red Hat’s vice president of global partner ecosystem. Kennedy’s career spans just about every layer of the channel – direct sales at IBM and Xerox, close to a decade at Arrow Electronics, and leadership roles at VCE, Dell EMC, and TD SYNNEX before joining Red Hat in 2022. That perspective shapes how he talks about the shift from a model built on clear “swim lanes” – where resellers, services partners, and software sellers all stayed in their own lanes – to the multi-partner, collaborative engagements that define how business gets done today. “It’s really hard to even define a partner today,” Kennedy says. “We can’t go to market by ourselves any longer.” Red Hat’s program refresh responds to that reality with a bifurcated incentive structure: front-end rewards for individual sellers at the deal level, and back-end incentives for firms making deeper investments in Red Hat competencies. Kennedy is direct about what drove the change: “We were putting all of our rewards around the resell of our products. And that ship had sailed.” The conversation also covers the Broadcom/VMware disruption as a modernization opportunity rather than a rip-and-replace play, where AI realistically fits in the partner revenue picture right now, the evolving role of distribution as an ecosystem aggregator, and – for Canadian partners specifically – the growing urgency of data sovereignty as a go-to-market factor. And Kennedy offers a memorable frame for Red Hat’s long-term platform ambition: “Red Hat inside” – the idea that Red Hat increasingly underpins solutions partners build and customers buy, whether or not the name is on the box. Read Full Transcript Robert Dutt: Hello and welcome to In The Channel from ChannelBuzz.ca, bringing news and information to the Canadian IT channel community for the last 16 years. I’m Robert Dutt, editor of ChannelBuzz.ca and your host for the show. My guest today is Kevin Kennedy, vice president of the global partner ecosystem at Red Hat. Kevin’s career spans just about every seat in the channel: direct sales at IBM and Xerox; the better part of a decade, on and off, at Arrow Electronics; leadership roles at VCE and Dell EMC; and then about five years running advanced solutions at Tech Data and TD SYNNEX before coming to Red Hat in 2022. That’s a resume that takes you from carrying a bag, through distribution leadership, to vendor-side ecosystem strategy. That full-channel perspective shapes how he thinks about the partner business in ways that are pretty evident in this conversation. Red Hat recently named him the permanent head of its global partner ecosystem, and the word “ecosystem” in that title is deliberate, as you’ll hear. We get into how the partner business has fundamentally shifted from the old swim-lane model to something much more collaborative and complex; what Red Hat is changing in its partner program and why; the VMware modernization opportunity; where AI realistically fits in the partner revenue story right now; and what data sovereignty means for Canadian partners specifically. Let’s get right into it, my chat with Kevin Kennedy. Robert Dutt: Kevin, thanks for taking the time. I appreciate it. Kevin Kennedy: Thanks for having me, Rob. I appreciate being here. Robert Dutt: You’ve been in so many different seats facing the channel, from starting in direct sales at IBM and Xerox, to distribution, and now, of course, the vendor side. I’m curious: when you look back at the arc of the channel, as it were, over that time, what’s the biggest way the partner business has changed since you started looking at it and watching it closely? Kevin Kennedy: That’s a great question, because there has been a significant evolution, that’s for sure. I think it starts with the definition of what a partner is. It used to be that you had very clear swim lanes. You had resellers, you had services partners, and you had people who always sold software or people who always sold hardware. Everybody had their individual lanes, and that was predominantly the way the channel made money: through the resale of all those things. If you fast-forward to today, it’s completely different. It’s really hard to even define a partner today. You can’t put them in one camp. Take a larger partner like WWT, for example. It used to be the preeminent reseller for a myriad of OEM lines. Today, that may be just a portion of its business. If you look at its total bottom-line profitability, I would say the vast majority of that comes from the services it offers and the contracts it manages for very large customers. Partners have evolved. We used to be able to go sell something individually. With the complexity that now exists in technology and the solutions that customers are demanding, we can’t go to market by ourselves any longer. We’re forced to collaborate and build relationships outside of our historical domains in order to present a customer with a holistic solution that’s going to drive the outcomes or efficiencies they demand. I think all of that dynamic is great. We talked about multi-partner engagement for decades and couldn’t get it to work because, realistically, we were all competing for the same nickel. If I went into a customer with you, likely one of us would get cut out of that deal or eventually be eased out. Today, that’s not true. We’re really dependent on each other. You bring your strengths to the table, I bring mine to the table, and those combined strengths are what the customer is going to realize. I think that’s the exciting component that’s really changed dramatically, especially over the last 10 years, and even more so over the last five. Robert Dutt: That speaks to the fact that you’re coming in as vice president of the global partner ecosystem, rather than vice president of channel sales or vice president of partner programs. I’m guessing, especially from that latter point about the co-sell and multi-partner arrangement becoming much more accepted and more of a default, that it’s a meaningful and purposeful distinction. What changes day to day when you call it an ecosystem, or when you think of it as an ecosystem, rather than a channel? Kevin Kennedy: I think your point is well made. The title and our nomenclature – ecosystem versus channel, or ecosystem versus partner – are intentional. Again, it goes back to illustrating the necessity of multiple people with varying levels of expertise in a variety of domains. All of them are required to bring a customer a solution and drive an outcome. It actually makes things more complex in some regards. From my lens, at the end of the day, what do we want to sell? We want to sell Red Hat products and our platforms into a customer. In years gone by, that might have been a much more simplistic arrangement. Our sales teams would call on a customer, represent only what we’re good at, and get that deal done. That no longer remains the case. I have to make sure we’re selling the value of Red Hat’s portfolio not just to the customer. I’ve also got to make sure the systems integrator sees how we can bring value to the solutions they’re going to represent to their customer base. I’ve got to represent the value of Red Hat to the hyperscalers – why they should care about us and how we may drive consumption in their marketplaces. I’ve got to bring value to the distributors and explain why they want to put resources around our product portfolio. I need to show them how our portfolio is going to help accelerate some of the more profitable lines they represent. On one hand, the ecosystem model illustrates the necessity for all of us to come together. On the other hand, it invites complexity from a go-to-market standpoint because everybody’s my customer. That’s traditionally been true in distribution, where a lot of my heritage comes from. We used to have the adage that we’re nobody’s customer and everybody’s customer, because I have to constantly sell the value of why we exist and why we should matter to you, and how we can help you be successful. Robert Dutt: That must make it an interesting challenge to structure programs when it’s no longer as simple as, “You are a reseller, therefore you fit in box A.” Now you’ve got to get creative with your programs and incentives in order to keep partners excited about what you’re doing, engaged with your platforms, and recognizing where you’re headed and why that might be valuable to them. Kevin Kennedy: I’ve got to construct a program with incentives that look at presales and the whole customer-management lifecycle. It’s no longer just, “We’ve got a product and a contract for that product that’s going to be sold.” Now I’ve got to think about adoption. I’ve got to think about how we make that product more pervasive through an organization. I’ve got to ensure that everything we said was going to be done when we presented the solution is actually coming to fruition, so the customer sees a return on that investment. If they don’t, I’m going to be a one-and-done. If they do, it’s going to give me an opportunity to have conversations around other things we can bring to bear that might provide similar or even better outcomes than what they did initially with us. Robert Dutt: When you did the program refresh, you said it was built around simplicity, predictability and profitability – three words that come up a lot in channel chief conversations, for obvious reasons. I don’t think those are unique to Red Hat, but along with what you’ve already touched on, what did you see or hear from partners about what they were experiencing that made those changes the priority at this time? Kevin Kennedy: That’s a good question. When I joined Red Hat, I observed that we weren’t necessarily meeting partners where they were. We were still thinking about the way things had been in years gone by. We were typically putting all of our rewards – and, by the way, they were plentiful – around the resale of our products. That ship had sailed. The ecosystem had evolved considerably, but we hadn’t necessarily evolved with it. What we tried to do, especially with the incentives we launched in January, was meet partners where they are. That means we have to bifurcate our incentive structure. We’ve got sellers at those partner organizations, and we need to make sure we’re targeting incentives on the front end, at the deal and transaction level, to get them excited about moving Red Hat products. Primarily, I look at that as a great opportunity for customer acquisition. There are a lot of places where we haven’t been, and those sellers are going to be able to introduce us to those customers. They have respected and long-tenured relationships that are going to help us land our objectives, which is to have the Red Hat portfolio consumed there. Similarly, we’ve got to make sure we’re incentivizing the firms to make the investments necessary to upskill their people and ensure they have the technical requirements and technical capabilities to deliver our solutions. We’re showing them a path from whatever managed services they currently provide in the enterprise to how they can include Red Hat as part of that. That’s going to be accretive to their service capabilities and to their profitability. We’re ensuring that we have both the front end and the back end covered. Again, we’re meeting partners where they are in the market, rather than saying that we only care about what they’re going to do for us from a product standpoint. We recognize that services are probably the most profitable component of their business. How do we translate the sale of our products into an increase in their services business, which is going to be accretive to their overall profitability? Robert Dutt: The nice part about that approach, even if you are coming from playing catch-up a little bit, is that there isn’t quite as much need to educate or incentivize partners to come around to where you’re going. You’re setting it up based on where they’re at today. Kevin Kennedy: Exactly. Recognizing that partners need a lot of hand-holding and a lot of our Red Hat engagement isn’t necessarily true. In many cases, partners have a level of sophistication that’s beyond what we would even address in a traditional enablement program. Now it’s about leveraging all those skills and competencies and translating them into what that means for Red Hat and how that accelerates adoption of our portfolio. From a partner standpoint, what does our portfolio mean to them in terms of plugging into what they’re already doing from a go-to-market standpoint? It puts more bullets in the gun when they’re talking to a customer. Robert Dutt: One of the areas of opportunity right now has to be the whole Broadcom-VMware situation, which has created a lot of disruption for partners, customers and pretty much everyone. Red Hat is obviously positioned well in that space, but capturing the opportunity through the channel is different from simply having the right technology on the shelf. How are you helping partners have that conversation with customers, especially those who are frustrated and interested in other options but aren’t necessarily ready to make the big jump? Kevin Kennedy: When the whole Broadcom situation first transpired, I think we all saw it as a generational opportunity to make a land grab. We all had varying degrees of success. And when I say “we all,” I don’t just mean Red Hat, but others that play in this space as well. Where we’ve seen a tremendous acceleration in our opportunity is by changing the conversation. When we go out with one of our partners and talk to customers about what they’re doing from a virtualization perspective, it’s no longer simply about moving off VMware onto Red Hat, for instance. It’s about modernization. It’s about making sure that the customer is prepared for its technology journey – moving from virtualization and modernizing its data centre toward the AI conversation that I’m sure we’ll get to in a moment. Red Hat and our partners can help customers on that journey and accelerate it without requiring a rip-and-replace approach or a complete transformation of their entire infrastructure. They can leverage the things they may do with us today to move off VMware and into a more modernized, virtualized, containerized and Kubernetes-based environment. That prepares them to take the next step into AI. It’s not a step back. It’s not a step sideways. It’s a step forward from their initial investment with us. Robert Dutt: It is 2026, and we’ve been talking for 12 or 13 minutes now, so I am legally required to ask an AI question at this point. You’ve been pretty straightforward in saying that virtualization, automation and hybrid cloud are still the real revenue drivers, while AI is more of a near-future opportunity. I respect that honesty, and I think it probably maps closely with what partners are telling you about where they are today. But where does that leave the partner who’s getting pressure from customers to have an AI story right now? Do you lead with the infrastructure story, or do you lead with AI and then backfill toward virtualization, automation and hybrid cloud? Kevin Kennedy: I think we lead with the hybrid modernization and automation play first, and then segue into the AI discussion. Part of what we’ve seen over the last year, especially, is the need to separate AI reality from AI hype. Everybody talks about AI, and I think the pockets of success have come from partners who are listening to customers and giving them the counsel and advice that they don’t need to boil the ocean. Let’s start with some very specific processes that the customer could look to automate by leveraging AI technology and Red Hat technology. Then the customer will be able to see an immediate win and a return on that initial investment. From there, we can see where to grow. For most customers, it’s not too different from us as consumers. We think of AI and ChatGPT, and all of these things where we’re going to be able to ask a whole bunch of questions and get smart answers back to help inform us about where to go. For a lot of customers, that’s debilitating. They don’t even know where to start. The whole thing is a massive labyrinth of issues they’re trying to sort through. Every partner that can go in and provide consultative advice – saying, “We don’t need to look at everything. Let’s start with some very direct things that you say require a lot of manual intervention or take up a lot of cycles” – can leverage AI technology to circumvent a lot of that. They can make processes that took weeks or months translate into hours or minutes. What productivity increase do you see as a result? That’s an immediate win and a return on the initial investment. I think the partners that understand what collaboration looks like in this space are also going to be successful, because AI forces us to talk to others and play well with others. Even for us, we’ve enjoyed a lot of recent announcements around collaborative partnerships with NVIDIA, Dell, Cisco and others. We’re doing these things together. It’s not because we each woke up one day and said, “I really want to build a partnership with NVIDIA,” or, “I really want to build a better partnership with Cisco.” We were forced to have those conversations because of the outcomes customers expect. We realized that while we have a really important and robust piece of the solution, it’s only a piece of the pie, and the customer wants the whole pie. How do we orchestrate and architect it together so that we collaborate and go to the customer together and say, “Here’s what we can do for you. Here’s your whole pie”? Robert Dutt: You spent years on the distribution side, as you said earlier. A lot of your career was spent there. Now you’re managing some of those same companies, or the companies they’ve become over time, as a vendor. I’m curious: has your background in distribution changed what you actually ask of distributors, or what you think vendors typically ask of distributors but either shouldn’t or should ask more of? Kevin Kennedy: I tell anybody who wants to be involved in the ecosystem that if you’ve worked in distribution, that’s your MBA of channel engagement. You learn so much because, when I was at TD, for instance, I was doing business with every major OEM in the world, each with different expectations and demands. I was running a business on basis points. Understanding how to get the greatest efficiencies in the sales model and how to reap the greatest amount of profit in order to continue investing in the business prepared me better for the ecosystem role I have today. Even when I got to Red Hat, I think the way we leveraged distribution was much more traditional. We appreciated distributors for the financial piece they brought to the equation. That continues to be a critical thing that distribution adds to technology in general: they’re a financial backbone for a lot of the investments we’re all making. But distributors were also viewed as providing logistics and operational efficiencies. While that’s still part of what they do, it’s just a small part of what they do today. I look at distributors as aggregators. We talked about how one, two, five or seven partners may touch every transaction a customer buys. There’s no better place to bring all of that together than within distribution. Distributors have developed their own great level of sophistication. They’ve got technical expertise across multiple vendor lines. They’ve made tremendous investments in AI on their own, and they have specialists who are trained, competent and capable. I’m leaning on them to do a lot of the enablement for me. When I look at how we go to market with all these different partner types – whether it’s hyperscalers, OEMs, GSIs or ISVs – I can go to distribution, which is also doing business across all those same partner types, and say, “How do we work more effectively together to develop a really cohesive go-to-market strategy?” The distributor is the aggregator. It can go to the partners we all share in common – the WWTs, CDWs, Softchoices and Mobias of the world – and say, “How can you bring all this together for us to present to these partners, so they can go talk to a customer and have a holistic solution to put in front of them?” Distributors represent that capability for me. We’re leaning in hard with distribution, certainly on the legacy and traditional things they bring to bear, but more importantly on the forward-looking investments they’re making in their own enterprises that are going to help accelerate partner adoption of our solutions. Robert Dutt: Close to home, data sovereignty is a major issue for Canadian organizations right now. Between government guidance and some muscle being put behind that, there’s a growing concern about where data resides and the whole CLOUD Act question. Do you see that showing up in partner conversations in Canada, and how does Red Hat’s story change in that context, if it does? Kevin Kennedy: It’s a prevalent and very relevant conversation today in Canada, certainly in EMEA and APAC – essentially everywhere outside of the United States. It’s forced us to re-evaluate how we’re going to market in those environments. It changes the perspective on simply talking about the hyperscalers. It changes the perspective on what a sovereign cloud looks like and who the players are. It’s introducing us to players in spaces such as telecom, where telcos are now looking more like the sovereign cloud providers of the future. How do we build a secure solution, working on a public cloud, private cloud or sovereign cloud provider, that will be required – especially in government and GOE spaces – and provide them with the opportunities they’ll need in the future? It started to emerge perhaps at the end of last year, but it’s now a massive topic of conversation with us, and I think that’s going to continue. When we talk about AI, this is going to be a big component as well. How do we protect this data, and how do we have it reside in a secure environment that’s critical to government agencies and how they operate every day? Robert Dutt: Do you see Red Hat partners as having a major untapped or under-realized opportunity right now? Kevin Kennedy: I still think virtualization is a major, major untapped market. We’re hot on the customer-acquisition trail. Traditionally, we’ve grown through established customer relationships that have been great to us over the years. We’ve made mutual investments in those relationships, and we’re certainly going to continue that. But we’ve got to find new business. I think AI is the accelerant in that. It gives us a forum for conversations around what we’ve built. Anybody who has made an investment in our core portfolio has a springboard to get to where they want to go relative to AI. The partnerships I referenced with NVIDIA, Cisco, Dell, HPE and others are great catalysts for opening discussions with customers who perhaps didn’t know Red Hat before. I sometimes think about it this way – and this is probably an oversimplified way to put it – but for years we all bought laptops that ran on Intel chips. “Intel Inside” was a great marketing ploy for a whole host of reasons. I kind of see Red Hat that way a little bit: Red Hat inside. We’re going to be the underpinning of a lot of solutions that customers are going to buy in the future. They may not even know that Red Hat is running in there, and I’m not sure that we care. We want to be that secure platform that provides mobility from the cloud to on-premises environments, with seamless motion back and forth. We want to provide the level of security that’s going to be required, whether that’s in a sovereign environment or in our current state, where data security is the utmost concern. We want to be the underpinning that allows all that stuff to run effectively and efficiently, and gives customers portability and an open concept. Whether or not the customer actually knows Red Hat is there, I’m not sure that matters that much to us from the customer lens. It matters more in terms of how we’re going to work with some of the other partner routes we’ve talked about, especially given the ecosystem discussion. Robert Dutt: I’m curious what you’d like to see partners doing more, better or differently for the benefit of Red Hat, yes, but especially for their own businesses and where the business is going. Kevin Kennedy: I want to be a catalyst for them to sell autonomously. I think OEMs have often seen themselves in an outsized role when it comes to going to market with partners. We’ve acted as though partners need us in order to deliver the solution, or need a Red Hat badge in order to get validated by the customer. Certainly, there may still be an element of that, but I’ve found that partners’ customer relationships and the trust they’ve already earned with those customers supersede our need to be necessarily involved. I’m looking at ways to pour gasoline on that fire. How can I get out of the way and let partners move at a quicker pace than they may have in the past? Certainly, we’re part of the solution. We want to make sure partners have everything necessary, whether that’s training, enablement, demo equipment, proofs of concept or executive briefing centres – whatever they need to ensure they have the utmost confidence to position a solution that contains Red Hat products in the best light with the customer. But we know partners don’t need our help to have that sales conversation. They don’t necessarily need our help to deliver the services after the sale, to do the migration or to provide managed services, because they already have that expertise. We just need to make sure they feel confident that they can incorporate us into that motion. That’s really my focus, even from an ecosystem program standpoint. I want to put the incentives in a place that accelerates all the things partners are already good at and simply includes us in that motion. Robert Dutt: It sounds from those last couple of answers that you’re quite happy being the underpinning, the foundation behind either the customer solution or the partner’s sales motion. How does that shape what you’re focused on personally and program-wise in terms of what partners can expect from you and from Red Hat over the balance of the year and beyond? Kevin Kennedy: My mantra has been to do more with less. What I mean by that is that the partners who already fit the profile I’ve been describing – those with core competencies and skills, strong market presence, tremendous customer relationships, and investments in upskilling their people with the technical and sales expertise to represent Red Hat well in the marketplace – are the partners I want to invest in to a high degree. The partners who may traditionally have just wanted to put our logo on their website and clicked through to become a partner because they wanted to resell or perform more fulfilment activities – that’s great, and I still want to welcome those partners. But those are not the partners around whom I’m going to build programs or in whom I’m going to invest heavily. They’re not the partners where I’m going to continue putting direct resources side by side with them to win in the marketplace. I want to go deeper and wider with fewer partners who have the investments and skills necessary to bring customers the outcomes and efficiencies they’re looking for. Robert Dutt: That’s a great place to leave it. Kevin, thank you very much for taking the time. Kevin Kennedy: Thank you for having me. It’s been a great time, and I appreciate the opportunity. Robert Dutt: There you have it, Kevin Kennedy from Red Hat. I’d like to thank Kevin for his time today. He’s someone who has thought seriously about how this business actually works from multiple vantage points, and that comes through. Thanks for listening as well. A couple of things I’m taking away from this one. The “Intel Inside” framing that Kevin used – the idea that Red Hat is increasingly going to be the underpinning of solutions that customers buy and partners build, without necessarily being the name on the box – is a significant strategic statement. It’s a bet that being foundational is worth more than being front and centre. It’s worth watching how that plays out for partners who are building practices around Red Hat technology, or potentially are. And the ecosystem-versus-channel distinction doesn’t come off as just a title change. When you’re talking about a single customer engagement that might bring together a cloud provider, a services integrator, a software specialist and a reseller, all at the same table, the question of how you build a program and reward structure around that is unsolved across the industry. Red Hat is working on it, but so are a lot of other people. For Canadian partners specifically, the data sovereignty conversation is one to pay attention to. Kevin was candid that it’s reshaping how Red Hat thinks about going to market outside the United States, and the Canadian regulatory environment is only going to make that more pressing over the next few years. If you found this useful, please follow or subscribe wherever you get your podcasts. We’re on Apple Podcasts, Spotify, YouTube and most major directories. Ratings and reviews are always appreciated. Until next time, I’m Robert Dutt for ChannelBuzz.ca, and I’ll see you in the channel.

Today’s headline news for Canadian IT solution providers: ePlus acquires Daymark Solutions: The solution provider bought the Boston-area Microsoft cloud partner for roughly $36 million, adding Azure, Microsoft 365, and security capabilities. Daymark ranked No. 41 on CRN‘s 2026 Solution Provider 500. ePlus says the deal is the latest in a string of about 30 acquisitions and significantly expands its Northeast footprint. Cohesity expands Aspire Global Partner Program: The data security vendor has added new partner specializations in AI data security, cloud services, and backup and recovery, along with broader rebates and simplified training. Cohesity says the updated program, which took effect Aug. 1, 2026, rewards partner teaming and services expertise. Exclaimer launches MSP Connect for managed service providers: The new global program offers consumption-based billing, self-service provisioning, NFR licensing, and PSA integrations with ConnectWise, HaloPSA, and Kaseya BMS. Exclaimer says the program is designed to remove billing and management friction for MSPs selling email signature management as a compliance and brand-consistency layer. In Brief: IBM Consulting deploys thousands of AI agents: IBM says it has rolled out thousands of AI agents across enterprise security projects, productizing agentic AI for cybersecurity use cases. CrowdStrike warns frontier AI demands “greatest mobilization” ever: Chief business officer Daniel Bernard told CRN that AI-accelerated threats require what he calls cybersecurity’s greatest mobilization, outlining how the company is positioning partners to defend against frontier AI risks. CRN publishes 2026 Fast Growth 150: The annual list ranks solution providers by two-year growth rate. Caylent, EchoStor, and Park Place Technologies are among the top 25 fastest-growing companies. ChannelPro names Top 20 MSPs for 2026: The annual list highlights what the publication calls “bold, relentlessly innovative leaders” in the managed services space. Kaseya embeds agentic AI into MSP service delivery: The IT management platform vendor is bringing autonomous AI agents into its core MSP tools, according to an Aug. 24 report. Read Full Transcript Welcome to The Buzz from ChannelBuzz.ca, I’m Robert Dutt, today is Wednesday, August 26, and here’s what’s happening in the channel today. Solution provider ePlus has acquired the assets of fellow solution provider Daymark Solutions. According to CRN, ePlus announced the deal on Monday, paying roughly $36 million for the Boston-area Microsoft cloud partner. Daymark ranked No. 41 on CRN’s 2026 Solution Provider 500 and brings advanced Microsoft Azure, Microsoft 365, and security capabilities to ePlus. The acquisition is the latest in a string of about 30 deals ePlus has done, and it significantly expands the company’s footprint in the Northeast while deepening its Microsoft cloud services portfolio. For Canadian solution providers watching the M&A market, this deal is worth noting because it shows how midmarket Microsoft cloud practices are becoming acquisition targets as larger VARs look to build density in specific geographies. ePlus said in a statement that Daymark’s team and customer base will be integrated into its existing operations. Data security and management vendor Cohesity has expanded its Aspire Global Partner Program with new specializations, broader rebates, and simplified training requirements. The Aug. 25 announcement adds partner specializations around AI data security, cloud services, and backup and recovery, along with expanded profitability through increased rebates and deal registration protection. Cohesity says the updated program took effect on Aug. 1, 2026, and is designed to reward partner teaming, services expertise, and what the company calls “customer obsession.” The program is global, so Canadian partners are eligible for the new specializations immediately. The rebate expansion is the piece to watch here: Cohesity is moving toward outcome-based incentives that favor partners who wrap services around the platform rather than pure transactional resellers, which mirrors a broader trend across infrastructure vendors. Email signature management vendor Exclaimer has launched a dedicated partner program for MSPs called MSP Connect. The Aug. 19 announcement includes consumption-based billing, self-service provisioning, and direct integrations with ConnectWise, HaloPSA, and Kaseya BMS. Exclaimer is also offering NFR licensing so MSPs can run the platform internally before pitching it to clients. The program is global, so Canadian MSPs are eligible from day one. The pitch here is that email signatures have become a bigger compliance and brand-consistency issue as phishing attacks get more sophisticated, and MSPs can fold Exclaimer into their security and productivity stacks without adding billing complexity. According to Exclaimer, the PSA integrations mean invoice line items and tenant management should live inside tools MSPs are already using. IBM Consulting says it has deployed thousands of AI agents across security projects for enterprise clients. CRN reported the initiative on Aug. 25 as part of Big Blue’s broader push to productize agentic AI for cybersecurity use cases. CrowdStrike chief business officer Daniel Bernard says frontier AI demands what he calls cybersecurity’s “greatest mobilization” ever. In an Aug. 25 interview with CRN, Bernard outlined how the company is positioning partners to defend against AI-accelerated threats. CRN has published its 2026 Fast Growth 150 list, with the top 25 solution providers ranked by two-year growth rate. Caylent, EchoStor, and Park Place Technologies are among the fastest-growing companies. The ChannelPro Network has unveiled its Top 20 MSPs for 2026, an annual recognition of providers the publication calls “bold, relentlessly innovative leaders.” Kaseya is bringing agentic AI deeper into MSP service delivery. ChannelE2E reported on Aug. 24 that the IT management platform vendor is embedding autonomous AI agents into its core MSP tools. Full details and links in the show notes or the blog post. Later today on In The Channel, Red Hat vice president of the global partner ecosystem Kevin Kennedy sits down with me to talk about how the partner business has shifted away from swim lanes, where the VMware modernization opportunity stands for Canadian partners, and what data sovereignty actually means in practice. And if you haven’t heard it yet, yesterday on In The Channel, Cisco Canada president Raj Juneja walked me through the company’s new Sovereign Critical Infrastructure portfolio and what trust-based licensing looks like for partners selling air-gapped infrastructure to Canadian public sector clients. That’s how we’re seeing the headlines today. I’m Robert Dutt for ChannelBuzz.ca, thanks for listening. Have a great day.

Raj Juneja, president of Cisco Canada In this episode of In The Channel, we speak with Raj Juneja, president of Cisco Canada, about the launch of Cisco’s Sovereign Critical Infrastructure portfolio in Canada – the second market worldwide after EMEA, where it debuted last September. The portfolio spans Cisco’s networking, security, compute, collaboration, and Splunk offerings, configured for air-gapped, on-premises deployment. The differentiator is trust-based licensing: Cisco can’t remotely access, control, or disable the products – control sits entirely with the customer. It’s certified to FIPS 140-2/3 and Common Criteria standards, and aligned with Canada’s ITSG-33 framework. Juneja confirmed the offering is open to the full partner ecosystem, not restricted to any one partner, with certifications consistent with existing Cisco portfolio requirements. Distribution plays its usual role. Target customers are government, financial services, healthcare, and AI providers – organizations that need to run sensitive systems without cloud connectivity or foreign vendor access. IDC research shows more than half of Canadian organizations are increasing scrutiny of their critical system providers, but intent is running well ahead of deployment. Partner economics details are expected in the coming weeks. The launch comes as HPE has been active in sovereign infrastructure in Canada, and the federal government funds sovereign AI compute through ISED’s AI Sovereign Compute Infrastructure Program. Read Full Transcript Robert Dutt: Hello and welcome to In The Channel from ChannelBuzz.ca, bringing news and information to the Canadian IT channel community for the last sixteen years. I’m Robert Dutt, editor at ChannelBuzz.ca and your host for the show. This morning on The Buzz, we covered the news: Cisco launched its Sovereign Critical Infrastructure portfolio in Canada. Here’s what that actually means and why it matters for the channel. Cisco has taken its core networking, security, compute, collaboration and Splunk portfolio and configured it for air-gapped, on-premises deployment – systems that sit in facilities customers own and run, with no connection to the outside internet. The key differentiator is what Cisco calls trust-based licensing. Cisco can’t remotely access, control or disable the products. That control sits entirely with the customer. This is aimed at government, financial institutions, healthcare and other critical infrastructure providers – organizations that need to run sensitive systems without depending on constant cloud connectivity or foreign vendor access. The portfolio is certified to FIPS 140-2/3 and Common Criteria standards, and is aligned with Canada’s ITSG-33 framework for achieving Authority to Operate on mission-critical government systems. Canada is the second market for this portfolio after EMEA, where it launched last September. This comes at a time when data sovereignty has become a board-level priority. IDC says that more than half of Canadian organizations are increasing scrutiny of their critical systems providers, but intent is running well ahead of deployment. That gap between wanting sovereignty and actually having it is where the channel plays. For partners, the big questions are about access, economics and the services opportunity. To help answer those, I spoke with Raj Juneja, president of Cisco Canada. Let’s get right into it – my chat with Raj Juneja. Robert Dutt: Raj, thanks for taking the time. I appreciate it. Raj Juneja: More than happy to take the time, Robert. I’m looking forward to the conversation. Robert Dutt: The announcement talks about the infrastructure being available through Cisco and its partners, and Bell is front and centre in the announcement. Is this an opportunity that’s open to the broader partner ecosystem, or is it limited to a set of partners? Regardless of which way that goes, what does a partner need? What are the “you must be this tall to ride the ride” specifications in terms of specializations, certifications and clearances to sell and deploy the portfolio? Raj Juneja: This is not, in any way, shape or form, limited or restricted to any one particular partner. This announcement is really about addressing the demand we’ve been receiving from our customers to have more control and autonomy over their digital infrastructure and their data. We’re happy to bring this to our partner community, but there is nothing that limits or restricts it to any one specific partner. The certifications that partners hold – if you’re speaking specifically to partner-oriented certifications – are no different from what we currently have for the rest of our portfolio. Robert Dutt: So it’s broadly available. Basically, if you’ve got customers who are interested in this, you have access to it, by the sounds of it. Raj Juneja: That is absolutely our intention. We’re not looking to restrict this in any way. It’s an offering – the portfolio that we have today – that’s being offered in a different form to address the needs of our customers for control and the ability to manage their infrastructure on their own. Robert Dutt: Especially for smaller partners, are distributors at play here? If so, what role do you see them playing both at launch and further out, as this has a chance to develop an ecosystem around it? Raj Juneja: Distribution serves an incredible purpose in our channel community. As I said before, I don’t see this being any different in terms of the way we go to market and leverage our existing, broad set of distribution partners today. This is intended to address the needs of customers who are looking for control and choice over their own digital infrastructure and data. Ultimately, the path they take to acquire the technology will be no different from how they currently buy today. Robert Dutt: Let’s talk a little bit about the commercial model here. Can you elaborate on what trust-based licensing means and how it differs from the usual Cisco model? Raj Juneja: Trust-based licensing effectively means that, when you don’t have any connection to the cloud, there is no capability for us to remotely disable the products. Nor is there any requirement for license governance or administration. This goes back to the choice and control that we talked about. The onus is primarily on customers to ensure that they are adhering to the licensing they’ve acquired from Cisco. Effectively, the only way we can offer the air-gapped licensing that we have is through trust-based licensing. Robert Dutt: In terms of partner economics, is this pretty much the same as any Cisco engagement? What can you tell me about revenues in terms of subscription, perpetual licensing or something new? Basically, how do partners earn on this? Is it the same as ever, or is it a combination of one-time and recurring revenue? Raj Juneja: I can tell you that there will be more clarity on the specifics around partner profitability as the announcement comes out. The main thing to take note of is that, typically, when we offer new solutions and bring them to market, our partner ecosystem has a clear path to get the technology into the hands of the customer base. Profitability is always top of mind for Cisco. I think there will be greater clarity in the coming weeks, but we’re very excited about being the first country after EMEA to launch this. Robert Dutt: Air-gapped, on-premises infrastructure is a pretty complex thing to deploy and manage. What do you see as the split for partners between product and services? In terms of the services side, is Cisco seeing this as a “deploy and hand it over” kind of engagement, or is it also going to be a “deploy and manage” managed services opportunity for partners? Raj Juneja: Because it’s in the hands of our customers, it’s going to depend very much on how they want to configure the choice and control they have. That goes back to working very closely with the partner ecosystem to determine the role partners will play. Our partners have been coming to us and seeking the ability to solve these demands for our customer base. They are ready and willing to help customers configure and adapt, as they’ve done in the past with other on-premises deployments. I see this following similar lines and being very similar to the way our partner ecosystem has helped customers deploy other on-premises solutions. Robert Dutt: So there’s nothing precluding this from being delivered as a managed service. It comes down to what customers are comfortable with and what they want – and, in some cases, what is legally available to them, given the type of infrastructure issues we’re talking about. Raj Juneja: Correct. Robert Dutt: Splunk is central to the security and observability story, and I know it’s a subject near and dear to your heart in particular. My understanding is that Splunk has traditionally been a data platform that benefits from connectivity to the cloud. How much of that capability exists in an air-gapped environment, and what do partners need to deliver to support that? How do they help customers get to the cloud when appropriate? Raj Juneja: Just to correct you, Splunk is offered both on-premises and in a cloud version, and has been for quite some time. I don’t think this will be any different in terms of requirements. Splunk is already configurable to be handled in an on-premises manner. In fact, we have a number of customers that leverage that choice and control in an on-premises fashion. That’s why the on-premises version of Splunk exists today: for customers that are heavily regulated. For customers and verticals that are looking for choice and control and want to take a hybrid approach, it will be in their hands to determine what data they want ingested and how they want Splunk configured on-premises to control that data, versus what they want to continue leveraging through our cloud-based offering. It can absolutely work in a hybrid fashion. Robert Dutt: You mentioned a little earlier that partners have been coming to you asking about sovereign capabilities. Can you quantify that or give me some colour around what you’re hearing from partners in terms of customer demand for sovereign AI? What are you seeing and hearing when you’re talking to customers about demand for sovereign AI today? Raj Juneja: Absolutely. There’s no question that, when you look at AI data centres and AI providers, and specifically at what’s happening in Canada with the AI for All strategy, it comes down to addressing questions around control, data and where that data resides. Those questions have been coming forward to our partner community as well as to Cisco. When it comes to AI-based offerings, Sovereign Critical Infrastructure is intended to help address that choice and control for AI providers. It allows them to take their AI offerings to market in a way that addresses on-premises requirements or hybrid deployments, because they may also be leveraging hyperscalers in certain cloud-based environments. Robert Dutt: You mentioned earlier that Canada will be the first market beyond EMEA to roll out this particular offering. My understanding is that it’s been available in EMEA for eight or nine months. As you’ve had a chance to talk to your peers in Cisco’s EMEA regions, is there anything you’ve learned that adds colour to how this is coming to market, or to the shape of the opportunity they’re seeing, that you think would be relevant to Canada? Raj Juneja: As I said before, Canada has big ambitions for AI, as does the rest of the world. There’s no question that the ability to turn that ambition into reality is dependent on having the right infrastructure. The demand that EMEA has been seeing, and the reason we’re so excited about launching this in Canada, is specifically about turning that ambition into reality. There is an acceleration in the ability to run AI workloads in data centres and AI factories. The key is the security and autonomy we’ve talked about – deploying AI on your own terms. That has led to the demand. EMEA has been the first beneficiary of that, and I was very excited when Canada was chosen as the second country or region to address this demand and help meet the needs of our customer base. Robert Dutt: Without getting too far into the weeds or potentially tipping your hand on the future, who do you think will be the early, slam-dunk customers? Who are the customers you can point partners toward today and say, “Go get it”? Raj Juneja: The thing with sovereignty is that it’s not one-size-fits-all. It really comes down to choice and control. If you look at government, it’s very much focused on that control piece. Government is absolutely going to be an interested party. But if you look at regulated industries such as financial services and healthcare, you’ll see that they still have requirements around adhering to regulations. Having the ability to exercise choice and control is also very important to them. I see this addressing multiple industries and verticals. I think this is a great opportunity not only for Cisco, but also for our partner ecosystem. Robert Dutt: Let’s talk about the competitive environment to bring it home. HPE has been talking about sovereign infrastructure in Canada for a while now. Microsoft has a story there as well. What’s Cisco’s answer to the “Why Cisco?” question, whether that’s against peer competitors or a “build it yourself” solution? Is the edge the breadth of the portfolio, the trust-based licensing, the partner model, or something else? What’s the wedge for Cisco? Raj Juneja: I can’t really comment on our competition or on what they are doing or choose to do. For us, we’ve been a supplier of leading-edge technology in Canada for more than 30 years. This is our opportunity to provide even more industry-leading technology to that customer base. The keys here are really the choice and control customers are looking for. I see a great opportunity for our long-standing Cisco customers to consider another offering from Cisco. For customers that are looking for Cisco to become an infrastructure provider when they weren’t previously leveraging us, I think this presents a great opportunity for them to consider Cisco. Robert Dutt: Given the current opportunity and market situation, I think anything around sovereignty is going to be really interesting to watch over the balance of this year and into next year. I’ll be very interested to see how this hits the market as it gets out there. Thank you for taking the time ahead of launch to tell us what you can at this point. Raj Juneja: Thanks very much. I enjoyed the conversation. Robert Dutt: There you have it, Raj Juneja from Cisco Canada. I’d like to thank Raj for his time. It was obviously a busy launch day for him and his team. To everyone listening, thanks for tuning in. Here are my takeaways. Cisco is making a meaningful bet here. The trust-based licensing model, where Cisco genuinely can’t touch the systems once they’re deployed, is a real differentiator. The fact that the offering is open to the full partner ecosystem, and not just a handful of larger partners, is good news for the channel. The services opportunity around deploying and managing air-gapped infrastructure is significant, and the Splunk integration gives partners that already carry Cisco networking a cross-sell story. Some questions remain, though. Partner economics – how partners actually earn on this – is still unclear, with Raj pointing to more details in the coming weeks. The competitive picture is also wide open. HPE has been aggressive on sovereign infrastructure in Canada. Microsoft has its own sovereignty offerings, and the federal government is actively funding sovereign AI compute. Cisco’s breadth – networking, security, compute, collaboration and Splunk in one stack – is the pitch. But we’ll need to see how that plays out in customer decisions. If you’re a partner with public sector or regulated-industry customers, this is worth understanding now. The demand is real, it’s running ahead of deployment, and the opportunity to help close that gap is where the channel plays. If you enjoyed this episode, follow or subscribe to the podcast. You can find us on Apple Podcasts, Spotify, YouTube and most podcast directories. Ratings and reviews are always appreciated, and they help other people in the channel find the show. Until next time, I’m Robert Dutt for ChannelBuzz.ca, and I’ll see you in the channel.

Today’s headline news for Canadian IT solution providers: [Cisco Canada]: The company this morning launched its Sovereign Critical Infrastructure portfolio, making Canada the first market outside EMEA to receive the offering. The company says the configurable portfolio spans core networking, security, compute, collaboration, and Splunk analytics, with air-gapped deployment options where required. According to Cisco Canada, the offering is aligned with ITSG-33 and most of the on-premises portfolio is IPv6-ready, FIPS 140-2/3 certified, and Common Criteria certified. Bell is the lead quoted partner. Read more on Cisco [ScanSource]: The distributor announced last week it will acquire value-added reseller and managed service provider MicroAge in a $220.5 million all-cash transaction expected to close on Sept. 30. The deal adds more than 2,400 U.S. customers and over 200 employees, and brings MicroAge’s hardware, professional services, and consulting expertise to ScanSource’s partners. Read more on Channel Dive [ESET Canada]: The company yesterday announced the winners of its 2026 Women in Cybersecurity Scholarship, naming Arthure Gélinas, Tsidkenu Tomori, and Sulaksa Jeevakumar as the three Canadian recipients. The program has awarded more than $50,000 to 14 women in Canada since expanding north in 2021. Read more on Business Insider [CrowdStrike]: The company is expanding Project QuiltWorks to midmarket companies through partners including Arrow Electronics, Pax8, and TD Synnex. CrowdStrike says the initiative integrates its AI-driven vulnerability discovery with partner services to deliver enterprise-grade protection to SMBs. Read more on Channel Dive [Palo Alto Networks]: The company and NTT Data say they have signed a three-year strategic pact targeting $1 billion in joint cybersecurity revenue, with NTT Data bringing more than 2,000 certified professionals and 20 cyber defense centers to the alliance. Read more on Channel Dive [Auvik]: The Canadian IT management platform provider says it promoted channel veteran Daniel Ochoa to chief revenue officer, with a mandate to expand the partner network and focus on AI-powered capabilities across North America, Latin America, and EMEA. Read more on Channel Dive [ChannelPro]: The publication unveiled its Top 20 MSPs for 2026, recognizing providers driving innovation, leadership, and impact in the channel. Read more on ChannelE2E Read Full Transcript Welcome to The Buzz from ChannelBuzz.ca, I’m Robert Dutt, today is Tuesday, August 25, 2026, and here’s what’s happening in the channel today. Cisco Canada this morning launched its Sovereign Critical Infrastructure portfolio, making Canada the first market outside EMEA to receive the offering. The company says the configurable portfolio spans core networking, security, compute, collaboration, and Splunk analytics, with air-gapped deployment options where required and control over access to systems and data sitting with the customer. According to Cisco Canada, the offering is aligned with ITSG-33, the foundation for Authority to Operate on mission-critical services, and most of the on-premises portfolio is IPv6-ready, FIPS 140-2/3 certified, and Common Criteria certified. The launch comes as Canadian organizations in critical sectors face increasing pressure to maintain control over their data and digital infrastructure amid rising sovereignty concerns. For channel partners, the move creates opportunities around assessment, deployment, and ongoing management of sovereign environments, particularly for regulated and government customers that need to demonstrate compliance with strict data residency and control standards. IT distributor ScanSource announced last week it will acquire value-added reseller and managed service provider MicroAge in a $220.5 million all-cash transaction expected to close on Sept. 30. The deal adds more than 2,400 U.S. customers and over 200 employees to ScanSource, and brings MicroAge’s hardware resale, professional services, and consulting expertise under the distributor’s umbrella. ScanSource Chairman and CEO Mike Baur told Channel Dive the acquisition is aimed at augmenting channel partners that lack their own customer service and support organizations, with plans to effectively rent MicroAge’s resources to partners who only pay if something closes. The deal reflects ScanSource’s broader strategy to cross-pollinate its technology advisor base with the MSP and VAR capabilities needed to deliver integration, implementation, and ongoing management services. Baur also noted that MicroAge’s Octum.ai consulting business could help technology advisors fill the AI expertise gap they currently face. For Canadian partners, the convergence of distribution and managed services is a signal that the traditional boundaries between partner types are eroding faster than many expected, and that distributors are increasingly willing to touch the end customer directly. ESET Canada yesterday announced the winners of its 2026 Women in Cybersecurity Scholarship, naming Arthure Gélinas, Tsidkenu Tomori, and Sulaksa Jeevakumar as the three Canadian recipients. According to ESET, the program has awarded more than $50,000 to 14 women in Canada since expanding north in 2021, with this year’s awards totaling $15,000 across three scholarships. Bob Bonneau, country manager at ESET Canada, said the recipients demonstrated an impressive combination of skill, leadership, and a genuine desire to make a difference in the industry. The winners will be recognized at a celebration at ESET’s Markham headquarters on Thursday, continuing a commitment that ESET says is one of the earliest initiatives of its kind in the cybersecurity industry. The three recipients come from the Greater Toronto Area, Montreal, and Ottawa, reflecting a geographic spread that ESET says mirrors the growth of cybersecurity hubs across the country. For the Canadian channel, the scholarship underscores the ongoing need to build a more diverse cybersecurity talent pipeline as demand continues to outpace supply, and it highlights a concrete way vendors can contribute to that pipeline beyond short-term hiring initiatives. In Brief – CrowdStrike expands Project QuiltWorks to midmarket companies through partners including Arrow Electronics, Pax8, and TD Synnex. Palo Alto Networks and NTT Data say they have signed a three-year strategic pact targeting $1 billion in joint cybersecurity revenue. Auvik promoted channel veteran Daniel Ochoa to chief revenue officer, with a mandate to expand the partner network and AI-powered capabilities. ChannelPro unveiled its Top 20 MSPs for 2026, recognizing providers driving innovation, leadership, and impact. Full details and links in the show notes or the blog post. Later today on In The Channel, my conversation with Raj Juneja, President of Cisco Canada, on the company’s new sovereign critical infrastructure portfolio for Canada. And if you haven’t heard it yet, check out my conversation with Tony Anscombe from ESET on why breached SMBs feel more confident, and where MSPs fit in the insurance collision. That’s how we’re seeing the headlines today. I’m Robert Dutt for ChannelBuzz.ca, thanks for listening. Have a great day.

ESET Chief Security Evangelist Tony Anscombe joins In The Channel to unpack the 2026 SMB Cyber Readiness Index. We discuss the confidence paradox, the collision between cyber insurance and MSPs, why AI headlines distract from phishing fundamentals, and why monthly micro-training is the antidote to checkbox compliance.

Dynabook Canada president and CEO Carmine Cinerari joins In The Channel to discuss the company's new nationwide distribution partnership with TD SYNNEX Canada, and what it looks like to execute a channel-first strategy when memory prices are rewriting the economics of endpoint hardware.

Coro chief executive Joe Sykora talks platform consolidation, automated alert remediation, and the agentic AI question reshaping how MSPs should think about their security stacks.

Wil Santiago, chief security and trust officer at Blackpoint Cyber, joins In The Channel to unpack the company's 2026 Annual Threat Report - and what thousands of real SOC incidents reveal about how attackers are using trusted credentials and IT tools to get inside MSP environments undetected.

Blumira unveils a universal AI command center for security tools, Vistera launches a Canadian-built professional services platform for SMBs, and CrowdStrike warns that Punk Spider ransomware attacks on MSPs are up 134 percent. Plus ConnectSecure expands M365 security, GTIA warns on AI adoption gaps, and Verizon channel chief Mark Tina departs for Humana.

Sanjib Sahoo joins the podcast to discuss Ingram Micro's record Q2 results and how the Xvantage platform is moving the channel from 'instinct to intelligence' with the new XI Hub and MCP Server.

Expel launches the first MDR for the full AI attack surface, Huntress CEO Kyle Hanslovan says autonomous AI attacks are already here, and Myriad360 acquires F3 Technology Partners to cross $1 billion in revenue. Plus Nutanix and Halo announce MCP integrations for MSPs, and CRN names its Annual Report Card winners. Here's your Wednesday, August 12 channel briefing.

Exabeam says it used to treat MSSPs like regular resellers, with deal-by-deal discounts that made margin predictability nearly impossible. Global channel chief Craig Patterson and senior director of service provider alliances Peter Stratis join In The Channel to explain what changed - and what it means for Canadian service providers building managed SIEM practices.

Schneider Electric debuts a multi-chemistry UPS platform for distributed environments, Ingram Micro says hundreds of partners are using its Xvantage Integration Hub and MCP Server, and D&H Distributing picks up Dell's full enterprise storage portfolio in the U.S. and Canada.

The new president of TD SYNNEX Canada talks about his transition from SHI, respecting Mitch Martin's 35-year legacy, and why Canadian channel players should be "proud and loud."

Michelle Biase has been president and managing director of HP Canada for eighteen months. In that time, the company has grown its Canadian sales team by fifty percent, shifted to a unified One HP go-to-market model, and watched AI PC sales accelerate to nearly two-thirds of PC volume. In this episode, she sits down with In the Channel to talk about what partners actually did with early AI PC seeding units, how HP IQ is landing in the channel, the practical realities of memory-driven pricing volatility, and why partners should be paying more attention to the software and solutions layer.

Access Group president Mark Sutor joins In The Channel to discuss the Trust X Alliance Global Leadership Summit, the TXA AI agent, and how Canadian partners fit into a rapidly expanding global peer community.

TD SYNNEX appoints Chris Fabes as President of Canada, Huntress warns of massive Azure CLI password spray attacks targeting non-human identities, and MSSPs face an employee retention problem driven by invisible manual work.

Exclusive Networks' Carrie Hopkins joins In The Channel to talk about building a hyper-focused cybersecurity distribution model in Canada, the launch of the Ignition channel incubator, and why some of what Exclusive is doing might remind certain channel veterans of something they've seen before.

OpenAI's inaugural Partner Network is officially live with $150 million in backing, Carbon60 represents Canada on the 2026 MSP 501, and RecordPoint has launched a channel-first global partner program.

HPE vice president of North America channel and partner ecosystem Jeremiah Jenson sits down with ChannelBuzz.ca for the final word on HPE Discover 2026, from the show floor temperature to the specific opportunities he sees for Canadian partners in networking, hybrid cloud, and the "great VM reset."

Microsoft fixes 570 flaws including 3 zero-days, Citrix gives partners a new services angle with Platform Flex, and AI compliance is moving from policy paper to recurring operations.

Xerox IT Solutions Canada executive vice president Curtis Dery joins In The Channel at HPE Discover 2026 to discuss the partner perspective on HPE's new 90/9 financing, expanded credit lines, channel-only product expansion, and why he believes AI has created a level playing field for partners for the first time in their careers.

Barracuda buys Evo Security for identity, Rewst rebuilds around MCP and AI agents, and Microsoft opens its July partner playbook with FY27 planning and Copilot specialization updates.

Former HP Canada ESSN lead and now Long View Systems EVP Dave Frederickson joins us live from HPE Discover 2026 with a perspective on the partner program, the real cost of the quote-cycle crisis, and why his AI conversations still start at the data layer.

Recorded on-site at HPE Discover in Las Vegas, this episode features Compugen chief customer officer Stéphan Wener on the company's HPE Canada Solution Provider of the Year win, its new Triple Platinum Plus status, and what he's seeing from Canadian customers navigating AI infrastructure decisions.

Brad Shapiro of HPE Financial Services explains new partner financing offers including the 90/9 Advantage, the rationale behind a 150 per cent credit expansion, and how IT asset disposition is becoming a critical piece of the AI infrastructure refresh.

We wraps up the week at HPE Discover with a reporter's notebook episode on the operational details, candid moments, and mechanical changes that surfaced in the channel leadership panel.

HPE's Justin McGarry makes the case at HPE Discover 2026 that Compute Ops Management has evolved beyond server monitoring into a platform that lets MSPs deliver higher-margin services at scale - with AI-driven sustainability forecasting and early agentic capabilities on the roadmap.

HPE Discover day three brings the economics argument: continuous AI agents cost $13,000 per month in the public cloud, while HPE's own MindStone platform runs 30 times cheaper on-prem. Plus, Vultr buys HPE and NVIDIA Blackwell Ultra gear, and Morpheus 9 launches with a migration freebie.

Recorded on-site at HPE Discover Las Vegas, Ben Fallon, vice president of worldwide channel and partner ecosystem networking sales at HPE, discusses self-driving networks, the SASE opportunity, and why November is a key date for networking partners.

HPE CEO Antonio Neri and networking chief Rami Rahim made the case Tuesday at HPE Discover 2026 that the network - not the GPU, not the server - is the real foundation of the AI era. Here are the announcements that matter for Canadian IT solution providers.

OpenAI launches a partner program and a $150 million investment fund for enterprise AI, GoWest.ai and Nucleus Networks represent Canada on GTIA's inaugural Innovate Awards shortlist, and new Cisco research shows 71 percent of Canadian organizations expect their networks to hit capacity limits within three years.

HPE's Jeremiah Jenson unpacks the Partner Growth Summit announcements - Juniper into Partner Ready Vantage, channel-only products including Zerto, and a new partner-branded services model - and what the "power of one" actually means for Canadian resellers and MSPs.

HPE used Monday's Partner Growth Summit at Discover 2026 to deliver a broad operational reset for channel partners - extending quote validity, expanding financing capacity, adding major channel-only portfolio territory in virtualization and disaster recovery, launching an explicit managed services bridge, and introducing competitive storage incentives ahead of the second half of the year.

HPE Discover 2026 opens today in Las Vegas. We sat down with Jeremiah Jenson, HPE's vice president of North America channel, to preview the show - from the "architecting AI starts with your network" theme to what the week means for Canadian partners watching from home.

HPE Discover opens in Las Vegas today with the partner-exclusive Partner Growth Summit leading the way. Also in Monday's briefing: Cato Networks launches 100-plus integrations, and Checkmarx data shows 95 per cent of CISOs are being pressured to delay security issues.

Josh Singh of Turning Point - the Vancouver solution provider that operates exclusively on Dell in the data center - brings a rare dual perspective to DTW: nearly a decade inside Dell followed by leading sales at one of Canada's most committed Dell partners. The conversation covers AI adoption, data resilience, and navigating a market in disruption.

Pax8 Beyond wraps in Salt Lake City with the Managed Intelligence Provider program and Microsoft Agent 365 in the spotlight, Arrow opens networked experience centers to help partners monetize AI, and Mitel taps a new channel chief ahead of a major communications refresh cycle.

Storage specialist Earl Gosick of ESTI Consulting Services brings a 35-year Prairies perspective to Dell Technologies World, covering AI infrastructure economics, the reality of cyber recovery, and a genuinely compelling data center opportunity building in Saskatchewan and Alberta.

Today on The Buzz: Kaseya tackles the MSP sector's top challenge with MSP Success, a unified growth ecosystem; Zscaler introduces its first complete Zero Trust platform for Agentic AI at Zenith Live 2026; and FlexPoint launches AI-powered agents for MSP accounts receivable.

AWS Canada has opened its first Partner Innovation Hub in Toronto, designed to help partners bridge the AI execution gap between proof-of-concept and production. In The Channel spoke with AWS Canada's Martin Brazinet and CGI's Dinesh Bhavsar on the eve of the launch.

In today's edition of The Buzz, ConnectWise bets big on Predictive IT with a unified platform launch, Cavelo brings an AI security analyst to the MSP market, and Radiant Logic and Zscaler team up to solve a persistent M&A integration headache.

Microserve CTO Nigel Brown was on the floor at Dell Technologies World last week and came away with a practitioner's take on what the AI announcements really mean for Canadian partners - and the clients who aren't quite ready for them yet.

Today's channel news includes a major leadership move at ASUS Canada, an autonomous SOC launch from 7AI, and a strategic channel hire at Guardz.